Literature DB >> 20539794

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis : comparative study of two different types of cages.

Chul-Bum Cho1, Kyeong-Sik Ryu, Chun-Kun Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using two different stand-alone cages in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral foraminal stenosis (IFS).
METHODS: A total of 28 patients who underwent ALIF at L5-S1 using stand-alone cage were studied [Stabilis(R) (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA); 13, SynFix-LR(R) (Synthes Bettlach, Switzerland); 15]. Mean follow-up period was 27.3 +/- 4.9 months. Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were assessed. Radiologically, the change of disc height, intervertebral foraminal (IVF) height and width at the operated segment were measured, and fusion status was defined.
RESULTS: Final mean VAS (back and leg) and ODI scores were significantly decreased from preoperative values (5.6 +/- 2.3 --> 2.3 +/- 2.2, 6.3 +/- 3.2 --> 1.6 +/- 1.6, and 53.7 +/- 18.6 --> 28.3 +/- 13.1, respectively), which were not different between the two devices groups. In Stabilis(R) group, postoperative immediately increased disc and IVF heights (10.09 +/- 4.15 mm --> 14.99 +/- 1.73 mm, 13.00 +/- 2.44 mm --> 16.28 +/- 2.23 mm, respectively) were gradually decreased, and finally returned to preoperative value (11.29 +/- 1.67 mm, 13.59 +/- 2.01 mm, respectively). In SynFix-LR(R) group, immediately increased disc and IVF heights (9.60 +/- 2.82 mm --> 15.61 +/- 0.62 mm, 14.01 +/- 2.53 mm --> 21.27 +/- 1.93 mm, respectively) were maintained until the last follow up (13.72 +/- 1.21 mm, 17.87 +/- 2.02 mm, respectively). The changes of IVF width of each group was minimal pre- and postoperatively. Solid arthrodesis was observed in 11 patients in Stabilis group (11/13, 84.6%) and 13 in SynFix-LR(R) group (13/15, 86.7%).
CONCLUSION: ALIF using stand-alone cage could assure good clinical results in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar IFS in the mid-term follow up. A degree of subsidence at the operated segment was different depending on the device type, which was higher in Stabilis(R) group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior approach; Lumbar foraminal stenosis; Lumbar interbody fusion; Stand-alone cage

Year:  2010        PMID: 20539794      PMCID: PMC2883055          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  30 in total

1.  Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading.

Authors:  A Kettler; H J Wilke; R Dietl; M Krammer; C Lumenta; L Claes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  [One-segment interbody lumbar arthrodesis using impacted cages: posterior unilateral approach versus posterior bilateral approach].

Authors:  J Commarmond
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2001-04

3.  Low fusion rate after L5-S1 laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion using twin stand-alone carbon fiber cages.

Authors:  Ferran Pellisé; Oriol Puig; Antoni Rivas; Joan Bagó; Carlos Villanueva
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The ideal amount of lumbar foraminal distraction for pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  A Infusa; H S An; J M Glover; L McGrady; T H Lim; L H Riley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Problems of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for the rheumatoid spondylitis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Masahiro Inaoka; Koichi Tada; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Re-exploration of the lumbar spine following simple discectomy: a review of 23 cases.

Authors:  T Shiraishi; H V Crock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A comparative biomechanical investigation of anterior lumbar interbody cages: central and bilateral approaches.

Authors:  T R Oxland; Z Hoffer; T Nydegger; G C Rathonyi; L P Nolte
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  [Anterior lumbar interbody fusion as a treatment for chronic refractory lower back pain in disc degeneration and spondylolisthesis using carbon cages - stand alone].

Authors:  T Lübbers; C Bentlage; G Sandvoss
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  2002

10.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis G Crandall; Jan Revella
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stand-alone ALIF with integrated intracorporeal anchoring plates in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc disease: a prospective study on 65 cases.

Authors:  Jérôme Allain; Joël Delecrin; Jacques Beaurain; Alexandre Poignard; Thierry Vila; Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Revision strategies for ventral implant failure in the lumbar spine exemplified by stand-alone cages].

Authors:  T Tarhan; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Li-Xin Guo; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: a prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Katrin Stosch-Wiechert; Franziska Heider; Phat Amnajtrakul; Alexander Krenauer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Novel bone grafting technique in stand-alone ALIF procedure combining allograft and autograft ('Northumbria Technique')-Fusion rate and functional outcomes in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Ata George Kasis; Cyrus Jensen; Rahul Dharmadhikari; Benjamin Ross Emmerson; Matthew Mawdsley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Ming-Chieh Chiang; Jin-Fu Lin; Shang-Chih Lin; Ching-Hua Hung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Successful treatment of severe sympathetically maintained pain following anterior spine surgery.

Authors:  Jae Hee Woo; Hahck Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-07-31

8.  Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion - complications and perioperative results.

Authors:  Rodrigo Amaral; Ronaldo Ferreira; Luis Marchi; Rubens Jensen; Joes Nogueira-Neto; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-09-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.