Literature DB >> 18599542

Bidirectional long-term motor cortical plasticity and metaplasticity induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Masashi Hamada1, Yasuo Terao, Ritsuko Hanajima, Yuichiro Shirota, Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto, Toshiaki Furubayashi, Hideyuki Matsumoto, Yoshikazu Ugawa.   

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising tool to induce plastic changes that are thought in some cases to reflect N-methyl-d-aspartate-sensitive changes in synaptic efficacy. As in animal experiments, there is some evidence that the sign of rTMS-induced plasticity depends on the prior history of cortical activity, conforming to the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) theory. However, experiments exploring these plastic changes have only examined priming-induced effects on a limited number of rTMS protocols, often using designs in which the priming alone had a larger effect than the principle conditioning protocol. The aim of this study was to introduce a new rTMS protocol that gives a broad range of after-effects from suppression to facilitation and then test how each of these is affected by a priming protocol that on its own has no effect on motor cortical excitability, as indexed by motor-evoked potential (MEP). Repeated trains of four monophasic TMS pulses (quadripulse stimulation: QPS) separated by interstimulus intervals of 1.5-1250 ms produced a range of after-effects that were compatible with changes in synaptic plasticity. Thus, QPS at short intervals facilitated MEPs for more than 75 min, whereas QPS at long intervals suppressed MEPs for more than 75 min. Paired-pulse TMS experiments exploring intracortical inhibition and facilitation after QPS revealed effects on excitatory but not inhibitory circuits of the primary motor cortex. Finally, the effect of priming protocols on QPS-induced plasticity was consistent with a BCM-like model of priming that shifts the crossover point at which synaptic plasticity reverses from depression to potentiation. The broad range of after-effects produced by the new rTMS protocol opens up new possibilities for detailed examination of theories of metaplasticity in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18599542      PMCID: PMC2538917          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.152793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  57 in total

1.  Mechanisms of intracortical I-wave facilitation elicited with paired-pulse magnetic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Yasuo Terao; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yasushi Shiio; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Haruo Uesugi; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Ichiro Kanazawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability.

Authors:  F Maeda; J P Keenan; J M Tormos; H Topka; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Evidence for altered NMDA receptor function as a basis for metaplasticity in visual cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin D Philpot; Juan S Espinosa; Mark F Bear
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Erwin Kunesch; Reiner Benecke; Leonardo G Cohen; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Nicolas Lang; Vincenzo Rizzo; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Roger N Lemon; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  0.2-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has no add-on effects as compared to a realistic sham stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Shingo Okabe; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ichiro Kanazawa
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.338

7.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Tihomir V Ilić; Tihomir V Iliać; Christian Pauli; Frank Meintzschel; Diane Ruge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  U Ziemann; S Lönnecker; B J Steinhoff; W Paulus
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Priming stimulation enhances the depressant effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Meenakshi B Iyer; Nicole Schleper; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  70 in total

1.  The theoretical model of theta burst form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; John C Rothwell; Rou-Shayn Chen; Chin-Song Lu; Wen-Li Chuang
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  [Therapeutic applications of closed-loop brain stimulation. Success and expectations].

Authors:  C Zrenner; U Ziemann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Effects of L-Dopa and pramipexole on plasticity induced by QPS in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Enomoto; Yasuo Terao; Suguru Kadowaki; Koichiro Nakamura; Arata Moriya; Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Akioh Yoshihara; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: faster or longer is not necessarily more.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Bidirectional effects on interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity induced by excitatory and inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Takamitsu Watanabe; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yuichiro Shirota; Shinya Ohminami; Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Yasuo Terao; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Satoshi Hirose; Yasushi Miyashita; Seiki Konishi; Akira Kunimatsu; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Priming the brain to capitalize on metaplasticity in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-15

7.  Primary motor cortical metaplasticity induced by priming over the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Masashi Hamada; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yasuo Terao; Shingo Okabe; Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yuichiro Shirota; Shinya Ohminami; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Timing-dependent priming effects of tDCS on ankle motor skill learning.

Authors:  Aishwarya Sriraman; Tatsuya Oishi; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery: Does It Help?

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 10.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.