Literature DB >> 7896580

Neurophysiological model of tinnitus: dependence of the minimal masking level on treatment outcome.

P J Jastreboff1, J W Hazell, R L Graham.   

Abstract

Validity of the neurophysiological model of tinnitus (Jastreboff, 1990), outlined in this paper, was tested on data from multicenter trial of tinnitus masking (Hazell et al., 1985). Minimal masking level, intensity match of tinnitus, and the threshold of hearing have been evaluated on a total of 382 patients before and after 6 months of treatment with maskers, hearing aids, or combination devices. The data has been divided into categories depending on treatment outcome and type of approach used. Results of analysis revealed that: i) the psychoacoustical description of tinnitus does not possess a predictive value for the outcome of the treatment; ii) minimal masking level changed significantly depending on the treatment outcome, decreasing on average by 5.3 dB in patients reporting improvement, and increasing by 4.9 dB in those whose tinnitus remained the same or worsened; iii) 73.9% of patients reporting improvement had their minimal masking level decreased as compared with 50.5% for patients not showing improvement, which is at the level of random change; iv) the type of device used has no significant impact on the treatment outcome and minimal masking level change; v) intensity match and threshold of hearing did not exhibit any significant changes which can be related to treatment outcome. These results are fully consistent with the neurophysiological interpretation of mechanisms involved in the phenomenon of tinnitus and its alleviation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7896580     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90113-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  28 in total

1.  An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Tinnitus outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Mary B Meikle; Barbara J Stewart; Susan E Griest; James A Henry
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-07-03

3.  Individual patient factors associated with effective tinnitus treatment.

Authors:  Sarah M Theodoroff; Andrew Schuette; Susan Griest; James A Henry
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Evaluation and selection of maskers and other devices used in the treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Authors:  R E Sandlin; R J Olsson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-03

5.  [Comment on the European Tinnitus Guideline].

Authors:  G Hesse
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Hearing aids, implantable hearing aids and cochlear implants in chronic tinnitus therapy].

Authors:  H Olze; T Zahnert; G Hesse
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Antidepressants for patients with tinnitus.

Authors:  Paolo Baldo; Carolyn Doree; Paola Molin; Don McFerran; Sara Cecco
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

8.  Non-penetrating round window electrode stimulation for tinnitus therapy followed by cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Gentiana I Wenzel; Petra Sarnes; Athanasia Warnecke; Timo Stöver; Burkard Jäger; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  [DPOAE and lateral inhibition in chronic tinnitus].

Authors:  G Hesse; R Andres; H Schaaf; A Laubert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  [Attention diversion in tinnitus therapy. Comparison of the effects of different treatment methods].

Authors:  K Eysel-Gosepath; F Gerhards; K-H Schicketanz; K Teichmann; M Benthien
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.