Literature DB >> 18596183

Evidence for a link between the extra-retinal component of random-onset pursuit and the anticipatory pursuit of predictable object motion.

G R Barnes1, C J S Collins.   

Abstract

During pursuit of moving targets that temporarily disappear, residual smooth eye movements represent the internal (extra-retinal) component of pursuit. However, this response is dependent on expectation of target reappearance. By comparing responses with and without such expectation during early random-onset pursuit, we examined the temporal development of the extra-retinal component and compared it with anticipatory pursuit, another form of internally driven response. In an initial task (mid-ramp extinction), a moving, random-velocity target was initially visible for 100 or 150 ms but then extinguished for 600 ms before reappearing and continuing to move. Responses comprised an initial visually driven rapid rise in eye velocity, followed by a secondary slower increase during extinction. In a second task (short ramp), with identical initial target presentation but no expectation of target reappearance, the initial rapid rise in eye velocity was followed by decay toward zero. The expectation-dependent difference between responses to these tasks increased in velocity during extinction much more slowly than the initial, visually driven component. In a third task (initial extinction), the moving target was extinguished at motion onset but reappeared 600 ms later. Repetition of identical stimuli evoked anticipatory pursuit triggered by initial target offset. Temporal development and scaling of this anticipatory response, which was based on remembered velocity from prior stimuli, was remarkably similar to and covaried with the difference between mid-ramp extinction and short ramp tasks. Results suggest a common mechanism is responsible for anticipatory pursuit and the extra-retinal component of random-onset pursuit, a finding that is consistent with a previously developed model of pursuit.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18596183      PMCID: PMC2527048          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00060.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  Pursuit movements of normal and amblyopic eyes. An electro-ophthalmographic study. 1. Physiology of pursuit movements.

Authors:  G K VON NOORDEN; G MACKENSEN
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Scaling of smooth anticipatory eye velocity in response to sequences of discrete target movements in humans.

Authors:  C J S Collins; G R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Timing and velocity randomization similarly affect anticipatory pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Jeremy B Badler; William Ting
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of contrast on smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Dirk Kerzel; Doris I Braun; Michael J Hawken; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements.

Authors:  C RASHBASS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Offset dynamics of human smooth pursuit eye movements: effects of target presence and subject attention.

Authors:  J Pola; H J Wyatt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Postsaccadic enhancement of initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys.

Authors:  S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Single-neuron activity in the dorsomedial frontal cortex during smooth-pursuit eye movements to predictable target motion.

Authors:  S J Heinen; M Liu
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Deficits of smooth pursuit eye movements after frontal and parietal lesions.

Authors:  W Heide; K Kurzidim; D Kömpf
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Evidence for synergy between saccades and smooth pursuit during transient target disappearance.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Simon J Bennett; Philippe Lefèvre; Graham R Barnes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  20 in total

1.  Integration time for the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Authors:  Mark Nawrot; Keith Stroyan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Effect of vergence on human ocular following response (OFR).

Authors:  Anand C Joshi; Matthew J Thurtell; Mark F Walker; Alessandro Serra; R John Leigh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  No-go neurons in the cerebellar oculomotor vermis and caudal fastigial nuclei: planning tracking eye movements.

Authors:  Sergei Kurkin; Teppei Akao; Junko Fukushima; Natsuko Shichinohe; Chris R S Kaneko; Tim Belton; Kikuro Fukushima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Saccades to future ball location reveal memory-based prediction in a virtual-reality interception task.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Constantin Rothkopf; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Normal aging affects movement execution but not visual motion working memory and decision-making delay during cue-dependent memory-based smooth-pursuit.

Authors:  Kikuro Fukushima; Graham R Barnes; Norie Ito; Peter M Olley; Tateo Warabi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Anticipatory smooth eye movements with random-dot kinematograms.

Authors:  Elio M Santos; Edinah K Gnang; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Predictive eye movements in natural vision.

Authors:  Mary M Hayhoe; Travis McKinney; Kelly Chajka; Jeff B Pelz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Target position relative to the head is essential for predicting head movement during head-free gaze pursuit.

Authors:  Adam C Pallus; Edward G Freedman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.