Literature DB >> 22406543

Integration time for the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Mark Nawrot1, Keith Stroyan.   

Abstract

The perception of depth from relative motion is believed to be a slow process that "builds-up" over a period of observation. However, in the case of motion parallax, the potential accuracy of the depth estimate suffers as the observer translates during the viewing period. Our recent quantitative model for the perception of depth from motion parallax proposes that relative object depth (d) can be determined from retinal image motion (dθ/dt), pursuit eye movement (dα/dt), and fixation distance (f) by the formula: d/f≈dθ/dα. Given the model's dynamics, it is important to know the integration time required by the visual system to recover dα and dθ, and then estimate d. Knowing the minimum integration time reveals the incumbent error in this process. A depth-phase discrimination task was used to determine the time necessary to perceive depth-sign from motion parallax. Observers remained stationary and viewed a briefly translating random-dot motion parallax stimulus. Stimulus duration varied between trials. Fixation on the translating stimulus was monitored and enforced with an eye-tracker. The study found that relative depth discrimination can be performed with presentations as brief as 16.6 ms, with only two stimulus frames providing both retinal image motion and the stimulus window motion for pursuit (mean range=16.6-33.2 ms). This was found for conditions in which, prior to stimulus presentation, the eye was engaged in ongoing pursuit or the eye was stationary. A large high-contrast masking stimulus disrupted depth-discrimination for stimulus presentations less than 70-75 ms in both pursuit and stationary conditions. This interval might be linked to ocular-following response eye-movement latencies. We conclude that neural mechanisms serving depth from motion parallax generate a depth estimate much more quickly than previously believed. We propose that additional sluggishness might be due to the visual system's attempt to determine the maximum dθ/dα ratio for a selection of points on a complicated stimulus.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22406543      PMCID: PMC3349336          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Motion parallax driven by head movements: conditions for visual stability, perceived depth, and perceived concomitant motion.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ono; Hiroyasu Ujike
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  A neural representation of depth from motion parallax in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  Jacob W Nadler; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion.

Authors:  E C Hildreth; N M Grzywacz; E H Adelson; V K Inada
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

4.  Motion and metacontrast with simultaneous onset of stimuli.

Authors:  W F Bischof; V Di Lollo
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion.

Authors:  R A Andersen; D C Bradley
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Neuronal responses in visual areas MT and MST during smooth pursuit target selection.

Authors:  V P Ferrera; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey.

Authors:  E L Keller; N S Khan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Attention and target selection for smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  V P Ferrera; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The neural processing of 3-D visual information: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  F A Miles
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  4 in total

1.  The role of eye movements in depth from motion parallax during infancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Nawrot; Mark Nawrot
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Aging does not affect integration times for the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Authors:  Jessica Holmin; Mark Nawrot
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  In pursuit of perspective: does vertical perspective disambiguate depth from motion parallax?

Authors:  Jonathon M George; Joshua I Johnson; Mark Nawrot
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Motion parallax thresholds for unambiguous depth perception.

Authors:  Jessica Holmin; Mark Nawrot
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 1.886

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.