Literature DB >> 21249507

A kinematic analysis of relative stability of the lower extremities between subjects with and without chronic low back pain.

Hang Jin Jo1, Ah Young Song, Kyung Jun Lee, Dongchul C Lee, Yoon Hyuk Kim, Paul S Sung.   

Abstract

Even though a number of studies have evaluated postural adjustments based on kinematic changes in subjects with low back pain (LBP), kinematic stability has not been examined for abnormal postural responses during the one leg standing test. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative kinematic stability of the lower extremities and standing duration in subjects with and without chronic LBP. In total, 54 subjects enrolled in the study, including 28 subjects without LBP and 26 subjects with LBP. The average age of the subjects was 37.8 ± 12.6 years and ranged from 19 to 63 years. The outcome measures included normalized holding duration and relative kinematic stability. All participants were asked to maintain the test position without visual input (standing on one leg with his/her eyes closed and with the contra lateral hip flexed 90°) for 25 s. The age variable was used as a covariate to control confounding effects for the data analyses. The control group demonstrated significantly longer holding duration times (T = -2.78, p = 0.007) than the LBP group (24.6 ± 4.2 s vs. 20.5 ± 6.7 s). For the relative kinematic stability, there was a difference in dominance side (F = 9.91, p = 0.003). There was a group interaction between side and lower extremities (F = 11.79, p = 0.001) as well as an interaction between age and dominance side (F = 7.91, p = 0.007). The relative kinematic stability had a moderate negative relationship with age (r = -0.60, p = 0.007) in subjects without LBP. Clinicians need to understand the effects of age and relative stability, which decreased significantly in the single leg holding test, in subjects with LBP in order to develop effective rehabilitation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21249507      PMCID: PMC3175847          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1686-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  The interacting effects of cognitive demand and recovery of postural stability in balance-impaired elderly persons.

Authors:  S G Brauer; M Woollacott; A Shumway-Cook
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 2.  Spinal motion palpation: a comparison of studies that assessed intersegmental end feel vs excursion.

Authors:  Michael T Haneline; Robert Cooperstein; Morgan Young; Kristopher Birkeland
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field.

Authors:  A Shumway-Cook; F B Horak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-10

4.  Kinematic analyses of trunk stability in one leg standing for individuals with recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Yong Woon Ham; Dong Myung Kim; Ju Yeoul Baek; Dongchul C Lee; Paul S Sung
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 5.  Lower limb involvement in spinal function and low back pain.

Authors:  A H McGregor; D W L Hukins
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.398

6.  Comparison of the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective action shown during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Joseph B Myers; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Correlations between force plate measures for assessment of balance.

Authors:  A Karlsson; G Frykberg
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Sara P Gombatto; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Trunk control during standing reach: A dynamical system analysis of movement strategies in patients with mechanical low back pain.

Authors:  Sheri P Silfies; Anand Bhattacharya; Scott Biely; Sue S Smith; Simon Giszter
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 10.  Clinical tools for assessing balance disorders.

Authors:  A Yelnik; I Bonan
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 3.734

View more
  10 in total

1.  Is physiotherapy integrated virtual walking effective on pain, function, and kinesiophobia in patients with non-specific low-back pain? Randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gul Deniz Yilmaz Yelvar; Yasemin Çırak; Murat Dalkılınç; Yasemin Parlak Demir; Zeynep Guner; Ayşenur Boydak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of relative kinematic index with normalized standing time between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Paul S Sung; Pamela Danial
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Factors affecting shoulder-pelvic integration during axial trunk rotation in subjects with recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Woo-Hyung Park; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Tae Ro Lee; Paul S Sung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbopelvic motion during seated hip flexion in subjects with low-back pain accompanying limited hip flexion.

Authors:  Si-hyun Kim; Oh-yun Kwon; Chung-hwi Yi; Heon-seock Cynn; Sung-min Ha; Kyue-nam Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Steadiness of Spinal Regions during Single-Leg Standing in Older Adults with and without Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Yi-Liang Kuo; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Pei-Tzu Chiang; Pei-Yun Lee; Yi-Ju Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of a Progressive Stabilization Exercise Program Using Respiratory Resistance for Patients with Lumbar Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sam-Ho Park; Myung-Mo Lee
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-03-07

7.  Impairment of Proprioception in Young Adult Nonradicular Patients with Lumbar Derangement Syndrome.

Authors:  Marzena Olszewska-Karaban; Anna Permoda-Białozorczyk; Aneta Dąbrowska; Ewa Bandurska; Andrzej Permoda; Jolanta Zajt; Agnieszka Sobierajska-Rek; Dominika Szalewska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Surface electromyography studies in standing position confirm that ankle strategy remains disturbed even following successful treatment of patients with a history of sciatica.

Authors:  Juliusz Huber; Przemysław Lisiński; Jagoda Ciesielska; Aleksandra Kulczyk; Joanna Lipiec; Agata Bandosz
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-02-29

9.  Correlations Between Hip Extension Range of Motion, Hip Extension Asymmetry, and Compensatory Lumbar Movement in Patients with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Won-Deuk Kim; DooChul Shin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-09-24

10.  The Mediating Role of Vision in the Relationship between Proprioception and Postural Control in Older Adults, as Compared to Teenagers and Younger and Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Ainhoa Nieto-Guisado; Monica Solana-Tramunt; Adrià Marco-Ahulló; Marta Sevilla-Sánchez; Cristina Cabrejas; Josep Campos-Rius; Jose Morales
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.