OBJECTIVES: The vesicourethral anastomosis is critical to the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). We retrospectively compared a recently introduced running suture with existing interrupted techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 600 patients undergoing LRP at our institution were reviewed. Each group consisted of 200 patients. Group 1 (intracorporeal-single-knot-running suture) was compared to cohorts in whom the anastomosis was created by interrupted suturing, with (group 2) or without (group 3) a previously placed 6 o'clock suture. Intraoperative data and cystographic evaluation were collected prospectively. Detailed analysis of the location of extravasation was correlated with duration of leak. At a median follow up of 26 months, continence and stricture rates were assessed. RESULTS: The groups were statistically similar with respect to age, prostate volumes and pre-operative PSA. Numbers of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and/or nerve-sparing procedures were also similar between groups. The median time for anastomosis was significantly shorter for group 1 (15.3 min) compared to group 2 (23.5 min) and group 3 (27.7 min) (P < 0.000.1). This was reflected in the overall operative times [group 1; 155.4 min, group 2; 185.6 min and group 3; 202.2 min (P = 0.03)]. Subjective assessment suggested that tension to the anastamosis was present in fewer patients in group 1 (3.5%) compared to group 2 (17%) and group 3 (9.5%) (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the continence or stricture rate between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous anastomotic suture reduced the operative time and tension to the anastomosis. However, the long term continence and stricture rates were unaffected by anastomotic technique.
OBJECTIVES: The vesicourethral anastomosis is critical to the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). We retrospectively compared a recently introduced running suture with existing interrupted techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 600 patients undergoing LRP at our institution were reviewed. Each group consisted of 200 patients. Group 1 (intracorporeal-single-knot-running suture) was compared to cohorts in whom the anastomosis was created by interrupted suturing, with (group 2) or without (group 3) a previously placed 6 o'clock suture. Intraoperative data and cystographic evaluation were collected prospectively. Detailed analysis of the location of extravasation was correlated with duration of leak. At a median follow up of 26 months, continence and stricture rates were assessed. RESULTS: The groups were statistically similar with respect to age, prostate volumes and pre-operative PSA. Numbers of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and/or nerve-sparing procedures were also similar between groups. The median time for anastomosis was significantly shorter for group 1 (15.3 min) compared to group 2 (23.5 min) and group 3 (27.7 min) (P < 0.000.1). This was reflected in the overall operative times [group 1; 155.4 min, group 2; 185.6 min and group 3; 202.2 min (P = 0.03)]. Subjective assessment suggested that tension to the anastamosis was present in fewer patients in group 1 (3.5%) compared to group 2 (17%) and group 3 (9.5%) (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the continence or stricture rate between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous anastomotic suture reduced the operative time and tension to the anastomosis. However, the long term continence and stricture rates were unaffected by anastomotic technique.
Authors: Roland F Van Velthoven; Thomas E Ahlering; Alexandre Peltier; Douglas W Skarecky; Ralph V Clayman Journal: Urology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Jean J M C H De La Rosette; Claude C Abbou; Jens Rassweiler; M Pilar Laguna; Claude C Schulman Journal: Arch Esp Urol Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 0.436
Authors: M P Laguna; L C Schreuders; J J Rassweiler; C C Abbou; R van Velthoven; G Janetschek; G Breda; J J M C H de la Rosette Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2004-12-16 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: A Nadu; L Salomon; A Hoznek; L E Olsson; F Saint; A de La Taille; A Cicco; D Chopin; C C Abbou Journal: J Urol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Gita M Schoeppler; Dirk Zaak; Dirk-Andre Clevert; Petra Schuhmann; Oliver Reich; Michael Seitz; Wael Y Khoder; Michael Staehler; Christian G Stief; Alexander Buchner Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Jonas Busch; Frank Friedersdorff; Nora Köhler; Nasrin El-Bandar; Andreas Maxeiner; Bernhard Ralla; Kurt Miller Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Milan Hora; Petr Stránský; Jiří Klečka; Ivan Trávníček; Tomáš Urge; Viktor Eret; Jiří Ferda; Fredrik Petersson; Ondřej Hes Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 1.195