Literature DB >> 15716199

Development of laparoscopic surgery and training facilities in Europe: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT).

M P Laguna1, L C Schreuders, J J Rassweiler, C C Abbou, R van Velthoven, G Janetschek, G Breda, J J M C H de la Rosette.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT) conducted a survey in order to assess the application of laparoscopy and the facilitation of training programs within Europe.
METHODS: A total of 430 urologists and residents from European countries answered the ESUT survey during the XVIIIth Annual EAU Meeting in Madrid in 2003. The survey constituted of 11 questions of which nine with dual response (Y/N) options. Two questions, evaluating the importance of different training methods and different reasons not to be involved in laparoscopy, were assessed by means of a Likert type scale.
RESULTS: Laparoscopy was performed in 71% of urological departments. The majority (85%) of departments where no laparoscopy was performed, intended to establish it in the future. Two thirds of respondents believed laparoscopy would replace open surgery in the next 5 to 10 years. The access to training facilities was insufficient for 44%. Different methods of training were considered to be of equal importance. Among the reasons for not being involved in laparoscopic surgery a high variability was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is performed in the majority of urological departments in Europe. While there is a strong believe in the prominent role of laparoscopy in the mid-long future, access to training is still needed.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15716199     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Tibet Erdogru; Joanne Cresswell; Ali Serdar Gözen; Thomas Frede; Jens J Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Laparoscopic surgery in urology: Taining and education].

Authors:  R Rabenalt; D Minh; A Dietel; B Bynens; S Papadoukakis; A McNeill; E Liatsikos; M Truss; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Safe introduction of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in clinical practice: impact of a modular training program.

Authors:  Francesco Cantiello; Domenico Veneziano; Riccardo Bertolo; Antonio Cicione; Cristian Fiori; Riccardo Autorino; Rocco Damiano; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The 'complements' to virtual simulation.

Authors:  Juan Gómez Rivas; Selçuk Sarıkaya
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015

5.  Simplifying laparoscopic nephrectomy: the inferior approach with en bloc stapling of the renal hilum.

Authors:  Oscar Schatloff; Andrei Nadu; Uri Lindner; Jacob Ramon
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Postgraduate course in minimally invasive urological surgery.

Authors:  Antonio C H Mariotti; Fabio C M Torricelli; Weslley S Andrade; Anuar I Mitre; Marco A Arap
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04

7.  Training of Brazilian Urology residents in laparoscopy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Wilson Francisco Schreiner Busato; Fernanda Girardi; Gilberto Laurino Almeida
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 8.  Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models.

Authors:  Roland F van Velthoven; Paul Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 9.  Transfer of skills from the experimental model to the patients.

Authors:  P Thierry Piechaud; A Pansadoro
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.862

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.