Literature DB >> 18594100

Gait analysis of children treated for clubfoot with physical therapy or the Ponseti cast technique.

Ron El-Hawary1, Lori A Karol, Kelly A Jeans, B Stephens Richards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, clubfoot is initially treated with nonoperative methods including the Ponseti cast technique and the French functional physical therapy program. Our goal was to evaluate the function of children treated with these techniques.
METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 182 patients with idiopathic clubfoot (273 feet) who were initially treated nonoperatively. Seventy-seven patients (119 feet) were excluded because they had either received a combination of nonoperative treatments or had undergone surgery prior to testing. Gait analysis was performed when the children were approximately two years of age. Temporal and kinematic data were classified as abnormal if they were more than one standard deviation from normal.
RESULTS: Gait analysis was performed on 105 patients (fifty-six treated with casts and forty-nine treated with physical therapy) with 154 involved feet (seventy-nine treated with casts and seventy-five treated with physical therapy). These patients were an average of two years and three months of age, and their initial Diméglio scores ranged between 10 and 17. No significant differences in cadence parameters were found between the two groups. The rate of normal kinematic ankle motion in the sagittal plane was higher in the group treated with physical therapy (65% of the feet) than it was in the group treated with the Ponseti cast technique (47%) (p = 0.0317). More children treated with physical therapy walked with knee hyperextension (37% of the feet) (p < 0.0001), an equinus gait (15%) (p = 0.0051), and footdrop (19%) (p = 0.0072); only one patient treated with casts walked with an equinus gait, and only three demonstrated footdrop. In contrast, more of the patients in the cast-treatment group demonstrated excessive stance-phase dorsiflexion (48% of the feet) (p < 0.0001) and a calcaneus gait (10%). More feet in the physical therapy group had an increased internal foot progression angle (44% compared with 24% in the cast-treatment group; p = 0.0144) and increased shank-based foot rotation (73% compared with 57% in the cast-treatment group; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: While the rate of normal kinematic ankle motion in the sagittal plane was 65% in the group treated with physical therapy, the gait abnormalities that were seen in that group were characterized by mild equinus and/or footdrop. The rate of normal kinematic ankle motion in the sagittal plane was 47% in the cast-treatment group, but the most common gait abnormality in this group was mildly increased dorsiflexion in the stance phase. The rates of calcaneus gait and equinus gait were <or=15% in each nonoperative group. The differences between the physical therapy and cast-treatment groups may, in part, be the result of the percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening that is performed as part of the Ponseti cast technique but not as part of the physical therapy program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594100     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Pedobarographic analysis following Ponseti treatment for congenital clubfoot.

Authors:  Marc F Sinclair; Kerstin Bosch; Dieter Rosenbaum; Stephanie Böhm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A comprehensive outcome comparison of surgical and Ponseti clubfoot treatments with reference to pediatric norms.

Authors:  Chris Church; Julie A Coplan; Dijana Poljak; Ahmed M Thabet; Durga Kowtharapu; Nancy Lennon; Stephanie Marchesi; John Henley; Roland Starr; Dan Mason; Mohan V Belthur; John E Herzenberg; Freeman Miller
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Long-term follow-up of children with a surgically treated clubfoot: Assessing the multi-segment-foot motions, dynamic plantar pressures, and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Xue-Cheng Liu; John Thometz; Jonathan Campbell; Channing Tassone
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-12-30

4.  Foot function during gait and parental perceived outcome in older children with symptomatic club foot deformity.

Authors:  Jennifer Leigh McCahill; Julie Stebbins; Jaap Harlaar; Robin Prescott; Tim Theologis; Christopher Lavy
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-11-02

5.  Gait analysis after initial nonoperative treatment for clubfeet: intermediate term followup at age 5.

Authors:  Lori A Karol; Kelly Jeans; Ron ElHawary
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Clubfoot treatment: Ponseti and French functional methods are equally effective.

Authors:  Shawne Faulks; B Stephens Richards
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparison of different conservative treatments for idiopathic clubfoot: Ponseti's versus non-Ponseti's methods.

Authors:  Jin-Peng He; Jing Fan Shao; Yun Hao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 8.  Exploring the Unmet Need for Technology to Promote Motor Ability in Children Younger Than 5 Years of Age: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amanda J Arnold; Joshua L Haworth; Victor Olivares Moran; Ahmad Abulhasan; Noah Steinbuch; Elena Kokkoni
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-04-05

9.  Functional Assessment of the Foot Undergoing Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy in Term of Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Bin Liu; Shu-Yun Jiang; Li Zhao; Yan Yu; Xu-Chen Tao; Da-Hang Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.