Xue-Cheng Liu1, John Thometz1, Jonathan Campbell1, Channing Tassone1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9000 W. Wisconsin Ave., PO. Box 1997, Suite C360, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare surgically treated clubfoot with typically developing (TD) children using plantar pressure, multi-segment-foot kinematic analysis, and multiple functional outcomes in comprehensive and long-term study. Methods: 26 patients with 45 clubfeet and 23 TD children with 45 normal feet were evaluated. Most clubfoot patients had a complete subtalar release and a few patients had a posterior medial-lateral release at the mean age of 5 years and 6 months. The mean age at follow-up for clubfoot was 12 years and 5 months. Subjects underwent physical and radiographic examination, plantar pressure analysis, multi-segment-foot motion analysis, AAOS Foot & Ankle Questionnaire (AAOS-FAQ), the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). RESULTS: Clubfoot patients scored significantly worse than TD on the AAOS-FAQ (90.9 vs.99.9 for pain and comfort), the CBCL Problems scale (23.1 vs.6.3), and several subscales of the PODCI (86.5 vs.96.7 for Sports and Physical Functioning) (P<0.05). Peak pressure at the lateral heel (25.6 vs.29.6 N/cm2), contact area at the 1 st metatarsal head (1 st MT) (6.0 vs. 7.2 cm2) and the pressure time integral at the 1 st MT (5.2 vs. 11.0 N/cm2 ∗ s) were significantly lower for the clubfoot group compared to the TD foot group (P<0.05). Maximum dorsiflexion of the 1 st metatarsal-hallux (1 st MT-Hal) (17.5° vs. 34.8°) during stance phase (ST), supination of the 1 st MT-Hal during swing phase (SW) (4° vs. 7°), maximum plantarflexion of the ankle during ST (-6.8° vs.-11.2°), and maximum varus of the ankle during SW (4.4° vs. 6.9°) were also lower for clubfoot except for maximum dorsiflexion of the navicular-1 st MT (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study supports evidence that surgically treated clubfoot continues to have residual deformity of forefoot, overcorrection of hindfoot, stiffness, and a decrease in physical functioning. This comprehensive study accurately portrays postsurgical clubfoot function with objective means through appropriate technologies. A plantar pressure redistributed and finite element analysis designed orthosis may be of importance in the improvement of the foot and ankle joint function for ambulatory children with a relapse of clubfoot deformity.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare surgically treated clubfoot with typically developing (TD) children using plantar pressure, multi-segment-foot kinematic analysis, and multiple functional outcomes in comprehensive and long-term study. Methods: 26 patients with 45 clubfeet and 23 TD children with 45 normal feet were evaluated. Most clubfoot patients had a complete subtalar release and a few patients had a posterior medial-lateral release at the mean age of 5 years and 6 months. The mean age at follow-up for clubfoot was 12 years and 5 months. Subjects underwent physical and radiographic examination, plantar pressure analysis, multi-segment-foot motion analysis, AAOS Foot & Ankle Questionnaire (AAOS-FAQ), the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). RESULTS: Clubfoot patients scored significantly worse than TD on the AAOS-FAQ (90.9 vs.99.9 for pain and comfort), the CBCL Problems scale (23.1 vs.6.3), and several subscales of the PODCI (86.5 vs.96.7 for Sports and Physical Functioning) (P<0.05). Peak pressure at the lateral heel (25.6 vs.29.6 N/cm2), contact area at the 1 st metatarsal head (1 st MT) (6.0 vs. 7.2 cm2) and the pressure time integral at the 1 st MT (5.2 vs. 11.0 N/cm2 ∗ s) were significantly lower for the clubfoot group compared to the TD foot group (P<0.05). Maximum dorsiflexion of the 1 st metatarsal-hallux (1 st MT-Hal) (17.5° vs. 34.8°) during stance phase (ST), supination of the 1 st MT-Hal during swing phase (SW) (4° vs. 7°), maximum plantarflexion of the ankle during ST (-6.8° vs.-11.2°), and maximum varus of the ankle during SW (4.4° vs. 6.9°) were also lower for clubfoot except for maximum dorsiflexion of the navicular-1 st MT (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study supports evidence that surgically treated clubfoot continues to have residual deformity of forefoot, overcorrection of hindfoot, stiffness, and a decrease in physical functioning. This comprehensive study accurately portrays postsurgical clubfoot function with objective means through appropriate technologies. A plantar pressure redistributed and finite element analysis designed orthosis may be of importance in the improvement of the foot and ankle joint function for ambulatory children with a relapse of clubfoot deformity.
Authors: Xue-Cheng Liu; David Embrey; Channing Tassone; Frederick Klingbeil; Carlos Marquez-Barrientos; Brenna Brandsma; Roger Lyon; Jeffrey Schwab; Sergey Tarima; John Thometz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Giovanni Trisolino; Stefano Stallone; Paola Zarantonello; Andrea Evangelista; Manila Boarini; Jacopo Faranda Cordella; Luca Lerma; Luisa Veronesi; Cosma Caterina Guerra; Luca Sangiorgi; Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro; Renato Maria Toniolo Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-06-08