Literature DB >> 23449014

A comprehensive outcome comparison of surgical and Ponseti clubfoot treatments with reference to pediatric norms.

Chris Church1, Julie A Coplan, Dijana Poljak, Ahmed M Thabet, Durga Kowtharapu, Nancy Lennon, Stephanie Marchesi, John Henley, Roland Starr, Dan Mason, Mohan V Belthur, John E Herzenberg, Freeman Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Isolated congenital clubfoot can be treated either operatively (posteromedial release) or conservatively (Ponseti method). This study retrospectively compared mid-term outcomes after surgical and Ponseti treatments to a normal sample and used multiple evaluation techniques, such as detailed gait analysis and foot kinematics.
METHODS: Twenty-six children with clubfoot treated surgically and 22 children with clubfoot treated with the Ponseti technique were evaluated retrospectively and compared to 34 children with normal feet. Comprehensive evaluation included a full gait analysis with multi-segment and single-segment foot kinematics, pedobarograph, physical examination, validated outcome questionnaires, and radiographic measurements.
RESULTS: The Ponseti group had significantly better plantarflexion and dorsiflexion range of motion during gait and had greater push-off power. Residual varus was present in both treatment groups, but more so in the operative group. Gait analysis also showed that the operative group had residual in-toeing, which appeared well corrected in the Ponseti group. Pedobarograph results showed that the operative group had significantly increased varus and significantly decreased medial foot pressure. The physical examination demonstrated significantly greater stiffness in the operative group in dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, ankle inversion, and midfoot abduction and adduction. Surveys showed that the Ponseti group had significantly more normal pediatric outcome data collection instrument results, disease-specific indices, and Dimeglio scores. The radiographic results suggested greater equinus and cavus and increased foot internal rotation profile in the operative group compared with the Ponseti group.
CONCLUSIONS: Ponseti treatment provides superior outcome to posteromedial release surgery, but residual deformity still persists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clubfoot; Foot; Gait analysis; Kinematics; Pediatrics; Ponseti

Year:  2012        PMID: 23449014      PMCID: PMC3303018          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0387-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  41 in total

1.  Comparison of three outcomes instruments in children.

Authors:  J Pencharz; N L Young; J L Owen; J G Wright
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Gait analysis of children treated for moderate clubfoot with physical therapy versus the Ponseti cast technique.

Authors:  Hilton Phillip Gottschalk; Lori A Karol; Kelly A Jeans
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Final evaluation of clubfoot.

Authors:  H Bensahel; A Dimeglio; P Souchet
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Segmental foot mobility in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Charles Saltzman; H John Yack
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Ponseti method compared with surgical treatment of clubfoot: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Matthew A Halanski; Jan E Davison; Jen-Chen Huang; Cameron G Walker; Stewart J Walsh; Haemish A Crawford
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release.

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Ryan Nunley; Perry L Schoenecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Comparison of Ponseti versus surgical treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: a short-term preliminary report.

Authors:  Ernst B Zwick; Tanja Kraus; Claudia Maizen; Gerhardt Steinwender; Wolfgang E Linhart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot.

Authors:  S J Laaveg; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Jose A Morcuende; Lori A Dolan; Frederick R Dietz; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Suzanne Steinman; B Stephens Richards; Shawne Faulks; Kim Kaipus
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Christof Radler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Idiopathic clubfoot: ten year follow-up after a soft tissue release procedure.

Authors:  Noppachart Limpaphayom; Stephen J Kerr; Pairatch Prasongchin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Sensor based braces: Challenges ahead.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-22

Review 4.  Relapsing and residual clubfoot deformities after the application of the ponseti method: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Ali Parsa; Mohammad Hallaj Moghadam; Mohammad H Taraz Jamshidi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15

Review 5.  Relapses in clubfoot treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol- a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Anuj Rastogi; Prateek Rastogi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-02

6.  Mid-term results of a physiotherapist-led Ponseti service for the management of non-idiopathic and idiopathic clubfoot.

Authors:  Mia Dunkley; Yael Gelfer; Debbie Jackson; Evette Parnell; Jennifer Armstong; Cristina Rafter; Deborah M Eastwood
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sang Gyo Seo; Dong Yeon Lee; Hyuk Ju Moon; Sung Ju Kim; Jihyeung Kim; Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Ponseti casting for severe club foot deformity: are clinical outcomes promising?

Authors:  Mohammad Hallaj-Moghaddam; Ali Moradi; Mohammad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh; Seyed Reza Habibzadeh Shojaie
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-02-10

9.  Ponseti method compared to previous treatment of clubfoot in Norway. A multicenter study of 205 children followed for 8-11 years.

Authors:  Christian Sætersdal; Jonas M Fevang; John Asle Bjørlykke; Lars B Engesæter
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Gait in 5-year-old children with idiopathic clubfoot: A cohort study of 59 children, focusing on foot involvement and the contralateral foot.

Authors:  Elin Lööf; Hanneke Andriesse; Marie André; Stephanie Böhm; Eva W Broström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.