Literature DB >> 18594089

Older patients' unexpressed concerns about orthopaedic surgery.

Pamela L Hudak1, Kristy Armstrong, Clarence Braddock, Richard M Frankel, Wendy Levinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the U.S. population ages, orthopaedic surgeons will increasingly be required to counsel older patients about major surgical procedures. Understanding patient concerns or worries about surgery could help orthopaedic surgeons to assist their patients in making these decisions. The objectives of this study were to explore the nature of patient concerns regarding orthopaedic surgery and to describe how patients raise concerns during visits with orthopaedic surgeons and how orthopaedic surgeons respond.
METHODS: As part of a study involving audiotaping of 886 visits between patients and orthopaedic surgeons, fifty-nine patients sixty years of age or older who were considering surgery were recruited to participate in semistructured telephone interviews at five to seven days and one month after the visit. Patients were asked about their perceptions of the visit and how they made their decision about surgery. These interviews were analyzed to identify patients' concerns with the use of qualitative content analysis and then compared with the audiotaped visits to determine whether these concerns were actually raised during the visit and, if so, how well the orthopaedic surgeons responded. Analyses based on patient race (black or white) were also performed.
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four concerns pertaining to (1) the surgery (anticipated quality of life after the surgery, the care facility, the timing of the operation, and the patient's capacity to meet the demands of the surgery) and (2) the surgeons (their competency, communication, and professional practices) were identified. Patients raised only 53% of their concerns with the orthopaedic surgeons and were selective in what they disclosed; concerns about the timing of the operation and about the care facility were frequently raised, but concerns about their capacity to meet the demands of the surgery and about the orthopaedic surgeons were not. Orthopaedic surgeons responded positively to 66% of the concerns raised by the patients. Only two concerns were raised in response to direct surgeon inquiry.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients raised only half their concerns regarding surgery with orthopaedic surgeons. Orthopaedic surgeons are encouraged to fully address how patients' capacity to meet the demands of the surgery, defined by their resources (such as social support, transportation, and finances) and obligations (to family members, employers, and religion), may impinge on their willingness to accept recommended surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594089      PMCID: PMC2657304          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  "Does this mean I'm crazy?" Hidden worries of treatment-naive patients.

Authors:  Michael W Kahn
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Reducing patients' unmet concerns in primary care: the difference one word can make.

Authors:  John Heritage; Jeffrey D Robinson; Marc N Elliott; Megan Beckett; Michael Wilkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Motives for seeking a second opinion in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  I van Dalen; J Groothoff; R Stewart; P Spreeuwenberg; P Groenewegen; J van Horn
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2001-10

4.  Do newly diagnosed lung cancer patients feel their concerns are being met?

Authors:  K M Hill; Z Amir; M F Muers; C K Connolly; C E Round
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Why do patients seek a second opinion or alternative medicine?

Authors:  L R Sutherland; M J Verhoef
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  Is physician self-disclosure related to patient evaluation of office visits?

Authors:  Mary Catherine Beach; Debra Roter; Haya Rubin; Richard Frankel; Wendy Levinson; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Racial and ethnic differences in patient perceptions of bias and cultural competence in health care.

Authors:  Rachel L Johnson; Somnath Saha; Jose J Arbelaez; Mary Catherine Beach; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  "You're perfect for the procedure! Why don't you want it?" Elderly arthritis patients' unwillingness to consider total joint arthroplasty surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pamela L Hudak; Jocalyn P Clark; Gillian A Hawker; Peter C Coyte; Nizar N Mahomed; Hans J Kreder; James G Wright
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Patients who seek a second opinion: are they different from the typical referral?

Authors:  L R Sutherland; M J Verhoef
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved?

Authors:  M K Marvel; R M Epstein; K Flowers; H B Beckman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Impact of hearing loss on clinical interactions between older adults and health professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Smith; Muhammad Arsyad Bin Nordin; Tom Hinchy; Patrick Henn; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  The role of patient activation in psychiatric visits.

Authors:  Michelle P Salyers; Marianne S Matthias; Crystal L Spann; Jennifer M Lydick; Angela L Rollins; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Studying physician-patient communication in the acute care setting: the hospitalist rapport study.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Kathryn Winters; Robert M Arnold; Kathleen A Puntillo; Douglas B White; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-05-04

Review 4.  Assessment of patient concerns: a review.

Authors:  Jemima Nilan; Deepak Doltani; Dominic Harmon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  James Slover; Jennifer Shue; Karl Koenig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Do surgeons and patients discuss what they document on consent forms?

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Barbara H Hanusa; Michael J Fine; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  Current concepts of shared decision making in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Klifto; Christopher Klifto; James Slover
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

8.  Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences.

Authors:  Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  The Impact Of Decision Aids On Adults Considering Hip Or Knee Surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa B Hurley; Hector P Rodriguez; Stephen Kearing; Yue Wang; Ming D Leung; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Factors that influence the choice to undergo surgery for shoulder and elbow conditions.

Authors:  Chetan S Modi; Christian J H Veillette; Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.