Jemima Nilan1, Deepak Doltani1, Dominic Harmon2,3. 1. Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. 2. Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. dominicharmon@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Limerick University Hospital, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland. dominicharmon@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient-centred communication is the mainstay of the medical consultation. It includes the assessment of patient concerns and is important in building the doctor-patient therapeutic relationship. Our aim was to perform a literature review to identify relevance of patient concern assessment, to identify what concerns are encountered in various clinical settings and to explore the different methodologies used to obtain them. METHODS: A narrative review was performed. RESULTS: Addressing patient concerns is associated with increased patient satisfaction. Unvoiced concerns are associated with unresolved health issues and poor doctor-patient relationships. Different specialities have focused on different aspects of concern assessment. Patient concern assessment studies are mostly qualitative in nature. Not all qualitative methods give similar results. Interviews are more reliable sources of information than questionnaires as no one questionnaire captures all patient concerns. The location where interviews take place is also relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing patient concerns is associated with positive outcomes. Patient concerns are handled differently by different clinical specialties. Various methodologies have been used for concern assessment. Interviews and questionnaires can often yield different results.
BACKGROUND:Patient-centred communication is the mainstay of the medical consultation. It includes the assessment of patient concerns and is important in building the doctor-patient therapeutic relationship. Our aim was to perform a literature review to identify relevance of patient concern assessment, to identify what concerns are encountered in various clinical settings and to explore the different methodologies used to obtain them. METHODS: A narrative review was performed. RESULTS: Addressing patient concerns is associated with increased patient satisfaction. Unvoiced concerns are associated with unresolved health issues and poor doctor-patient relationships. Different specialities have focused on different aspects of concern assessment. Patient concern assessment studies are mostly qualitative in nature. Not all qualitative methods give similar results. Interviews are more reliable sources of information than questionnaires as no one questionnaire captures all patient concerns. The location where interviews take place is also relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing patient concerns is associated with positive outcomes. Patient concerns are handled differently by different clinical specialties. Various methodologies have been used for concern assessment. Interviews and questionnaires can often yield different results.
Entities:
Keywords:
Assessment; Concerns; Patient-centred communication
Authors: Kevin Fiscella; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks; Cleveland G Shields; Paul Duberstein; Susan H McDaniel; Ronald M Epstein Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Joy R Goebel; Cathy D Sherbourne; Steven M Asch; Lisa Meredith; Angela B Cohen; Emily Hagenmaier; Andy B Lanto; Barbara Simon; Lisa V Rubenstein; Lisa R Shugarman; Karl A Lorenz Journal: Pain Manag Nurs Date: 2009-09-12 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Pamela L Hudak; Kristy Armstrong; Clarence Braddock; Richard M Frankel; Wendy Levinson Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.284