Literature DB >> 18592500

Reasons for the apparent difference in the effects of produced and added ethanol on culture viability during rapid fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

G Dasari1, M A Worth, M A Connor, N B Pamment.   

Abstract

By feeding ethanol at various high rates to low cell density cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae it was shown that the sharp fall in viability when ethanol is produced during rapid fermentations is in part a direct consequence of the high rate of change of extracellular ethanol concentration. Nevertheless, the fall in viability in high cell density rapid fermentations which produced 98 g L(-1) ethanol in 3 h considerably exceeded that of control low cell density cultures to which ethanol was added at the same rate. This difference was shown to be not due to intracellular ethanol accumulation or to differences in glucose concentration between the cultures. The concentrations of a range of potentially toxic fatty acids, higher alcohols, and esters were measured during rapid fermentations, but when added at these concentrations to control cultures in the presence of ethanol they had no significant toxic effect. However, when rapid fermentations were conducted in rich medium containing 80 g L(-1) yeast extract, the apparent difference in toxicity of produced and added ethanol virtually disappeared. Magnesium was shown to be the component of yeast extract primarily responsible for this effect. The high rate of fall of viability when ethanol is rapidly produced is suggested to be partly due to the inability of the cells to adapt quickly enough to the rising ethanol concentration and partly to an increased demand for magnesium at higher ethanol concentrations which cannot be met in Mg-unsupplemented high cell density fermentations.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 18592500     DOI: 10.1002/bit.260350202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  3 in total

Review 1.  Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Paul J Weimer; Willem H van Zyl; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improvement in ethanol tolerance by accumulation of trehalose.

Authors:  Nileema R Divate; Gen-Hung Chen; Pei-Ming Wang; Bor-Rung Ou; Yun-Chin Chung
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 3.  Physiology of yeasts in relation to biomass yields.

Authors:  C Verduyn
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1991 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.271

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.