PURPOSE: To determine the clinical relevance of Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with normal karyotype (NK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exons 7 and 9 of WT1 were screened in samples from 470 young adult NK AMLs using a combination of direct sequencing and high-resolution capillary electrophoresis. RESULTS: Overall, 51 mutations were detected in 47 cases (10%): 46 frameshift mutations with insertion/deletion of one to 28 base pairs in exon 7 (n = 45) or exon 9 (n = 1), with a median mutant level of 45% (range, 8% to 86%), and five substitutions in exon 9: D396N (n = 3), H397Y (n = 1) and H397Q (n = 1). Patients with WT1 mutations had an inferior response to induction chemotherapy compared with wild-type cases (complete remission rate, 79% v 90%, odds ratio [OR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.17 to 7.82; P = .02), a higher rate of resistant disease (15% v 4%; OR = 9.33; 95% CI, 2.38 to 36.6; P = .001), an increased cumulative incidence of relapse (67% v 43%, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.38; P = .0008), with a reduction in both relapse-free survival (22% v 44%; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.55; P = .005) and overall survival (26% v 47%; HR = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.95; P = .007) at 5 years. In multivariate analysis, which included FLT3 internal tandem duplication and NPM1 mutation status, the presence of a WT1 mutation remained an independent adverse prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: WT1 mutations are a negative prognostic indicator in NK AML and may be suitable for the development of targeted therapy.
PURPOSE: To determine the clinical relevance of Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with normal karyotype (NK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exons 7 and 9 of WT1 were screened in samples from 470 young adult NK AMLs using a combination of direct sequencing and high-resolution capillary electrophoresis. RESULTS: Overall, 51 mutations were detected in 47 cases (10%): 46 frameshift mutations with insertion/deletion of one to 28 base pairs in exon 7 (n = 45) or exon 9 (n = 1), with a median mutant level of 45% (range, 8% to 86%), and five substitutions in exon 9: D396N (n = 3), H397Y (n = 1) and H397Q (n = 1). Patients with WT1 mutations had an inferior response to induction chemotherapy compared with wild-type cases (complete remission rate, 79% v 90%, odds ratio [OR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.17 to 7.82; P = .02), a higher rate of resistant disease (15% v 4%; OR = 9.33; 95% CI, 2.38 to 36.6; P = .001), an increased cumulative incidence of relapse (67% v 43%, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.38; P = .0008), with a reduction in both relapse-free survival (22% v 44%; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.55; P = .005) and overall survival (26% v 47%; HR = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.95; P = .007) at 5 years. In multivariate analysis, which included FLT3 internal tandem duplication and NPM1 mutation status, the presence of a WT1 mutation remained an independent adverse prognostic factor. CONCLUSION:WT1 mutations are a negative prognostic indicator in NK AML and may be suitable for the development of targeted therapy.
Authors: Subarna Sinha; Daniel Thomas; Linda Yu; Andrew J Gentles; Namyoung Jung; M Ryan Corces-Zimmerman; Steven M Chan; Andreas Reinisch; Andrew P Feinberg; David L Dill; Ravindra Majeti Journal: Blood Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Thomas Ernst; Andrew Chase; Katerina Zoi; Katherine Waghorn; Claire Hidalgo-Curtis; Joannah Score; Amy Jones; Francis Grand; Andreas Reiter; Andreas Hochhaus; Nicholas C P Cross Journal: Haematologica Date: 2010-04-26 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Steven M Kornblau; Mark D Minden; David B Rosen; Santosh Putta; Aileen Cohen; Todd Covey; David C Spellmeyer; Wendy J Fantl; Urte Gayko; Alessandra Cesano Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Valeria Tosello; Marc R Mansour; Kelly Barnes; Maddalena Paganin; Maria Luisa Sulis; Sarah Jenkinson; Christopher G Allen; Rosemary E Gale; David C Linch; Teresa Palomero; Pedro Real; Vundavalli Murty; Xiaopan Yao; Susan M Richards; Anthony Goldstone; Jacob Rowe; Giuseppe Basso; Peter H Wiernik; Elisabeth Paietta; Rob Pieters; Martin Horstmann; Jules P P Meijerink; Adolfo A Ferrando Journal: Blood Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Guido Marcucci; Krzysztof Mrózek; Michael D Radmacher; Ramiro Garzon; Clara D Bloomfield Journal: Blood Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Xiao-Wei Qi; Xiao-Dong Zheng; Bei-Ge Zong; Qing-Qiu Chen; Fan Zhang; Xin-Hua Yang; Yi Zhang; Jun-Lan Liu; Jun Jiang Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: David C Taussig; Jacques Vargaftig; Farideh Miraki-Moud; Emmanuel Griessinger; Kirsty Sharrock; Tina Luke; Debra Lillington; Heather Oakervee; Jamie Cavenagh; Samir G Agrawal; T Andrew Lister; John G Gribben; Dominique Bonnet Journal: Blood Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 22.113