Literature DB >> 18581403

Circumferential strain in the wall of the common carotid artery: comparing displacement-encoded and cine MRI in volunteers.

Alexander P Lin1, Eric Bennett, Lauren E Wisk, Morteza Gharib, Scott E Fraser, Han Wen.   

Abstract

The walls of conduit arteries undergo cyclic stretching from the periodic fluctuation of arterial pressure. Atherosclerotic lesions have been shown to localize to regions of excessive stretching of the arterial wall. We employed a displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) sequence to image the motion of the common carotid artery wall and map the two-dimensional (2D) circumferential strain. The sequence utilizes a fully-balanced steady-state free-precession (SSFP) readout with 0.60 mm in-plane resolution. Preliminary results in volunteers at 1.5T (N = 4) and 3.0T (N = 17) are compared to measurements of the lumen circumference from cine images. The agreement between the two independent measurements at both field strengths (P < or = 0.001) supports the use of DENSE as a means to map the pulsatile strain in the carotid artery wall. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18581403      PMCID: PMC2886512          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  27 in total

1.  Characterizing vulnerable plaque features with intravascular elastography.

Authors:  Johannes A Schaar; Chris L De Korte; Frits Mastik; Chaylendra Strijder; Gerard Pasterkamp; Eric Boersma; Patrick W Serruys; Anton F W Van Der Steen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Stiffness of carotid artery wall material and blood pressure in humans: application to antihypertensive therapy and stroke prevention.

Authors:  M E Safar; J Blacher; J J Mourad; G M London
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Improved cine displacement-encoded MRI using balanced steady-state free precession and time-adaptive sensitivity encoding parallel imaging at 3 T.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Peter Kellman
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Comparison between three-dimensional volume-selective turbo spin-echo imaging and two-dimensional ultrasound for assessing carotid artery structure and function.

Authors:  Lindsey A Crowe; Ben Ariff; Jennifer Keegan; Raad H Mohiaddin; Guang Zhong Yang; Alun D Hughes; Simon A McG Thom; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Mixed echo train acquisition displacement encoding with stimulated echoes: an optimized DENSE method for in vivo functional imaging of the human heart.

Authors:  A H Aletras; H Wen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  In-vivo prediction of human coronary plaque rupture location using intravascular ultrasound and the finite element method.

Authors:  J Ohayon; P Teppaz; G Finet; G Rioufol
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.439

7.  Assessment of vulnerable plaque composition by matching the deformation of a parametric plaque model to measured plaque deformation.

Authors:  Radj A Baldewsing; Johannes A Schaar; Frits Mastik; Cees W J Oomens; Antonius F W van der Steen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  In vivo study of microcirculation in canine myocardium using the IVIM method.

Authors:  Virginie Callot; Eric Bennett; Ulrich K M Decking; Robert S Balaban; Han Wen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Hemodynamics and wall mechanics in human carotid bifurcation and its consequences for atherogenesis: investigation of inter-individual variation.

Authors:  H F Younis; M R Kaazempur-Mofrad; R C Chan; A G Isasi; D P Hinton; A H Chau; L A Kim; R D Kamm
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2004-09

Review 10.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Image-based modeling for better understanding and assessment of atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability: data, modeling, validation, uncertainty and predictions.

Authors:  Dalin Tang; Roger D Kamm; Chun Yang; Jie Zheng; Gador Canton; Richard Bach; Xueying Huang; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jian Zhu; Genshan Ma; Akiko Maehara; Gary S Mintz; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  In vivo diffusion-tensor MRI of the human heart on a 3 tesla clinical scanner: An optimized second order (M2) motion compensated diffusion-preparation approach.

Authors:  Christopher Nguyen; Zhaoyang Fan; Yibin Xie; Jianing Pang; Peter Speier; Xiaoming Bi; Jon Kobashigawa; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Advanced techniques for MRI of atherosclerotic plaque.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Gador Canton
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08

4.  Methods for robust in vivo strain estimation in the carotid artery.

Authors:  M McCormick; T Varghese; X Wang; C Mitchell; M A Kliewer; R J Dempsey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Patient specific characterization of artery and plaque material properties in peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Christopher Noble; Kent D Carlson; Erica Neumann; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Ahmet Erdemir; Amir Lerman; Melissa Young
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-09-27

6.  Transient and microscale deformations and strains measured under exogenous loading by noninvasive magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Deva D Chan; Corey P Neu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Automatic detection of the carotid artery boundary on cross-sectional MR image sequences using a circle model guided dynamic programming.

Authors:  Da-Chuan Cheng; Christian Billich; Shing-Hong Liu; Horst Brunner; Yi-Chen Qiu; Yu-Lin Shen; Hans Jürgen Brambs; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss; Uwe Hw Schütz
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Suppression of artifact-generating echoes in cine DENSE using deep learning.

Authors:  Mohamad Abdi; Xue Feng; Changyu Sun; Kenneth C Bilchick; Craig H Meyer; Frederick H Epstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.737

9.  Feasibility of asymmetric stretch assessment in the ascending aortic wall with DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Henrik Haraldsson; Michael Hope; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; Elaine Tseng; Xiaodong Zhong; Frederick H Epstein; Liang Ge; David Saloner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Anatomical location, sex, and age influence murine arterial circumferential cyclic strain before and during dobutamine infusion.

Authors:  Paige E Castle; Ulrich M Scheven; A Colleen Crouch; Amos A Cao; Craig J Goergen; Joan M Greve
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 4.813

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.