BACKGROUND: In vivo detection of vulnerable plaques is presently limited by a lack of diagnostic tools. Intravascular ultrasound elastography is a new technique based on intravascular ultrasound and has the potential to differentiate between different plaques phenotypes. However, the predictive value of intravascular elastography to detect vulnerable plaques had not been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Postmortem coronary arteries were investigated with intravascular elastography and subsequently processed for histology. In histology, a vulnerable plaque was defined as a plaque consisting of a thin cap (<250 microm) with moderate to heavy macrophage infiltration and at least 40% of atheroma. In elastography, a vulnerable plaque was defined as a plaque with a high strain region at the surface with adjacent low strain regions. In 24 diseased coronary arteries, we studied 54 cross sections. In histology, 26 vulnerable plaques and 28 nonvulnerable plaques were found. Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed a maximum predictive power for a strain value threshold of 1.26%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.85. The sensitivity was 88%, and the specificity was 89% to detect vulnerable plaques. Linear regression showed high correlation between the strain in caps and the amount of macrophages (P<0.006) and an inverse relation between the amount of smooth muscle cells and strain (P<0.0001). Plaques, which are declared vulnerable in elastography, have a thinner cap than nonvulnerable plaques (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular elastography has a high sensitivity and specificity to detect vulnerable plaques in vitro.
BACKGROUND: In vivo detection of vulnerable plaques is presently limited by a lack of diagnostic tools. Intravascular ultrasound elastography is a new technique based on intravascular ultrasound and has the potential to differentiate between different plaques phenotypes. However, the predictive value of intravascular elastography to detect vulnerable plaques had not been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Postmortem coronary arteries were investigated with intravascular elastography and subsequently processed for histology. In histology, a vulnerable plaque was defined as a plaque consisting of a thin cap (<250 microm) with moderate to heavy macrophage infiltration and at least 40% of atheroma. In elastography, a vulnerable plaque was defined as a plaque with a high strain region at the surface with adjacent low strain regions. In 24 diseased coronary arteries, we studied 54 cross sections. In histology, 26 vulnerable plaques and 28 nonvulnerable plaques were found. Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed a maximum predictive power for a strain value threshold of 1.26%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.85. The sensitivity was 88%, and the specificity was 89% to detect vulnerable plaques. Linear regression showed high correlation between the strain in caps and the amount of macrophages (P<0.006) and an inverse relation between the amount of smooth muscle cells and strain (P<0.0001). Plaques, which are declared vulnerable in elastography, have a thinner cap than nonvulnerable plaques (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular elastography has a high sensitivity and specificity to detect vulnerable plaques in vitro.
Authors: Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra Journal: Curr Med Imaging Rev Date: 2011-11
Authors: Gastón A Rodriguez-Granillo; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Héctor M García-García; Pim de Feyter; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-10-18 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Nico Bruining; Johannes A Schaar; Eugene McFadden; Nico Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; Frits Mastik; Jurgen M R Ligthart; Gaston A Rodriguez Granillo; Marco Valgimigli; Georgios Sianos; Willem J van der Giessen; Bianca Backx; Marie-Angele M Morel; Gerrit-Anne Van Es; Jonathon D Sawyer; June Kaplow; Andrew Zalewski; Anton F W van der Steen; Pim de Feyter; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Seemantini K Nadkarni; Brett E Bouma; Tina Helg; Raymond Chan; Elkan Halpern; Alexandra Chau; Milan Singh Minsky; Jason T Motz; Stuart L Houser; Guillermo J Tearney Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gabriela Torres; Tomasz J Czernuszewicz; Jonathon W Homeister; Mark A Farber; Melissa C Caughey; Caterina M Gallippi Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 10.048