Literature DB >> 21170653

[Postkeratoplasty astigmatism: comparison of three suturing techniques].

I Naydis1, M Klemm, A Hassenstein, G Richard, T Katz, S J Linke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was a retrospective analysis of postkeratoplasty astigmatism and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients following penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and a comparison of three suturing techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis penetrating keratoplasty (PK) was carried out on 150 eyes with 3 suturing techniques: single running (SR), double running (DR counterclockwise) and interrupted (IR) sutures. Of the eyes 37 (24.7%) underwent PK with SR sutures, 81 eyes (54%) with DR sutures and 32 eyes (21.3%) had IR. PK for Fuchs' dystrophy was used on 46 eyes (30.7%), on 33 eyes (22%) for keratoconus, on 12 eyes (8%) for herpetic keratitis and on 7 eyes (4.6%) for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. For trephination a guided trephine system (GTS) was used in 44%, rotortrepan in 46.6% and best trepan in 5.3%. Postkeratoplasty astigmatism and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated 1, 4, 12 and 24 months after surgery (all sutures removed). Subjective and objective refractions and corneal topography were performed to assess astigmatism. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (95% significance) was used to evaluate statistical significance.
RESULTS: Mean topographic astigmatism 4 months (12 months/2 years) after keratoplasty was 4.9 dpt (5.3/4.1, n=4) for SR, 4.2 dpt (4.0/5.3) for DR and 9.7 dpt (n=7) (4.9, n=8/6.8, n=2) for IR suturing techniques. Mean objective astigmatism 4 months (12 months/2 years) after PK was 5.9 dpt (4.1, n=7/5.0, n=3) for SR, 3.4 dpt (4.5/4.98) for DR and 8.0 dpt (n=3) (6.9, n=4/7.4, n=2) for IR sutures. Mean refractive cylinder 4 months (12 months/2 years) after keratoplasty was 4.5 dpt (3.9/4.9) for SR, 3.2 dpt (3.3/3.6) for DR and 6.2 dpt (3.7/4.7) for IR suturing. Mean BCVA 4 months (12 months/2 years) was 0.3 (0.3/0.4) for SR, 0.3 (0.4/0.5) for DR and 0.3 (0.4/0.4) for IR sutures. BCVA 4 months (12 months/2 years) after PK (GTS only) reached 0.3 (0.3/0.5) for SR and 0.3 (0.4/0.6) for DR suturing. DISCUSSION: Topographic and objective astigmatisms were highest for the IR suturing technique. Topographic astigmatism and refractive cylinder were less in the DR (compared to SR) group 4 and 12 months after surgery (statistically significant). After suture removal (2 years after PK) refractive cylinder was still lower for DR compared to SR but there was no statistical difference between DR and SR regarding topographic and objective cylinders. For the interpretation of these data it should be emphasized that due to the retrospective character of this analysis the number of patients in the subgroups is decreasing with time and as a consequence single (strongly deviating) measurements can have a more powerful impact on the outcome in the individual subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21170653     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-010-2272-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  21 in total

1.  Long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty using a single or double running suture technique.

Authors:  Leopoldo Spadea; Francesco Cifariello; Guido Bianco; Emilio Balestrazzi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry.

Authors:  K A Williams; D Roder; A Esterman; S M Muehlberg; D J Coster
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  A review of randomized controlled trials of penetrating keratoplasty techniques.

Authors:  N Andrew Frost; Johnny Wu; Tze F Lai; Douglas J Coster
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Clinical and surgical factors influencing corneal graft survival, visual acuity, and astigmatism. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators.

Authors:  A Vail; S M Gore; B A Bradley; D L Easty; C A Rogers; W J Armitate
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  [Long-term outcome after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus--impact of preoperative corneal curvature and best corrected visual acuity on the functional results].

Authors:  A Preclik; A Langenbucher; B Seitz; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Comparison of the effect of three suturing techniques on postkeratoplasty astigmatism in keratoconus.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Javadi; Mostafa Naderi; Mohammad Zare; Ahmad Jenaban; Hossein Mohammad Rabei; Arash Anissian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Femtosecond laser-assisted inverted mushroom keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yanny Y Y Cheng; Nayyirih G Tahzib; Gabriel van Rij; Hugo van Cleynenbreugel; Elisabeth Pels; Fred Hendrikse; Rudy Nuijts
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Keratometric astigmatism after suture removal in penetrating keratoplasty: double running versus single running suture techniques.

Authors:  Joel M Solano; David O Hodge; William M Bourne
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Role of the suture technique.

Authors:  J N Murta; L Amaro; C Tavares; J B Mira
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  The effect of different suturing techniques on astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of non-torque pattern double running suture technique for optical penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Chong-Hui Fan; Yang Gao; Lian Duan; Guang-Fu Dang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

2.  [Toric add-on intraocular lenses for correction of high astigmatism after pseudophakic keratoplasty].

Authors:  A Hassenstein; F Niemeck; K Giannakakis; M Klemm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Perspectives of laser-assisted keratoplasty: current overview and first preliminary results with the picosecond infrared laser (λ = 3 µm)].

Authors:  S J Linke; L Ren; A Frings; J Steinberg; W Wöllmer; T Katz; R Reimer; N O Hansen; N Jowett; G Richard; R J Dwayne Miller
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  A new technology for applanation free corneal trephination: the picosecond infrared laser (PIRL).

Authors:  Stephan J Linke; Andreas Frings; Ling Ren; Amadeus Gomolka; Udo Schumacher; Rudolph Reimer; Nils-Owe Hansen; Nathan Jowett; Gisbert Richard; R J Dwayne Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Penetrating Excimer Laser Keratoplasty with vs without the Homburg Cross-Stitch Marker in Inexperienced Surgeons.

Authors:  Shady Suffo; Mohammed El Halabi; Berthold Seitz; Alaa Din Abdin; Cristian Munteanu; Loay Daas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.