BACKGROUND: Work sites offer a productive setting for physical activity (PA) promoting interventions. Still, PA participation remains low. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the reasoning behind commonly reported barriers and enabling factors to participation in PA programs in a work-site setting. METHODS: Employees from a large city government were recruited to participate in focus groups, stratified by white- and blue-collar occupations. Responses from open-ended questions about factors influencing participation in PA programs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Resulting data were analyzed with open and axial coding. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 60 employees composing 9 focus groups. Although time was the most common barrier between both groups, white-collars workers responded that scheduling and work conflicts were the most common barrier concerning time. Blue-collar workers indicated shift work as their most common barrier. In addition, health was a significant enabling factor for both occupational categories. White-collar workers were much more concerned with appearances and were more highly motivated by weight loss and the hopefulness of quick results than were blue-collar workers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are important in the understanding of PA as it relates to the reasoning behind participation in work-site programs in regard to occupational status.
BACKGROUND: Work sites offer a productive setting for physical activity (PA) promoting interventions. Still, PA participation remains low. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the reasoning behind commonly reported barriers and enabling factors to participation in PA programs in a work-site setting. METHODS: Employees from a large city government were recruited to participate in focus groups, stratified by white- and blue-collar occupations. Responses from open-ended questions about factors influencing participation in PA programs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Resulting data were analyzed with open and axial coding. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 60 employees composing 9 focus groups. Although time was the most common barrier between both groups, white-collars workers responded that scheduling and work conflicts were the most common barrier concerning time. Blue-collar workers indicated shift work as their most common barrier. In addition, health was a significant enabling factor for both occupational categories. White-collar workers were much more concerned with appearances and were more highly motivated by weight loss and the hopefulness of quick results than were blue-collar workers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are important in the understanding of PA as it relates to the reasoning behind participation in work-site programs in regard to occupational status.
Authors: Mette Merete Pedersen; Mette Kreutzfeldt Zebis; Henning Langberg; Otto Melchior Poulsen; Ole Steen Mortensen; Jette Nygaard Jensen; Gisela Sjøgaard; Thomas Bredahl; Lars Louis Andersen Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2013-09
Authors: Anne Rongen; Suzan J W Robroek; Wouter van Ginkel; Dennis Lindeboom; Martin Pet; Alex Burdorf Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Miaomiao Sun; Wenting Feng; Feng Wang; Liuzhuo Zhang; Zijun Wu; Zhimin Li; Bo Zhang; Yonghua He; Shaohua Xie; Mengjie Li; Joan P C Fok; Gary Tse; Martin C S Wong; Jin-Ling Tang; Samuel Y S Wong; Jelle Vlaanderen; Greg Evans; Roel Vermeulen; Lap Ah Tse Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240