| Literature DB >> 34104567 |
Takashi Shimazaki1, Misa Iio2, Hiroaki Uechi3, Koji Takenaka4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Educational health manga are used to promote health behavior change. This study thus seeks to achieve the following objectives: identify the emotional experience of reading educational health manga, understand the effects of facilitating the psychological mediators of behavior change through emotional experiences, and compare the effectiveness of educational health manga with conventional materials.Entities:
Keywords: Emotional experience; behavior change; educational manga; mediator
Year: 2021 PMID: 34104567 PMCID: PMC8159205 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1921583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med ISSN: 2164-2850
Figure 1.Physical activity and healthy diet educational manga.
Note. English translations of dialog with original Japanese version are provided in Additional file 2.
Figure 2.Overview of the present study.
Participants’ characteristics.
| Intervention (Manga condition) | Control | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small change | Habit formation | Relapse prevention | Visual image | Narrative | General | ||||||||||
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||||||||||
| Male | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 0.00 | 5 | 0.00 |
| Female | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | 140 | (50) | |||
| 20–29 | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 0.00 | 20 | 0.00 |
| 30–39 | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | |||
| 40–49 | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | |||
| 50–59 | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | |||
| 60–69 | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | 56 | (20) | |||
| Junior high or high school | 70 | (25) | 84 | (30) | 89 | (32) | 94 | (34) | 79 | (28) | 84 | (30) | 8.78 | 10 | 0.07 |
| University | 171 | (61) | 154 | (55) | 146 | (52) | 152 | (54) | 160 | (57) | 161 | (58) | |||
| Graduate school | 39 | (14) | 42 | (15) | 45 | (16) | 34 | (12) | 41 | (15) | 35 | (13) | |||
| Do not practice | 72 | (26) | 80 | (29) | 92 | (33) | 87 | (31) | 69 | (25) | 94 | (34) | 11.63 | 10 | 0.08 |
| Practicing but not habitual | 140 | (50) | 135 | (48) | 123 | (44) | 125 | (45) | 150 | (54) | 126 | (45) | |||
| Practicing habitually | 68 | (24) | 65 | (23) | 65 | (23) | 68 | (24) | 61 | (22) | 60 | (21) | |||
| Yes | 115 | (41) | 125 | (45) | 129 | (46) | 118 | (42) | 125 | (45) | 107 | (38) | 4.80 | 5 | 0.05 |
| No | 165 | (59) | 155 | (55) | 151 | (54) | 162 | (58) | 155 | (55) | 173 | (62) | |||
| Yes | 139 | (50) | 146 | (52) | 130 | (46) | 147 | (53) | 139 | (50) | 151 | (54) | 4.06 | 5 | 0.05 |
| No | 141 | (50) | 134 | (48) | 150 | (54) | 133 | (48) | 141 | (50) | 129 | (46) | |||
| No | 194 | (69) | 194 | (69) | 210 | (75) | 199 | (71) | 187 | (67) | 203 | (73) | 7.22 | 10 | 0.14 |
| Home nursing care | 16 | (6) | 20 | (7) | 13 | (5) | 16 | (6) | 19 | (7) | 12 | (4) | |||
| Live apart nursing care | 70 | (25) | 66 | (24) | 57 | (20) | 65 | (23) | 74 | (26) | 65 | (23) | |||
| Permanent employment | 119 | (43) | 134 | (48) | 103 | (37) | 122 | (44) | 117 | (42) | 116 | (41) | 32.32 | 30 | 0.14 |
| Non-regular employment | 57 | (20) | 41 | (15) | 60 | (21) | 57 | (20) | 66 | (24) | 51 | (18) | |||
| Self-employment | 14 | (5) | 13 | (5) | 23 | (8) | 24 | (9) | 18 | (6) | 16 | (6) | |||
| Housekeeper | 51 | (18) | 44 | (16) | 43 | (15) | 44 | (16) | 39 | (14) | 60 | (21) | |||
| Retirement | 12 | (4) | 13 | (5) | 15 | (5) | 9 | (3) | 12 | (4) | 10 | (4) | |||
| Not working | 15 | (5) | 27 | (10) | 24 | (9) | 16 | (6) | 18 | (6) | 17 | (6) | |||
| No response | 12 | (4) | 8 | (3) | 12 | (4) | 8 | (3) | 10 | (4) | 10 | (4) | |||
| Legal working hours (<8) | 119 | (43) | 118 | (42) | 113 | (40) | 118 | (42) | 131 | (47) | 120 | (43) | 16.06 | 20 | 0.10 |
| Acceptable over time working (<12) | 60 | (21) | 61 | (22) | 68 | (24) | 75 | (27) | 60 | (21) | 58 | (21) | |||
| Critical overwork (>12) | 9 | (3) | 9 | (3) | 4 | (1) | 10 | (4) | 10 | (4) | 5 | (2) | |||
| Not working | 78 | (28) | 84 | (30) | 82 | (29) | 69 | (25) | 69 | (25) | 87 | (31) | |||
| No response | 14 | (5) | 8 | (3) | 13 | (5) | 8 | (3) | 10 | (4) | 10 | (4) | |||
Structure of the emotional experience of reading health promotion manga.
| Factor | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| I felt a sense of crisis with respect to my health condition. | 2.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.08 | −0.10 | −0.16 |
| I felt uneasy about my future health condition. | 3.00 | 0.97 | 0.79 | −0.20 | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| I realized my neglect of health. | 3.05 | 0.96 | 0.76 | 0.07 | −0.04 | 0.03 |
| The speech and behavior of the characters felt as if they were my own. | 2.99 | 0.97 | 0.51 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.30 |
| I imagined my future in which I continued my current lifestyle. | 3.22 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.03 |
| I felt the content of the story was familiar. | 3.28 | 0.92 | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.05 | 0.09 |
| I felt that the characters were likely to exist in reality. | 3.39 | 0.95 | −0.02 | 0.69 | −0.18 | 0.31 |
| I was able to enjoy reading the contents of the health information. | 3.29 | 0.92 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 0.14 | −0.01 |
| I felt that the content of the health information was interesting. | 3.18 | 0.89 | 0.03 | 0.63 | 0.28 | −0.10 |
| I was satisfied to know about health. | 3.30 | 0.84 | −0.07 | 0.10 | 0.76 | 0.11 |
| I was happy to know about health. | 3.26 | 0.87 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.69 | −0.09 |
| It provided the inspiration to think about the current state of my own health situation. | 3.28 | 0.89 | 0.12 | −0.02 | 0.52 | 0.28 |
| I felt that the recommended content was realistic. | 3.46 | 0.88 | −0.03 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.62 |
| I empathized with the speech and behavior of the characters. | 3.56 | 0.90 | −0.13 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.56 |
| I felt that the content is also related to my current self. | 3.24 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
Figure 3.Accepted model of the relationship between the emotional experience of reading health educational manga and readiness of behavior change.
Note. Only significant paths were demonstrated. Standardized path coefficients are showed in brackets behind unstandardized path coefficients. Variance is described outside of the latent variables and error variables. Covariance and correlation are shown in brackets with double arrows. SE: self-efficacy, SN: subjective norm. *p<.05, **p<.01.
Difference in emotional experience among the six conditions.
| Intervention | Control | Post-hoc analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCa | HFb | RPc | Visual imaged | Narrativee | Generalf | ||||||
| Risk | 3.20 | 3.21 | 3.25 | 2.97 | 2.87 | 2.80 | 3.55** | 5 | 0.10 | a-e* | |
| Perception | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | b-e*, f ** | ||||
| [95%CI] | [3.06, 3.33] | [3.08, 3.33] | [3.11, 3.39] | [2.83, 3.10] | [2.74, 3.01] | [2.66, 2.93] | c-e*, f ** | ||||
| Familiarity | 3.53 | 3.45 | 3.51 | 3.30 | 3.08 | 2.84 | 15.20** | 5 | 0.21 | a-e**, f** | |
| 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | b-e**, f** | |||||
| [95%CI] | [3.40, 3.66] | [3.33, 3.56] | [3.38, 3.64] | [3.18, 3.43] | [2.96, 3.21] | [2.72, 2.97] | c-e**, f** | ||||
| Satisfaction | 3.48 | 3.45 | 3.53 | 3.14 | 3.05 | 3.03 | 4.26** | 5 | 0.11 | a-d*, e**, f** | |
| 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | b-d*, e**, f** | |||||
| [95%CI] | [3.34, 3.61] | [3.33, 3.56] | [3.40, 3.67] | [3.01, 3.26] | [2.92, 3.17] | [2.90, 3.15] | c-d**, e**, f** | ||||
| Realism | 3.61 | 3.53 | 3.69 | 3.38 | 3.18 | 3.13 | 7.67** | 5 | 0.15 | a-e**, f** | |
| 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | b-e*, f** | |||||
| [95%CI] | [3.48, 3.73] | [3.42, 3.64] | [3.56, 3.82] | [3.26, 3.51] | [3.06, 3.31] | [3.01, 3.26] | c-e**, f** | ||||
| Total | 3.42 | 3.38 | 3.46 | 3.17 | 3.03 | 2.92 | 8.36** | 5 | 0.16 | a-e**,f** | |
| 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | b-e**, f** | |||||
| [95%CI] | [3.31, 3.54] | [3.28, 3.48] | [3.35, 3.58] | [3.06, 3.28] | [2.92, 3.14] | [2.81, 3.03] | c-e**, f** | ||||
Note. Results of post-hoc analysis are shown as letters corresponding to the superscript letters indicating the names of six conditions; SC: Small change; HF: Habit formation; RP: Relapse prevention. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Psychological readiness change via intervention materials.
| Intervention | Control | Post-hoc analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCa | HFb | RPc | Visual imaged | Narrativee | Generalf | ||||||
| SE | 3.44 | 3.35 | 3.44 | 3.29 | 3.14 | 3.14 | 3.50** | 5 | 0.10 | ||
| 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||||||
| [95%CI] | [3.32, 3.56] | [3.24, 3.45] | [3.32, 3.56] | [3.18,3.41] | [3.03, 3.26] | [3.02, 3.25] | |||||
| Intention | 3.43 | 3.39 | 3.51 | 3.22 | 3.08 | 3.14 | 3.17** | 5 | 0.10 | a-e* | |
| 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||||||
| [95%CI] | [3.30, 3.57] | [3.27, 3.51] | [3.38, 3.64] | [3.09, 3.34] | [2.96, 3.21] | [3.01, 3.27] | c-e**, f* | ||||
| Motivation | 3.36 | 3.33 | 3.50 | 3.16 | 3.00 | 3.13 | 3.05** | 5 | 0.10 | ||
| 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | ||||||
| [95%CI] | [3.20, 3.52] | [3.19, 3.47] | [3.33, 3.66] | [3.01, 3.32] | [2.85, 3.16] | [2.97, 3.28] | c-e** | ||||
| Attitude | 3.53 | 3.42 | 3.57 | 3.25 | 3.08 | 3.12 | 3.85** | 5 | 0.11 | a-e**, a-f* | |
| 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||
| [95%CI] | [3.39, 3.68] | [3.29, 3.55] | [3.42, 3.72] | [3.11, 3.39] | [2.94, 3.22] | [2.97, 3.26] | c-e**, f** | ||||
| SN | 3.29 | 3.19 | 3.28 | 3.14 | 3.01 | 3.01 | 1.77 | 5 | 0.07 | ||
| 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||
| [95%CI] | [3.14, 3.44] | [3.06, 3.32] | [3.13, 3.43] | [2.99, 3.28] | [2.86, 3.15] | [2.87, 3.16] | |||||
| Knowledge | 3.58 | 3.43 | 3.60 | 3.12 | 3.01 | 3.14 | 4.23** | 5 | 0.11 | a-d*, e**, f* | |
| 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | b-e* | |||||
| [95%CI] | [3.42, 3.74] | [3.29, 3.56] | [3.45, 3.76] | [2.97, 3.27] | [2.86, 3.16] | [2.99, 3.29] | c-d**, e**, f* | ||||
| Recall | 3.49 | 3.40 | 3.53 | 3.26 | 3.11 | 3.14 | 3.20** | 5 | 0.10 | a-e* | |
| 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||
| [95%CI] | [3.34, 3.63] | [3.27, 3.53] | [3.39, 3.68] | [3.13, 3.40] | [2.97, 3.24] | [3.00, 3.27] | c-e*, f* | ||||
Note. Results of post-hoc analysis are shown as letters corresponding to the superscript letters indicating the names of the six conditions; SC: Small change; HF: Habit formation; RP: Relapse prevention; SE: self-efficacy; SN: subjective norm. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.