Literature DB >> 18578603

A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect.

Karuna Subramaniam1, John Kounios, Todd B Parrish, Mark Jung-Beeman.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that people solve insight or creative problems better when in a positive mood (assessed or induced), although the precise mechanisms and neural substrates of this facilitation remain unclear. We assessed mood and personality variables in 79 participants before they attempted to solve problems that can be solved by either an insight or an analytic strategy. Participants higher in positive mood solved more problems, and specifically more with insight, compared with participants lower in positive mood. fMRI was performed on 27 of the participants while they solved problems. Positive mood (and to a lesser extent and in the opposite direction, anxiety) was associated with changes in brain activity during a preparatory interval preceding each solved problem; modulation of preparatory activity in several areas biased people to solve either with insight or analytically. Analyses examined whether (a) positive mood modulated activity in brain areas showing responsivity during preparation; (b) positive mood modulated activity in areas showing stronger activity for insight than noninsight trials either during preparation or solution; and (c) insight effects occurred in areas that showed mood-related effects during preparation. Across three analyses, the ACC showed sensitivity to both mood and insight, demonstrating that positive mood alters preparatory activity in ACC, biasing participants to engage in processing conducive to insight solving. This result suggests that positive mood enhances insight, at least in part, by modulating attention and cognitive control mechanisms via ACC, perhaps enhancing sensitivity to detect non-prepotent solution candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18578603     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  76 in total

1.  Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Marissa A Gorlick; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-12

2.  Intuition, insight, and the right hemisphere: Emergence of higher sociocognitive functions.

Authors:  Simon M McCrea
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2010-03-03

3.  Beyond arousal and valence: the importance of the biological versus social relevance of emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Kazuhisa Niki; Mara Mather
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Sometimes happy people focus on the trees and sad people focus on the forest: context-dependent effects of mood in impression formation.

Authors:  Matthew Hunsinger; Linda M Isbell; Gerald L Clore
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-09-28

5.  Common and distinct brain networks underlying verbal and visual creativity.

Authors:  Wenfeng Zhu; Qunlin Chen; Lingxiang Xia; Roger E Beaty; Wenjing Yang; Fang Tian; Jiangzhou Sun; Guikang Cao; Qinglin Zhang; Xu Chen; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering.

Authors:  Kalina Christoff; Alan M Gordon; Jonathan Smallwood; Rachelle Smith; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding.

Authors:  Taylor W Schmitz; Eve De Rosa; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Affective modulation of cognitive control is determined by performance-contingency and mediated by ventromedial prefrontal and cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Joseph A King; Franziska M Korb; Ruth M Krebs; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions.

Authors:  Carola Salvi; Emanuela Bricolo; John Kounios; Edward Bowden; Mark Beeman
Journal:  Think Reason       Date:  2016-02-05

10.  Suppressed semantic information accelerates analytic problem solving.

Authors:  Darya L Zabelina; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Laura Ortega; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki; Mark Beeman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.