Literature DB >> 21957087

Sometimes happy people focus on the trees and sad people focus on the forest: context-dependent effects of mood in impression formation.

Matthew Hunsinger1, Linda M Isbell, Gerald L Clore.   

Abstract

Research indicates that affect influences whether people focus on categorical or behavioral information during impression formation. One explanation is that affect confers its value on whatever cognitive inclinations are most accessible in a given situation. Three studies tested this malleable mood effects hypothesis, predicting that happy moods should maintain and unhappy moods should inhibit situationally dominant thinking styles. Participants completed an impression formation task that included categorical and behavioral information. Consistent with the proposed hypothesis, no fixed relation between mood and processing emerged. Whether happy moods led to judgments reflecting category-level or behavior-level information depended on whether participants were led to focus on the their immediate psychological state (i.e., current affective experience; Studies 1 and 2) or physical environment (i.e., an unexpected odor; Study 3). Consistent with research on socially situated cognition, these results demonstrate that the same affective state can trigger entirely different thinking styles depending on the context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21957087      PMCID: PMC4116487          DOI: 10.1177/0146167211424166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  34 in total

1.  On perceptual readiness.

Authors:  J S BRUNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Mood and global-local focus: priming a local focus reverses the link between mood and global-local processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Huntsinger; Gerald L Clore; Yoav Bar-Anan
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought.

Authors:  Gerald L Clore; Jeffrey R Huntsinger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Overt head movements and persuasion: a self-validation analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Briñol; Richard E Petty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-06

6.  On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error.

Authors:  J P Forgas
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-08

Review 7.  Social cognition: thinking categorically about others.

Authors:  C N Macrae; G V Bodenhausen
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Briñol; Richard E Petty; Jamie Barden
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-11

9.  A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect.

Authors:  Karuna Subramaniam; John Kounios; Todd B Parrish; Mark Jung-Beeman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention.

Authors:  Philip A Gable; Eddie Harmon-Jones
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  The effect of observers' mood on the local processing of emotional faces: evidence from short-lived and prolonged mood States.

Authors:  Setareh Mokhtari; Heather Buttle
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-03-31

2.  Internal valence modulates the speed of object recognition.

Authors:  Matthew F Panichello; Kestutis Kveraga; Maximilien Chaumon; Moshe Bar; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  What is in the feedback? Effect of induced happiness vs. sadness on probabilistic learning with vs. without exploration.

Authors:  Jasmina Bakic; Rudi De Raedt; Marieke Jepma; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Power boosts reliance on preferred processing styles.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kossowska; Ana Guinote; Paweł Strojny
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2016-02-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.