Literature DB >> 18578107

Field testing, refinement, and psychometric evaluation of a new measure of quality of care for assisted living.

Marilyn J Rantz1, Myra A Aud, Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher, David R Mehr, Gregory F Petroski, Steven V Owen, Richard W Madsen, Marcia Flesner, Vicki Conn, Meridean Maas.   

Abstract

Field test results are reported for the Observable Indicators of Nursing Home Care Quality Instrument-Assisted Living Version, an instrument designed to measure the quality of care in assisted living facilities after a brief 30-minute walk-through. The OIQ-AL was tested in 207 assisted-living facilities in two states using classical test theory, generalizability theory, and exploratory factor analysis. The 34-item scale has a coherent six-factor structure that conceptually describes the multidimensional concept of care quality in assisted living. The six factors can be logically clustered into process (Homelike and Caring, 21 items) and structure (Access and Choice; Lighting; Plants and Pets; Outdoor Spaces) subscales and for a total quality score. Classical test theory results indicate most subscales and the total quality score from the OIQ-AL have acceptable interrater, test-retest, and strong internal consistency reliabilities. Generalizability theory analyses reveal that dependability of scores from the instrument are strong, particularly by including a second observer who conducts a site visit and independently completes an instrument, or by a single observer conducting two site visits and completing instruments during each visit. Scoring guidelines based on the total sample of observations (N = 358) help guide those who want to use the measure to interpret both subscale and total scores. Content validity was supported by two expert panels of people experienced in the assisted-living field, and a content validity index calculated for the first version of the scale is high (3.43 on a four-point scale). The OIQ-AL gives reliable and valid scores for researchers, and may be useful for consumers, providers, and others interested in measuring quality of care in assisted-living facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18578107      PMCID: PMC3254215          DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.16.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Meas        ISSN: 1061-3749


  16 in total

Review 1.  Initial field testing of an instrument to measure: observable indicators of nursing home care quality.

Authors:  M J Rantz; D R Mehr; G F Petroski; R W Madsen; L L Popejoy; L L Hicks; V S Conn; V T Grando; D D Wipke-Tevis; J Bostick; R Porter; M Zwygart-Stauffacher; M Maas
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.597

2.  Coordinating services across the continuum of health, housing, and supportive services.

Authors:  Robert Mollica
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2003-02

3.  Quality concerns in assisted living facilities.

Authors:  Myra A Aud; Marilyn J Rantz
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.597

4.  Consumer satisfaction in long-term care: state initiatives in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.

Authors:  Timothy J Lowe; Judith A Lucas; Nicholas G Castle; Joanne P Robinson; Stephen Crystal
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-12

5.  A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J L HORN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Nursing home care quality: a multidimensional theoretical model.

Authors:  M J Rantz; D R Mehr; L Popejoy; M Zwygart-Stauffacher; L L Hicks; V Grando; V S Conn; R Porter; J Scott; M Maas
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.597

Review 7.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Quality of care: problems of measurement. II. Some issues in evaluating the quality of nursing care.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1969-10

9.  The effect of long-term care environments on health outcomes.

Authors:  R A Pruchno; M S Rose
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2000-08

10.  Reporting on QI efforts for internal and external customers.

Authors:  J Dearmin; J Brenner; R Migliori
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1995-06
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Challenge of changing nursing home prescribing culture.

Authors:  Jennifer Tjia; Jerry H Gurwitz; Becky A Briesacher
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2012-01-20

Review 2.  The Seniors' Outdoor Survey: An Observational Tool for Assessing Outdoor Environments at Long-Term Care Settings.

Authors:  Susan Rodiek; Adeleh Nejati; Eric Bardenhagen; Chanam Lee; Giulio Senes
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2014-06-17

3.  Association of Nursing Home Organizational Culture and Staff Perspectives With Variability in Advanced Dementia Care: The ADVANCE Study.

Authors:  Ruth Palan Lopez; Meghan Hendricksen; Ellen P McCarthy; Kathleen M Mazor; Ashley Roach; Anita Hendrix Rogers; Fayron Epps; Kimberly S Johnson; Harriet Akunor; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  ADVANCE: Methodology of a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ruth Palan Lopez; Ellen P McCarthy; Kathleen M Mazor; Meghan Hendricksen; Susan McLennon; Kimberly S Johnson; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 7.538

5.  Perceived Decisional Control as a Mediator between Moving to Assisted Living Due to Caregiver Burden and Relocation Adjustment.

Authors:  Natalie G Regier; Patricia A Parmelee
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.871

6.  Development and psychometric testing of the 5Senses screening tool for long-term care: a study protocol.

Authors:  Chantal Backman; Janet E Squires
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.