Literature DB >> 18576960

Move it! Visual feedback enhances validity of preferential looking as a measure of individual differences in vocabulary in toddlers.

Sarah E A Killing1, Dorothy V M Bishop.   

Abstract

Forty toddlers aged 20 to 24 months were presented with 32 pairs of images with the auditory stimulus Look followed by the name of the target image (e.g. Look . . . tree) in an intermodal preferential looking (IPL) paradigm. The same series of 16 items was presented first with one image as target and then with the other member of the pair as target. Half the children were given feedback, in the form of movement of the target image at the end of the trial, while the other half were presented with static images. IPL performance was quantified in terms of number of words showing at least 15% increase in proportion of looking time in the post-naming interval. Looking preference for the named item was correlated with parental report of vocabulary, this effect being stronger for those receiving feedback. The correlation with parental report of vocabulary comprehension was .65 for those receiving feedback, but only .37 for those with no feedback. It is concluded that the preferential looking task, which has been widely used in group studies, has the potential to act as a reliable index of comprehension level in individual children, especially when movement feedback is used to maintain attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18576960     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00698.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  7 in total

1.  An Eye-Tracking Study of Receptive Verb Knowledge in Toddlers.

Authors:  Matthew James Valleau; Haruka Konishi; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Evaluating the predictive validity of the computerized comprehension task: comprehension predicts production.

Authors:  Margaret Friend; Sara A Schmitt; Adrianne M Simpson
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-19

3.  Understanding and Assessing Word Comprehension.

Authors:  Beverly A Goldfield; Christina Gencarella; Kevin Fornari
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2015-04-10

4.  Looking and touching: what extant approaches reveal about the structure of early word knowledge.

Authors:  Kristi Hendrickson; Samantha Mitsven; Diane Poulin-Dubois; Pascal Zesiger; Margaret Friend
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-11-28

5.  Onsets and codas in 1.5-year-olds' word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Infants' recognition of meaningful verbal and nonverbal sounds.

Authors:  Alycia Cummings; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Elizabeth Bates; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 7.  Psychophysiological and Eye-Tracking Markers of Speech and Language Processing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: New Options for Difficult-to-Test Populations.

Authors:  Alexandra P Key; Courtney E Venker; Micheal P Sandbank
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2020-11-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.