Literature DB >> 30515512

An Eye-Tracking Study of Receptive Verb Knowledge in Toddlers.

Matthew James Valleau1, Haruka Konishi2, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff3, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek4, Sudha Arunachalam1.   

Abstract

Purpose: We examined receptive verb knowledge in 22- to 24-month-old toddlers with a dynamic video eye-tracking test. The primary goal of the study was to examine the utility of eye-gaze measures that are commonly used to study noun knowledge for studying verb knowledge. Method: Forty typically developing toddlers participated. They viewed 2 videos side by side (e.g., girl clapping, same girl stretching) and were asked to find one of them (e.g., "Where is she clapping?"). Their eye-gaze, recorded by a Tobii T60XL eye-tracking system, was analyzed as a measure of their knowledge of the verb meanings. Noun trials were included as controls. We examined correlations between eye-gaze measures and score on the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 1994), a standard parent report measure of expressive vocabulary to see how well various eye-gaze measures predicted CDI score.
Results: A common measure of knowledge-a 15% increase in looking time to the target video from a baseline phase to the test phase-did correlate with CDI score but operationalized differently for verbs than for nouns. A 2nd common measure, latency of 1st look to the target, correlated with CDI score for nouns, as in previous work, but did not for verbs. A 3rd measure, fixation density, correlated for both nouns and verbs, although the correlation went in different directions. Conclusions: The dynamic nature of videos depicting verb knowledge results in differences in eye-gaze as compared to static images depicting nouns. An eye-tracking assessment of verb knowledge is worthwhile to develop. However, the particular dependent measures used may be different than those used for static images and nouns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30515512      PMCID: PMC6440303          DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  50 in total

1.  Toddlers' attention to intentions-in-action in learning novel action words.

Authors:  Diane Poulin-Dubois; James N Forbes
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2002-01

2.  Developmental changes in the understanding of implied motion in two-dimensional pictures.

Authors:  S L Friedman; M B Stevenson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1975-09

3.  Focusing on the relation: fewer exemplars facilitate children's initial verb learning and extension.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff; Amanda C Brandone
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-07

Review 4.  Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: the neglected end of the spectrum.

Authors:  Helen Tager-Flusberg; Connie Kasari
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.216

5.  Two-year-olds compute syntactic structure on-line.

Authors:  Savita Bernal; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Séverine Millotte; Anne Christophe
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-01-01

6.  Representational change in young children's understanding of familiar verb meaning.

Authors:  J N Forbes; D Poulin-Dubois
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1997-06

7.  Eye-tracking measurements of language processing: developmental differences in children at high risk for ASD.

Authors:  Meia Chita-Tegmark; Sudha Arunachalam; Charles A Nelson; Helen Tager-Flusberg
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-10

8.  Looking in the wrong direction correlates with more accurate word learning.

Authors:  Stanka A Fitneva; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-12-09

9.  At 6-9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns.

Authors:  Elika Bergelson; Daniel Swingley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Eye tracking as a measure of receptive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nancy C Brady; Christa J Anderson; Laura J Hahn; Sara M Obermeier; Leah L Kapa
Journal:  Augment Altern Commun       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.214

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lexical processing of nouns and verbs at 36 months of age predicts concurrent and later vocabulary and school readiness.

Authors:  Ashley Koenig; Sudha Arunachalam; Kimberly J Saudino
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2020-08-26

2.  The syntactic and semantic features of two-year-olds' verb vocabularies: a comparison of typically developing children and late talkers.

Authors:  Sabrina Horvath; Leslie Rescorla; Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2019-01-11

3.  Difference or delay? Syntax, semantics, and verb vocabulary development in typically developing and late-talking toddlers.

Authors:  Sabrina Horvath; Justin B Kueser; Jaelyn Kelly; Arielle Borovsky
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2021-10-04

4.  Consistency and inconsistency in caregiver reporting of vocabulary.

Authors:  Sudha Arunachalam; Valeryia Avtushka; Rhiannon J Luyster; Whitney Guthrie
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  Linguistic context in verb learning: Less is sometimes more.

Authors:  Angela Xiaoxue He; Maxwell Kon; Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2019-10-21

6.  Studying the Real-Time Interpretation of Novel Noun and Verb Meanings in Young Children.

Authors:  Alex de Carvalho; Mireille Babineau; John C Trueswell; Sandra R Waxman; Anne Christophe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-18

7.  Preschool Children's Processing of Events during Verb Learning: Is the Focus on People (Faces) or Their Actions (Hands)?

Authors:  Jane B Childers; Emily Warkentin; Blaire M Porter; Marissa Young; Sneh Lalani; Akila Gopalkrishnan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.