Literature DB >> 18575932

The impact of self-belief on laparoscopic performance of novices and experienced surgeons.

K Maschuw1, T Osei-Agyemang, P Weyers, R Danila, K Bin Dayne, M Rothmund, I Hassan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many professions, nontechnical aspects such as motivation or coping with stress are known to influence performance, success, and outcome. These qualities are assessed and trained in novices for quality and safety reasons. This study explored the impact of self-belief of surgeons on laparoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator (LapSim).
METHODS: Eighteen inexperienced surgical residents (with less than ten laparoscopic procedures performed) and 22 advanced residents (with more than 50 laparoscopic procedures performed) filled out a ten-item questionnaire used for the assessment of the individual sense of general self-efficacy (GSE). Afterward the participants were asked to perform three defined tasks on the LapSim, each at two different levels of difficulty. The tasks consisted of coordination, dissection, and application of clips. To assess laparoscopic performance, the total time to complete the tasks, economy of motion, and damage parameters were analyzed and correlated with the GSE score by means of Bravis-Pearson correlation analysis.
RESULTS: In novices, high GSE scores correlated with more errors and poor economy of motion, while in advanced residents, laparoscopic performance was independent of the level of assessed self-efficacy.
CONCLUSION: In a small sample, high self-belief does not predict success. In novices it negatively correlates with laparoscopic skills, while in advanced residents it is independent of laparoscopic performance. Thus, training aspects seem to be of greater importance for laparoscopic skills. Nevertheless, nontechnical aspects like self-belief, motivation, stress-coping strategies, judgment, decision-making, and leadership should be included in the surgical curriculum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18575932     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9640-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  15 in total

1.  Consultant surgeons' opinion of the skills required of basic surgical trainees.

Authors:  P J Baldwin; A M Paisley; S P Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking.

Authors:  Pat Croskerry
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Safety lessons taken from the airlines.

Authors:  M Müller
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Multidimensional health locus of control: comments on the construct and its measurement.

Authors:  Aleksandra Luszczynska; Ralf Schwarzer
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2005-09

5.  Commentary: The affective imperative: coming to terms with our emotions.

Authors:  Pat Croskerry
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Improvement of surgical skills after a three-day practical course for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Michael Koller; Andreas Zielke; Kai Lehmann; Matthias Rothmund; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Negative stress-coping strategies among novices in surgery correlate with poor virtual laparoscopic performance.

Authors:  I Hassan; P Weyers; K Maschuw; B Dick; B Gerdes; M Rothmund; A Zielke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Teaching surgeons about non-technical skills.

Authors:  R Flin; S Yule; S Paterson-Brown; N Maran; D Rowley; G Youngson
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.392

9.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Human factors and ergonomics in the emergency department.

Authors:  Robert L Wears; Shawna J Perry
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.

Authors:  Katherine Fairhurst; Andrew Strickland; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Do soft skills predict surgical performance?: a single-center randomized controlled trial evaluating predictors of skill acquisition in virtual reality laparoscopy.

Authors:  K Maschuw; K Schlosser; E Kupietz; E P Slater; P Weyers; I Hassan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Coping with stress in surgery: the difficulty of measuring non-technical skills.

Authors:  E Boyle; A M Kennedy; E Doherty; D O'Keeffe; O Traynor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Intraoperative consultation as an instrument of quality management.

Authors:  Wolfgang Teichmann; Wilm Rost; Daniel Thieme; Sven Petersen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Innovations in Endosurgery-Journey into the Past of the Future: To Ride the SILS Bandwagon or Not?

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Kamran Ali; Karan Goyal; Krishan C Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Virtual reality laparoscopy: which potential trainee starts with a higher proficiency level?

Authors:  M Paschold; M Schröder; D W Kauff; T Gorbauch; M Herzer; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Open tracheostomy training: a nationwide survey among Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery residents.

Authors:  Limor Muallem-Kalmovich; Jacob Pitaro; Ayman Asaly; Alex Kessler; Ephraim Eviatar; Moran Shteiner; Tal Marom
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.