Literature DB >> 18574781

Comparison of the acoustic and neural distortion product at 2f1-f2 in normal-hearing adults.

Hala Elsisy1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan.   

Abstract

Input/output functions of the simultaneously recorded acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and neural frequency following-response distortion products (FFR-DP) at 2f1-f2 were evaluated to determine if these two representations of cochlear nonlinearity exhibit similar response behavior, which would suggest shared cochlear generators. Responses were recorded from normal-hearing adults for a tone burst stimulus pair (F1: 500 Hz; F2: 612 Hz) at 40-70 dB nHL. DPOAE responses were recorded from the ear canal, and FFR responses were recorded differentially from scalp electrodes, representing a vertical configuration. The input/output function for FFR-DP revealed a compressive saturating nonlinearity, whereas the DPOAE input/output function exhibited a linear growth at higher intensities following a compressive behavior at moderate levels. Results appear to suggest that cochlear generators may be contributing differentially to the acoustic and the neural distortion products. Also, FFR-DP responses appeared more identifiable and less variable, particularly at lower stimulus levels, than the corresponding DPOAE. These findings may point to a potential benefit of applying FFR testing to complement DPOAE in evaluating cochlear function at low frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18574781     DOI: 10.1080/14992020801987396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  9 in total

1.  Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Xin Luo; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem function.

Authors:  S Dhar; R Abel; J Hornickel; T Nicol; E Skoe; W Zhao; N Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Edward Bartlett
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Brainstem correlates of cochlear nonlinearity measured via the scalp-recorded frequency-following response.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Shaum Bhagat
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.703

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.