Literature DB >> 18574261

Methodology for antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy guideline development: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Holger J Schünemann1, Deborah Cook2, Gordon Guyatt2.   

Abstract

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) invited a panel of experts, researchers, information scientists, and guideline methodologists to develop the eighth edition of ACCP evidence-based guidelines on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. The process began with guideline authors specifying the population, intervention and alternative, and outcomes for each clinical question and defined criteria for eligible articles, including methodologic criteria, for each recommendation. The McMaster University Evidence-Based Practice Center, in collaboration with the guideline authors and methodologists, developed strategies and executed systematic searches for evidence. The resulting guidelines are organized in chapters that present a clear link between the evidence and the resulting recommendations. The panel identified questions in which resource allocation issues were particularly important and obtained input from consultants with expertise in economic analysis for these issues. Authors paid careful attention to the quality of underlying evidence and the balance between risks and benefits, both reflected in grades of recommendations. For recommendations that are particularly sensitive to underlying values and preferences, the panel made explicit the values underlying the recommendations. Thus, the process of making recommendations for the ACCP guidelines included explicit definition of questions, transparent eligibility criteria for including studies, comprehensive searches and methodologic assessment of studies, and specification of values and preferences and resource implications underlying recommendations where particularly relevant. In combination with our previous practice of grading recommendations according to their strength and the methodologic quality of the supporting studies, these methods establish our guideline methodology as evidence based.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18574261     DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  10 in total

1.  Determinants of adverse events in vascular surgery.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Kathryn M McDonald; John M Morton; Ronald L Dalman; Fritz R Bech
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Conflicts of interest among authors of medical guidelines: an analysis of guidelines produced by German specialist societies.

Authors:  Thomas Langer; Susann Conrad; Liat Fishman; Martin Gerken; Sabine Schwarz; Beate Weikert; Günter Ollenschläger; Susanne Weinbrenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Patient safety in plastic surgery: identifying areas for quality improvement efforts.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Kathryn M McDonald; Kim F Rhoads; Catherine M Curtin
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Strategies to enhance venous thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients (SENTRY): a pilot cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Menaka Pai; Nancy S Lloyd; Ji Cheng; Lehana Thabane; Frederick A Spencer; Deborah J Cook; R Brian Haynes; Holger J Schünemann; James D Douketis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Efficacy and safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with fondaparinux in women at risk after cesarean section.

Authors:  Ryuji Kawaguchi; Shoji Haruta; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-10-17

6.  Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Murad; Shahnaz Sultan; Samir Haffar; Fateh Bazerbachi
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2018-02-02

7.  Chances of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing conservative management of early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erica Herrera Cappelletti; Jonas Humann; Rafael Torrejón; Pietro Gambadauro
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 15.610

8.  Eight-step method to build the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway: the case for COPD exacerbation.

Authors:  Cathy Lodewijckx; Marc Decramer; Walter Sermeus; Massimiliano Panella; Svin Deneckere; Kris Vanhaecht
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Analgesia in the emergency department: a GRADE-based evaluation of research evidence and recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Chris Lipp; Raj Dhaliwal; Eddy Lang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  What do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Naomi Fearns; Joanna Kelly; Margaret Callaghan; Karen Graham; Kirsty Loudon; Robin Harbour; Nancy Santesso; Emma McFarlane; Judith Thornton; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.