Literature DB >> 18572239

Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles.

Petras J Kundrotas1, Marc F Lensink, Emil Alexov.   

Abstract

Customary practice in predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes is employment of various docking methods when the structures of separate monomers are known a priori. The alternative approach, i.e. the template-based prediction with pure sequence information as a starting point, is still considered as being inferior mostly due to presumption that the pool of available structures of protein-protein complexes, which can serve as putative templates, is not sufficiently large. Recently, however, several labs have developed databases containing thousands of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes, which enable statistically reliable testing of homology-based algorithms. In this paper we report the results on homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. The method, called HOMology-BAsed COmplex Prediction (HOMBACOP), has two distinctive features: (I) extra weight on aligning interfacial residues in the dynamical programming algorithm, and (II) increased gap penalties for the interfacial segments. The method was tested against our recently developed ProtCom database and against the Boston University protein-protein BENCHMARK. In both cases, models generated were compared to the models built on basis of customarily protein structure initiative (PSI)-BLAST sequence alignments. It was found that existence of homologous (by the means of PSI-BLAST) templates (44% of cases) enables both methods to produce models of good quality, with the profiles method outperforming the PSI-BLAST models (with respect to the percentage of correctly predicted residues on the complex interface and fraction of native interfacial contacts). The models were evaluated according to the CAPRI assessment criteria and about two thirds of the models were found to fall into acceptable and medium-quality categories. The same comparison of a larger set of 463 protein complexes showed again that profiles generate better models. We further demonstrate, using our ProtCom database, the suitability of the profile alignment algorithm in detecting remote homologues between query and template sequences, where the PSI-BLAST method fails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18572239     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol        ISSN: 0141-8130            Impact factor:   6.953


  22 in total

1.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Joël Janin; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Howook Hwang; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Structural templates for modeling homodimers.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser; Joël Janin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Global and local structural similarity in protein-protein complexes: implications for template-based docking.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

5.  Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM.

Authors:  Nurcan Tuncbag; Attila Gursoy; Ruth Nussinov; Ozlem Keskin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  On the role of electrostatics in protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Shawn Witham; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Accuracy of protein-protein binding sites in high-throughput template-based modeling.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  SpaK/SpaR two-component system characterized by a structure-driven domain-fusion method and in vitro phosphorylation studies.

Authors:  Anu Chakicherla; Carol L Ecale Zhou; Martha Ligon Dang; Virginia Rodriguez; J Norman Hansen; Adam Zemla
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  GWIDD: Genome-wide protein docking database.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.