Literature DB >> 18571934

Effects of water stress and high temperature on photosynthetic rates of two species of Prosopis.

Jose Delatorre1, Manuel Pinto, Liliana Cardemil.   

Abstract

The main aim of this research was to compare the photosynthetic responses of two species of Prosopis, Prosopis chilensis (algarrobo) and Prosopis tamarugo (tamarugo) subjected to heat and water stress, to determine how heat shock or water deficit, either individually or combined, affect the photosynthesis of these two species. The photosynthetic rates expressed as a function of photon flow density (PFD) were determined by the O(2) liberated, in seedlings of tamarugo and algarrobo subjected to two water potentials: -0.3 MPa and -2.5 MPa and to three temperatures: 25 degrees C, 35 degrees C and 40 degrees C. Light response curves were constructed to obtain light compensation and light saturation points, maximum photosynthetic rates, quantum yields and dark respiration rates. The photochemical efficiency as the F(v)/F(m) ratio and the amount of RUBISCO were also determined under heat shock, water deficit, and under the combined action of both stress. Photosynthetic rates at a light intensity higher than 500 micromole photons m(-2)s(-1) were not significantly different (P>0.05) between species when measured at 25 degrees C under the same water potential. The maximum photosynthetic rates decreased with temperature in both species and with water deficit in algarrobo. At 40 degrees C and -2.5 MPa, the photosynthetic rate of algarrobo fell to 72% of that of tamarugo. The quantum yield decreased in algarrobo with temperature and water deficit and it was reduced by 50% when the conditions were 40 degrees C and -2.5 MPa. Dark respiration increased by 62% respect to the control at 40 degrees C in tamarugo while remained unchanged in algarrobo. The photochemical efficiency decreased with both, high temperature and water deficit, without differences between species. RUBISCO content increased in algarrobo 35 degrees C. Water deficit reduced the amount of RUBISCO in both species. The results of this work support the conclusion that in both Prosopis species, the interaction between high temperature and water deficit affects photosynthesis responses greater than each individual stress, and that the interactive effect is more pronounce in algarrobo than in tamarugo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18571934     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B        ISSN: 1011-1344            Impact factor:   6.252


  5 in total

1.  A self-photoprotection mechanism helps Stipa baicalensis adapt to future climate change.

Authors:  Xiliang Song; Guangsheng Zhou; Zhenzhu Xu; Xiaomin Lv; Yuhui Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Inter- and intrapopulation variation in the response of tree seedlings to drought: physiological adjustments based on geographical origin, water supply and species.

Authors:  Felipe S Carevic; José Delatorre-Herrera; José Delatorre-Castillo
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.276

3.  Controversies in Midday Water Potential Regulation and Stomatal Behavior Might Result From the Environment, Genotype, and/or Rootstock: Evidence From Carménère and Syrah Grapevine Varieties.

Authors:  Luis Villalobos-González; Mariana Muñoz-Araya; Nicolas Franck; Claudio Pastenes
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Acclimation of foliar respiration and photosynthesis in response to experimental warming in a temperate steppe in northern China.

Authors:  Yonggang Chi; Ming Xu; Ruichang Shen; Qingpeng Yang; Bingru Huang; Shiqiang Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Water Relations and Foliar Isotopic Composition of Prosopis tamarugo Phil., an Endemic Tree of the Atacama Desert Growing at Three Levels of Water Table Depth.

Authors:  Marco Garrido; Paola Silva; Edmundo Acevedo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.753

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.