| Literature DB >> 28948009 |
Felipe S Carevic1, José Delatorre-Herrera1, José Delatorre-Castillo1.
Abstract
Initiatives to restore natural ecosystems have had little success in arid and hyperarid ecosystems. In this context, the natural seedling establishment is particularly affected by drought patterns and climatic variability. Likewise, the effect of plant provenance on forest restoration success remains unclear, although previous studies have concluded that some seed locations might be better able to tolerate water stress. In this study, we examined the physiological mechanisms involved in the drought stress resistance of Prosopis tamarugo and Prosopis alba seedlings from different arid and hyperarid locations of the Atacama Desert in northern Chile. We measured the xylem water potential (Ψ), cuticular transpiration (Ec), specific leaf area (SLA) and pressure-volume curves at the intrapopulation and interpopulation levels of seedlings of both species subjected to three drought-induced treatments. In addition, plant characteristics such as seedling height (Sh), stem diameter (Sd), leaf biomass (Lb), root biomass (Rb) and seedling survival (Ss) were measured during the treatments. Seedlings of most hyperarid habitats had the highest values of Ψ and water content relative to the turgor loss point, as well as decreased SLA, especially during the strongest drought treatment. Ψ was strongly correlated with Sh in both species, and soil humidity was correlated with Sd. This study highlights the high variability of physiological responses to water stress in both species at the interpopulation and intrapopulation levels, which provides us with a powerful seed selection tool for future reforestation programmes aimed at the early selection and genetic improvement of species of the Prosopis genus.Entities:
Keywords: Atacama Desert; Prosopis; drought stress; reforestation; seedling provenances; water relations
Year: 2017 PMID: 28948009 PMCID: PMC5603963 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plx037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Description of each area of collected seeds from the Antofagasta and Tarapaca regions. Data show the collection site, rainfall (mm), spatial geodesic location (WGS 1984), meters above sea level (masl) and seed collected (species).
| ANTOFAGASTA REGION | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Mean annual rainfall | UTM E | UTM S | MASL | SC |
| Quillagua | 0.3 | 443858 | 7606142 | 1146 |
|
| Calama | 2.8 | 505233 | 7511795 | 2342 |
|
| Chiu-Chiu | 5.5 | 536568 | 7529509 | 2533 |
|
| Toconao | 35.7 | 601286 | 7435194 | 2487 |
|
| TARAPACÁ REGION | |||||
| Site | Mean annual rainfall | UTM E | UTM S | MASL | SC |
| Zapiga | 0.6 | 407442 | 7816448 | 1026 |
|
| La Huayca | 0.6 | 438480 | 7741616 | 1099 |
|
| La Tirana | 0.6 | 430328 | 7751433 | 1083 |
|
| Canchones | 0.6 | 442791 | 7736712 | 1125 |
|
| Llamara | 0.5 | 434803 | 7657083 | 1167 |
|
Rainfall (mm) and mean of the minimum and maximum temperatures (°C) at the Estación Experimental Canchones site.
| Month | 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rainfall |
|
| |
| January | 0.6 | 15.3 | 22.1 |
| February | 0.2 | 9.2 | 33.9 |
| March | 0 | 15.9 | 32.2 |
| April | 0 | 8.2 | 33.1 |
| May | 0 | 17.6 | 31.4 |
| June | 0 | 15.4 | 32.3 |
| July | 0.4 | 13.2 | 33.3 |
| August | 0 | 15.8 | 33.6 |
| September | 0 | 18.2 | 34.0 |
| October | 0 | 25.5 | 33.8 |
| November | 0 | 21.9 | 33.6 |
| December | 0 | 13.9 | 31.1 |
Figure 1.Comparison among provenances of P. tamarugo in terms of xylem water potentials (A), SLA (B) and water content relative to turgor loss point (C) parameters. Provenances of Tarapacá and Antofagasta are denoted by white squares and white triangles, respectively. Control seedlings are represented by black figures. Watering supply treatments are denoted in x axis, each with two measurements (see text for information). For each watering supply treatment, statistically significant differences are represented by an asterisk.
Intrapopulation parameters of P. tamarugo. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were registered when T3 was applied.
| Parameter | La Huayca | Zapiga | Toconao | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| SLA (m2 kg−1) | 9.046 | 0.006 | 3.310 | 0.014 | 3.099 | 0.010 |
| RWCc (%) | 19.555 | <0.001 | 1.035 | 0.411 | 2.222 | 0.0435 |
| Ψ (MPa) | 0.444 | 0.511 | 14.680 | <0.001 | 10.098 | <0.001 |
Figure 2.Comparison among provenances of P. alba in terms of xylem water potentials (A) and SLA (B). Provenances of Tarapacá and Antofagasta are denoted by white squares and white triangles, respectively. Control seedlings are represented by black figures. Watering supply treatments are denoted in x axis, each with two measurements (see text for information). For each watering supply treatment, statistically significant differences are represented by an asterisk.
Intrapopulation parameters of P. alba. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were registered when T3 was applied.
| Parameter | Quillagua | Chiu-Chiu | La Huayca | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ec (µmol H2O kg−1 s−1) | 0.03 | 1.345 | 11.086 | <0.001 | 10.345 | <0.001 |
| SLA (m2 kg−1) | 9.111 | <0.001 | 2.123 | 0.023 | 1.000 | 0.657 |
| RWCc (%) | 16.432 | <0.001 | 11.111 | <0.001 | 9.456 | <0.001 |
| Ψ (MPa) | 0.564 | 0.531 | 10.598 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.987 |
| Sh (mm) | 22.765 | <0.01 | 3.456 | 0.963 | 19.875 | <0.01 |
Figure 3.Relationship between xylem water potentials (Ψ) and seedling height for P. tamarugo (black figures) and P. alba (white figures).
Figure 4.Dry biomass of leaves of P. tamarugo (white columns) and P. alba (black columns) during each watering treatment induced. Differences are denoted by different letters.