| Literature DB >> 27064665 |
Marco Garrido1, Paola Silva2, Edmundo Acevedo2.
Abstract
Prosopis tamarugo Phil. is a strict phreatophyte tree species endemic to the "Pampa del Tamarugal", Atacama Desert. The extraction of water for various uses has increased the depth of the water table in the Pampa aquifers threatening its conservation. This study aimed to determine the effect of the groundwater table depth on the water relations of P. tamarugo and to present thresholds of groundwater depth (GWD) that can be used in the groundwater management of the P. tamarugo ecosystem. Three levels of GWD, 11.2 ± 0.3 m, 10.3 ± 0.3 m, and 7.1 ± 0.1 m, (the last GWD being our reference) were selected and groups of four individuals per GWD were studied in the months of January and July of the years 2011 through 2014. When the water table depth exceeded 10 m, P. tamarugo had lower pre-dawn and mid-day water potential but no differences were observed in minimum leaf stomatal resistance when compared to the condition of 7.1 m GWD; the leaf tissue increased its δ(13)C and δ(18)O composition. Furthermore, a smaller green canopy fraction of the trees and increased foliage loss in winter with increasing water table depth was observed. The differences observed in the physiological behavior of P. tamarugo trees, attributable to the ground water depth; show that increasing the depth of the water table from 7 to 11 m significantly affects the water status of P. tamarugo. The results indicate that P. tamarugo has an anisohydric stomatal behavior and that given a reduction in water supply it regulates the water demand via foliage loss. The growth and leaf physiological activities are highly sensitive to GWD. The foliage loss appears to prevent the trees from reaching water potentials leading to complete loss of hydraulic functionality by cavitation. The balance achieved between water supply and demand was reflected in the low variation of the water potential and of the variables related to gas exchange over time for a given GWD. This acclimation capacity of P. tamarugo after experiencing increases in GWD has great value for the implementation of conservation strategies. The thresholds presented in this paper should prove useful for conservation purposes of this unique species.Entities:
Keywords: 13C isotopic composition; 18O isotopic composition; phreatophyte; stomatal behavior; water table depth
Year: 2016 PMID: 27064665 PMCID: PMC4811898 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Meteorological data from a meteorological station for the time of measurements (see text), mean monthly values for daily mean temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed; maximum solar radiation in the month and total rainfall.
| Temperature (°C) | 20.5 | 21.1 | 21.4 | 21.5 | 21.1 ± 0.4 | |
| Relative Humidity (%) | 44.0 | 48.3 | 43.0 | 50.6 | 46.5 ± 3.6 | |
| Wind speed (ms−1) | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 ± 0 | |
| Maximum solar radiation (Wm−2) | 1059.2 | 1014.5 | 1067.8 | 1050.3 | 1047.9 ± 23.4 | |
| Rainfall (mm) | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 ± 1.6 | |
| Temperature (°C) | 13.7 | 16.1 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 14.3 ± 1.4 | |
| Relative Humidity (%) | 45.4 | 27.3 | 32.2 | 32.5 | 34.3 ± 7.8 | |
| Wind speed (ms−1) | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | |
| Maximum solar radiation (Wm−2) | 704.9 | 685.6 | 745.2 | 795.6 | 732.8 ± 48.6 | |
| Rainfall (mm) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.25 ± 0.2 | |
Canchones Experiment Station, commune of Pozo al Monte, Tamarugal Province. (19K 444490.5 m E; 7739128.5 m S). Rainfall during this period was 5.2 mm, practically nil.
Amount of rainfall between January and June.
Amount of rainfall between July and December.
Estimated mean water table depths ± SD in a transect away from water extraction wells at the Llamara Salt Flat, Pampa del Tamarugal, Atacama Desert.
| Dec-05 | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.5 |
| Jan-11 | 11.1 ± 0.0 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.2 |
| Jul-11 | 10.5 ± 0.2 | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 7.0 ± 0.2 |
| Jan-12 | 11.4 ± 0.0 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 7.1 ± 0.3 |
| Jul-12 | 11.1 ± 0.2 | 10.2 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.2 |
| Jan-13 | 11.3 ± 0.2 | 10.2 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 0.2 |
| Jul-13 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 10.4 ± 0.6 | 7.2 ± 0.2 |
| Jan-14 | 11.6 ± 0.1 | 10.6 ± 0.5 | 7.3 ± 0.2 |
| Jul-14 | 11.3 ± 0.2 | 10.5 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 0.2 |
| Mean between Jan-11 and Jul-14 | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 7.1 ± 0.1 |
| Δ between Dec-05 and Jul-14 | 7.3 | 6.2 | 1.4 |
Pumping started in December 2005. High GWD (11.2 m deep, 150 m away from the water extraction well); Mid-GWD (10.3 m deep, 300 m away from the water extraction well); and Low-GWD (7.1 m deep, reference GWD, 3000 m away from the extraction well). Data collected from January 2011 through July 2014.
Water table depth prior to water extraction.
Figure 1Means ± 1 S.E. of (A) predawn water potential, (B) mid-day water potential, (C) stomatal resistance, and (D) weighted mean of soil water content. Each curve within a graph represents a groundwater depth (GWD, High = 11.2 m; Mid = 10.3 m; Low = 7.1 m) between January 2011 and July 2014. The insertions (a; predawn water potential), (b; mid-day water potential), and (d; weighted mean soil water content) represent the mean ± 1 S.E. for each variable at each GWD (n = 32) when there was no significant GWD × measuring date interaction (p > 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences according LSD-Fisher post-hoc analysis.
Figure 2Means ± 1 S.E. of isotopic composition of . The insertions (a) and (b) show the mean values ± 1 S.E. of δ13C at each GWD (n = 16) and at each measuring date (n = 12), respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences according LSD–Fisher post-hoc analysis. *Significant difference at 10% level.
Figure 3Mean of leaf isotopic . The insertions (a) and (b) show the mean ± 1 S.E. of δ18O at each GWD (n = 16) and at each measuring date (n = 12), respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences according LSD–Fisher post-hoc analysis.
Figure 4Means ± 1 S.E. of green canopy fraction (ƒGCC) for three GWDs. Data obtained in January and July from 2011 through 2014 (n = 4). The insertions (a) and (b) show the mean ƒGCC ± 1 S.E. at each GWD (n = 32) (High, Mid, and Low as in Figure 1) and measuring date (n = 12), respectively. Different letters indicate significant differences according LSD–Fisher post-hoc analysis.
Mean values of the relative difference between January and July green canopy fraction (RƒGCC.
| High-GWD | 0.51 | A |
| Mid-GWD | 0.53 | A |
| Low-GWD | 0.20 | B |
| 2011 | 0.50 | A |
| 2012 | 0.38 | B |
| 2013 | 0.42 | AB |
| 2014 | 0.35 | B |
| GWD zone | < 0.0001 | |
| Measuring date | 0.0405 | |
| Interaction | 0.1509 | |
Different letters indicate significant differences according LSD-Fisher post-hoc analysis.