Literature DB >> 18567634

Selection of optimal variants of Gō-like models of proteins through studies of stretching.

Joanna I Sułkowska1, Marek Cieplak.   

Abstract

The Gō-like models of proteins are constructed based on the knowledge of the native conformation. However, there are many possible choices of a Hamiltonian for which the ground state coincides with the native state. Here, we propose to use experimental data on protein stretching to determine what choices are most adequate physically. This criterion is motivated by the fact that stretching processes usually start with the native structure, in the vicinity of which the Gō-like models should work the best. Our selection procedure is applied to 62 different versions of the Gō model and is based on 28 proteins. We consider different potentials, contact maps, local stiffness energies, and energy scales--uniform and nonuniform. In the latter case, the strength of the nonuniformity was governed either by specificity or by properties related to positioning of the side groups. Among them is the simplest variant: uniform couplings with no i, i + 2 contacts. This choice also leads to good folding properties in most cases. We elucidate relationship between the local stiffness described by a potential which involves local chirality and the one which involves dihedral and bond angles. The latter stiffness improves folding but there is little difference between them when it comes to stretching.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567634      PMCID: PMC2547460          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.127233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  59 in total

1.  Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins.

Authors:  Y Zhou; M Karplus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The packing density in proteins: standard radii and volumes.

Authors:  J Tsai; R Taylor; C Chothia; M Gerstein
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Can non-mechanical proteins withstand force? Stretching barnase by atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  R B Best; B Li; A Steward; V Daggett; J Clarke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Pulling geometry defines the mechanical resistance of a beta-sheet protein.

Authors:  David J Brockwell; Emanuele Paci; Rebecca C Zinober; Godfrey S Beddard; Peter D Olmsted; D Alastair Smith; Richard N Perham; Sheena E Radford
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2003-08-17

5.  Stretching of proteins in the entropic limit.

Authors:  Marek Cieplak; Trinh Xuan Hoang; Mark O Robbins
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-01-30

6.  Temperature softening of a protein in single-molecule experiments.

Authors:  Michael Schlierf; Matthias Rief
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Exploring assembly energetics of the 30S ribosomal subunit using an implicit solvent approach.

Authors:  Joanna Trylska; J Andrew McCammon; Charles L Brooks Iii
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  The molecular elasticity of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin.

Authors:  A F Oberhauser; P E Marszalek; H P Erickson; J M Fernandez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-05-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Molecular picture of folding of a small alpha/beta protein.

Authors:  F B Sheinerman; C L Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  LINUS: a hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein.

Authors:  R Srinivasan; G D Rose
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-06
View more
  30 in total

1.  Improvement of structure-based potentials for protein folding by native and nonnative hydrogen bonds.

Authors:  Marta Enciso; Antonio Rey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Protein folding pathways and state transitions described by classical equations of motion of an elastic network model.

Authors:  Gareth Williams; Andrew J Toon
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Wang-Landau simulation of Gō model molecules.

Authors:  Arne Böker; Wolfgang Paul
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Engineering proteins with enhanced mechanical stability by force-specific sequence motifs.

Authors:  Wenzhe Lu; Surendra S Negi; Andres F Oberhauser; Werner Braun
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-02-10

5.  The shadow map: a general contact definition for capturing the dynamics of biomolecular folding and function.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Noel; Paul C Whitford; José N Onuchic
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Stabilizing effect of knots on proteins.

Authors:  Joanna I Sułkowska; Piotr Sulkowski; P Szymczak; Marek Cieplak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dodging the crisis of folding proteins with knots.

Authors:  Joanna I Sułkowska; Piotr Sułkowski; José Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Connecting thermal and mechanical protein (un)folding landscapes.

Authors:  Li Sun; Jeffrey K Noel; Joanna I Sulkowska; Herbert Levine; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  The exclusive effects of chaperonin on the behavior of proteins with 52 knot.

Authors:  Yani Zhao; Pawel Dabrowski-Tumanski; Szymon Niewieczerzal; Joanna I Sulkowska
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Insights from coarse-grained Gō models for protein folding and dynamics.

Authors:  Ronald D Hills; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.