Literature DB >> 18562584

Optimal probe length and target location for electrochemical detection of selected uropathogens at ambient temperature.

Mitra Mastali1, Jane T Babbitt, Yang Li, Elliot M Landaw, Vincent Gau, Bernard M Churchill, David A Haake.   

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated the clinical validity of the rapid detection of uropathogens by use of a DNA biosensor. This assay involves the hybridization of capture and detector probe pairs with bacterial 16S rRNA target molecules to form a DNA-RNA sandwich on the sensor surface. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody binds to the detector probe to enzymatically amplify the hybridization signal. These previous studies involved the hybridization of bacterial 16S rRNA target sequences with 35-mer oligonucleotide probe pairs at 65 degrees C. Achievement of point-of-care technology will be greatly facilitated by ambient-temperature detection. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of probe length and target location on signal intensity using hybridization temperatures of 20 to 25 degrees C. Signal intensity was found to vary dramatically with hybridization location in the species-specific bulge region of 16S rRNA helix 18. Probe pairs of as short as 10 nucleotides in length were able to produce a significant electrochemical signal, and signal intensity was correlated with probe length for probes of 10 to 20 nucleotides in length. The sensitivity of the Escherichia coli-specific 15-mer probe pairs was approximately 330 cells. These shorter probes allowed differentiation of Klebsiella pneumoniae from Proteus mirabilis 16S rRNA target sequences differing by a single nucleotide. A panel of oligonucleotide probe pairs ranging from 11 to 23 nucleotides in length was able to distinguish among seven groups of urinary tract pathogens. In conclusion, we have developed short oligonucleotide probe pairs for the species-specific identification of uropathogens at ambient temperature by use of an electrochemical sensor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18562584      PMCID: PMC2519458          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00423-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  18 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical DNA sensors.

Authors:  T Gregory Drummond; Michael G Hill; Jacqueline K Barton
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Biosensors for the detection of bacteria.

Authors:  Anil K Deisingh; Michael Thompson
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Development of an advanced electrochemical DNA biosensor for bacterial pathogen detection.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Mitra Mastali; Yang Li; Vincent Gau; Marc A Suchard; Jane Babbitt; Jeffrey Gornbein; Elliot M Landaw; Edward R B McCabe; Bernard M Churchill; David A Haake
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  A computer program for choosing optimal oligonucleotides for filter hybridization, sequencing and in vitro amplification of DNA.

Authors:  W Rychlik; R E Rhoads
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics.

Authors:  J SantaLucia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Brosius; M L Palmer; P J Kennedy; H F Noller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of a novel point-of-care system, the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer.

Authors:  K A Erickson; P Wilding
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  A MEMS based amperometric detector for E. coli bacteria using self-assembled monolayers.

Authors:  J J Gau; E H Lan; B Dunn; C M Ho; J C Woo
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 9.  Amperometric biosensors for clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring: a review.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.935

10.  Multiplex FISH analysis of a six-species bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  T Thurnheer; R Gmür; B Guggenheim
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.363

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by sensitive detection of precursor rRNA using a novel electrochemical biosensing platform.

Authors:  Colin Halford; Rodrigo Gonzalez; Susana Campuzano; Bo Hu; Jane T Babbitt; Jun Liu; Joseph Wang; Bernard M Churchill; David A Haake
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Target-specific capture enhances sensitivity of electrochemical detection of bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Mayank Patel; Rodrigo Gonzalez; Colin Halford; Michael A Lewinski; Elliot M Landaw; Bernard M Churchill; David A Haake
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A Microfluidic Cartridge System for Multiplexed Clinical Analysis.

Authors:  Walson Lawi; Chris Wiita; Steven T Snyder; Fang Wei; David Wong; Pak Kin Wong; Joseph C Liao; David Haake; Vincent Gau
Journal:  JALA Charlottesv Va       Date:  2009-12-01

4.  Bacterial detection & identification using electrochemical sensors.

Authors:  Colin Halford; Vincent Gau; Bernard M Churchill; David A Haake
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Clinical validation of integrated nucleic acid and protein detection on an electrochemical biosensor array for urinary tract infection diagnosis.

Authors:  Ruchika Mohan; Kathleen E Mach; Moran Bercovici; Ying Pan; Lakshmi Dhulipala; Pak Kin Wong; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.