Literature DB >> 18561685

Stepwise multi-criteria optimization for robotic radiosurgery.

A Schlaefer1, A Schweikard.   

Abstract

Achieving good conformality and a steep dose gradient around the target volume remains a key aspect of radiosurgery. Clearly, this involves a trade-off between target coverage, conformality of the dose distribution, and sparing of critical structures. Yet, image guidance and robotic beam placement have extended highly conformal dose delivery to extracranial and moving targets. Therefore, the multi-criteria nature of the optimization problem becomes even more apparent, as multiple conflicting clinical goals need to be considered coordinate to obtain an optimal treatment plan. Typically, planning for robotic radiosurgery is based on constrained optimization, namely linear programming. An extension of that approach is presented, such that each of the clinical goals can be addressed separately and in any sequential order. For a set of common clinical goals the mapping to a mathematical objective and a corresponding constraint is defined. The trade-off among the clinical goals is explored by modifying the constraints and optimizing a simple objective, while retaining feasibility of the solution. Moreover, it becomes immediately obvious whether a desired goal can be achieved and where a trade-off is possible. No importance factors or predefined prioritizations of clinical goals are necessary. The presented framework forms the basis for interactive and automated planning procedures. It is demonstrated for a sample case that the linear programming formulation is suitable to search for a clinically optimal treatment, and that the optimization steps can be performed quickly to establish that a Pareto-efficient solution has been found. Furthermore, it is demonstrated how the stepwise approach is preferable compared to modifying importance factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18561685     DOI: 10.1118/1.2900716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  Search for IMRT inverse plans with piecewise constant fluence maps using compressed sensing techniques.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Impact of robotic ultrasound image guidance on plan quality in SBRT of the prostate.

Authors:  Stefan Gerlach; Ivo Kuhlemann; Floris Ernst; Christoph Fürweger; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  An Evaluation of Robotic and Conventional IMRT for Prostate Cancer: Potential for Dose Escalation.

Authors:  Dilini S Pinnaduwage; Martina Descovich; Michael W Lometti; Badri Varad; Mack Roach; Alexander R Gottschalk
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  Robotic ultrasound-guided SBRT of the prostate: feasibility with respect to plan quality.

Authors:  Stefan Gerlach; Ivo Kuhlemann; Philipp Jauer; Ralf Bruder; Floris Ernst; Christoph Fürweger; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Breathing-motion-compensated robotic guided stereotactic body radiation therapy : Patterns of failure analysis.

Authors:  Susanne Stera; Panagiotis Balermpas; Mark K H Chan; Stefan Huttenlocher; Stefan Wurster; Christian Keller; Detlef Imhoff; Dirk Rades; Jürgen Dunst; Claus Rödel; Guido Hildebrandt; Oliver Blanck
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Treatment planning for spinal radiosurgery : A competitive multiplatform benchmark challenge.

Authors:  Christos Moustakis; Mark K H Chan; Jinkoo Kim; Joakim Nilsson; Alanah Bergman; Tewfik J Bichay; Isabel Palazon Cano; Savino Cilla; Francesco Deodato; Raffaela Doro; Jürgen Dunst; Hans Theodor Eich; Pierre Fau; Ming Fong; Uwe Haverkamp; Simon Heinze; Guido Hildebrandt; Detlef Imhoff; Erik de Klerck; Janett Köhn; Ulrike Lambrecht; Britta Loutfi-Krauss; Fatemeh Ebrahimi; Laura Masi; Alan H Mayville; Ante Mestrovic; Maaike Milder; Alessio G Morganti; Dirk Rades; Ulla Ramm; Claus Rödel; Frank-Andre Siebert; Wilhelm den Toom; Lei Wang; Stefan Wurster; Achim Schweikard; Scott G Soltys; Samuel Ryu; Oliver Blanck
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery with an adapted linear accelerator vs. robotic radiosurgery: Comparison of dosimetric treatment plan quality.

Authors:  Harald Treuer; Moritz Hoevels; Klaus Luyken; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Jochen Wirths; Martin Kocher; Maximilian Ruge
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  The impact of target positioning error and tumor size on radiobiological parameters in robotic stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  Takeshi Takizawa; Satoshi Tanabe; Hisashi Nakano; Satoru Utsunomiya; Madoka Sakai; Katsuya Maruyama; Shigekazu Takeuchi; Toshimichi Nakano; Atsushi Ohta; Motoki Kaidu; Hiroyuki Ishikawa; Kiyoshi Onda
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-03-07

9.  Interfraction Anatomical Variability Can Lead to Significantly Increased Rectal Dose for Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Wahl; Martina Descovich; Erin Shugard; Dilini Pinnaduwage; Atchar Sudhyadhom; Albert Chang; Mack Roach; Alexander Gottschalk; Josephine Chen
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-08

10.  Comparison of 3D and 4D Monte Carlo optimization in robotic tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer.

Authors:  Mark K H Chan; Rene Werner; Miriam Ayadi; Oliver Blanck
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.