Literature DB >> 25582532

Framing recommendations to promote prevention behaviors among people at high risk: A simulation study of responses to melanoma genetic test reporting.

Jennifer M Taber1, Lisa G Aspinwall2.   

Abstract

A CDKN2A/p16 mutation confers 76 % lifetime risk of developing melanoma to US residents, and high-risk individuals are counseled to use sunscreen. Generally, for patients at population risk, gain framing more effectively promotes prevention behaviors; however, it is unknown whether loss frames might more effectively promote behavioral intentions and perceived control over disease risk among high-risk patients. Undergraduates (N = 146) underwent a simulated genetic counseling and test reporting session for hereditary melanoma. Participants watched a video of a genetic counselor providing information in which genetic risk of melanoma (Low: 15 %; High: 76 %) and framed recommendations to use sunscreen (Loss: Risk may increase by 15 % if don't use sunscreen; Gain: Risk may decrease by 15 % if use sunscreen) were manipulated. Controlling for baseline sunscreen use, high-risk participants given loss frames reported greater beliefs that sunscreen would reduce risk than high-risk participants given gain frames. Further, high-risk participants with fair skin tended to report greater intentions to use sunscreen when given loss frames versus gain frames. Perceived control over risk mediated the effect of message frame and disease risk on intentions to use sunscreen. When counseling patients with elevated cancer risk, genetic counselors may consider framing prevention behavioral recommendations in terms of potential losses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease risk; Genetic testing; Intentions; Melanoma; Message framing; Perceived control; Prevention behavior; Reflection effect; Response efficacy; Sunscreen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582532     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9808-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

1.  The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women.

Authors:  T R Schneider; P Salovey; A M Apanovitch; J Pizarro; D McCarthy; J Zullo; A J Rothman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 2.  Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kristel M Gallagher; John A Updegraff
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-02

3.  Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; John Weinman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Genetic testing for heart disease susceptibility: potential impact on motivation to quit smoking.

Authors:  S C Sanderson; S Michie
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Impact of genetic risk information and type of disease on perceived risk, anticipated affect, and expected consequences of genetic tests.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Kerry A Sherman; Theresa M Marteau; Paul M Brown
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: the effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making.

Authors:  Roger D Bartels; Kristina M Kelly; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-09

Review 7.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing.

Authors:  A J Rothman; P Salovey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.

Authors:  B E Meyerowitz; S Chaiken
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-03

9.  Prevalence and correlates of sun protection and skin self-examination practices among cutaneous malignant melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Stuart Lessin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-07-20

Review 10.  Translating emerging research on the genetics of smoking into clinical practice: ethical and social considerations.

Authors:  Alexandra Shields; Caryn Lerman; Patrick Sullivan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities.

Authors:  Kathleen F Mittendorf; Sarah Knerr; Tia L Kauffman; Nangel M Lindberg; Katherine P Anderson; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Marian J Gilmore; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; Galen Joseph; Stephanie A Kraft; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  Interactive Beliefs about Genes and Behavior Predict Improved Sun Protection Following Melanoma Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Danielle M Drummond; Tammy K Stump; Wendy K Kohlmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-08-02

3.  Women's attitudes toward practicing cytomegalovirus prevention behaviors.

Authors:  Rosemary Thackeray; Brianna M Magnusson
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-09-28

4.  Effectiveness of message framing on women's intention to perform cytomegalovirus prevention behaviors: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rosemary Thackeray; Brianna M Magnusson; Emily M Christensen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.