Literature DB >> 18558659

The anomalous effects of biased mutation revisited: mean-optimum deviation and apparent directional selection under stabilizing selection.

Xu-Sheng Zhang1, William G Hill.   

Abstract

Empirical evidence indicates that the distribution of the effects of mutations on quantitative traits is not symmetric about zero. Under stabilizing selection in infinite populations with normally distributed mutant effects having a nonzero mean, Waxman and Peck showed that the deviation of the population mean from the optimum is expected to be small. We show by simulation that genetic drift, leptokurtosis of mutational effects, and pleiotropy can increase the mean-optimum deviation greatly, however, and that the apparent directional selection thereby caused can be substantial.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18558659      PMCID: PMC2429868          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.083428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  24 in total

Review 1.  Understanding quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  N H Barton; P D Keightley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Nonequivalent Loci and the distribution of mutant effects.

Authors:  J J Welch; D Waxman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution.

Authors:  E B Kruuk; Jon Slate; Josephine M Pemberton; Sue Brotherstone; Fiona Guinness; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The anomalous effects of biased mutation.

Authors:  D Waxman; J R Peck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  The genetic architecture of quantitative traits: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits.

Authors:  A García-Dorado; C López-Fanjul; A Caballero
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 8.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Mutational bias for body size in rhabditid nematodes.

Authors:  Dejerianne Ostrow; Naomi Phillips; Arián Avalos; Dustin Blanton; Ashley Boggs; Thomas Keller; Laura Levy; Jeffrey Rosenbloom; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  4 in total

1.  Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mutation Rate Evolution in Partially Selfing and Partially Asexual Organisms.

Authors:  Camille Gervais; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Empirical measures of mutational effects define neutral models of regulatory evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Andrea Hodgins-Davis; Fabien Duveau; Elizabeth A Walker; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jeremy J Berg; Graham Coop
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.917

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.