OBJECTIVE: The initiation of atherosclerosis is in part dependent on the hemodynamic shear stress environment promoting a proinflammatory phenotype of the endothelium. Previous studies demonstrated increased expression of ER stress protein and unfolded protein response (UPR) regulator, GRP78, within all vascular cells in atherosclerotic lesions and its regulation in the endothelium by several atherosclerotic stressors; however, regulation of GRP78 by shear stress directly has not been established. METHOD AND RESULTS: Using an in vitro model to simulate human arterial shear stress waveforms, atheroprone or atheroprotective flow was applied to human endothelial cells. GRP78 was found to be significantly upregulated (3-fold) in a sustained manner under atheroprone, but not atheroprotective flow up to 24 hours. This response was dependent on both sustained activation of p38, as well integrin alpha2beta1. Increased GRP78 correlated with the activation of the ER stress sensing element (ERSE1) promoter by atheroprone flow as a marker of the UPR. Shear stress regulated GRP78 through increased protein stability when compared to other flow regulated proteins, such as connexin-43 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1. Increased endothelial expression of GRP78 was also observed in atheroprone versus atheroprotective regions of C57BL6 mice. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a role of the hemodynamic environment in preferentially inducing GRP78 and the UPR in atheroprone regions, before lesion development, and suggests a potential atheroprotective (ie, prosurvival), compensatory effect in response to ER stress within atherosclerotic lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The initiation of atherosclerosis is in part dependent on the hemodynamic shear stress environment promoting a proinflammatory phenotype of the endothelium. Previous studies demonstrated increased expression of ER stress protein and unfolded protein response (UPR) regulator, GRP78, within all vascular cells in atherosclerotic lesions and its regulation in the endothelium by several atherosclerotic stressors; however, regulation of GRP78 by shear stress directly has not been established. METHOD AND RESULTS: Using an in vitro model to simulate human arterial shear stress waveforms, atheroprone or atheroprotective flow was applied to human endothelial cells. GRP78 was found to be significantly upregulated (3-fold) in a sustained manner under atheroprone, but not atheroprotective flow up to 24 hours. This response was dependent on both sustained activation of p38, as well integrin alpha2beta1. Increased GRP78 correlated with the activation of the ER stress sensing element (ERSE1) promoter by atheroprone flow as a marker of the UPR. Shear stress regulated GRP78 through increased protein stability when compared to other flow regulated proteins, such as connexin-43 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1. Increased endothelial expression of GRP78 was also observed in atheroprone versus atheroprotective regions of C57BL6 mice. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a role of the hemodynamic environment in preferentially inducing GRP78 and the UPR in atheroprone regions, before lesion development, and suggests a potential atheroprotective (ie, prosurvival), compensatory effect in response to ER stress within atherosclerotic lesions.
Authors: Xi-Lin Chen; Janice Y Grey; Suzanne Thomas; Fei-Hua Qiu; Russell M Medford; Martin A Wasserman; Charles Kunsch Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2004-06-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Nicole E Hastings; Michael B Simmers; Oliver G McDonald; Brian R Wamhoff; Brett R Blackman Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Peter F Davies; Mete Civelek; Yun Fang; Marie A Guerraty; Anthony G Passerini Journal: Semin Thromb Hemost Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 4.180
Authors: Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Mete Civelek; Elisabetta Manduchi; Gregory R Grant; Christian J Stoeckert; Peter F Davies Journal: Methods Enzymol Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.600