Literature DB >> 7774595

A domain sharing model for active site assembly within the Mu A tetramer during transposition: the enhancer may specify domain contributions.

J Y Yang1, K Kim, M Jayaram, R M Harshey.   

Abstract

The functional configuration of Mu transposase (A protein) is its tetrameric form. We present here a model for the organization of a functional Mu A tetramer. Within the tetramer, assembly of each of the two active sites for Mu end cleavage requires amino acid contributions from the central and C-terminal domains (domains II and III respectively) of at least two Mu A monomers in a trans configuration. The Mu enhancer is likely to function in this assembly process by specifying the two monomers that provide their C-terminal domains for strand cleavage. The Mu B protein is not required in this step. Each of the two active sites for the strand transfer reaction is also organized by domain sharing (but in the reverse mode) between Mu A monomers; i.e. a donor of domain II (also the recipient of domain III) during cleavage is a recipient of domain II (and the donor of domain III) during strand transfer. The function of the Mu B protein (which is required at the strand transfer step) and that of the enhancer element may be analogous in that their interactions with Mu A (domain III and domain I alpha respectively) promote conformations of Mu A conducive to strand cleavage or strand transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7774595      PMCID: PMC398346          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07232.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  40 in total

Review 1.  Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of mu and other elements.

Authors:  K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; T A Baker; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-07-24       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage.

Authors:  M G Surette; G Chaconas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-03-20       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Residues critical for retroviral integrative recombination in a region that is highly conserved among retroviral/retrotransposon integrases and bacterial insertion sequence transposases.

Authors:  J Kulkosky; K S Jones; R A Katz; J P Mack; A M Skalka
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  DNA cleavage in trans by the active site tyrosine during Flp recombination: switching protein partners before exchanging strands.

Authors:  J W Chen; J Lee; M Jayaram
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer.

Authors:  T A Baker; M Mizuuchi; H Savilahti; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Mechanism of site-specific recombination. Logic of assembling recombinase catalytic site from fractional active sites.

Authors:  J Lee; M Jayaram
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Role of the A protein-binding sites in the in vitro transposition of mu DNA. A complex circuit of interactions involving the mu ends and the transpositional enhancer.

Authors:  R G Allison; G Chaconas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Complementation between HIV integrase proteins mutated in different domains.

Authors:  D C van Gent; C Vink; A A Groeneger; R H Plasterk
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Identification of discrete functional domains of HIV-1 integrase and their organization within an active multimeric complex.

Authors:  A Engelman; F D Bushman; R Craigie
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  17 in total

1.  Domain III function of Mu transposase analysed by directed placement of subunits within the transpososome.

Authors:  S Mariconda; S Y Namgoong; K H Yoon; H Jiang; R M Harshey
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Organization and dynamics of the Mu transpososome: recombination by communication between two active sites.

Authors:  T L Williams; E L Jackson; A Carritte; T A Baker
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Trans catalysis in Tn5 transposition.

Authors:  T A Naumann; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Enhancer-independent Mu transposition from two topologically distinct synapses.

Authors:  Zhiqi Yin; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structure-based analysis of HU-DNA binding.

Authors:  Kerren K Swinger; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  The dynamic Mu transpososome: MuB activation prevents disintegration.

Authors:  Kathryn M Lemberg; Caterina T H Schweidenback; Tania A Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Altering the DNA-binding specificity of Mu transposase in vitro.

Authors:  S Y Namgoong; S Sankaralingam; R M Harshey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition.

Authors:  S Y Namgoong; R M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  The Tn7 transposase is a heteromeric complex in which DNA breakage and joining activities are distributed between different gene products.

Authors:  R J Sarnovsky; E W May; N L Craig
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A tetramer of the Flp recombinase silences the trimers within it during resolution of a Holliday junction substrate.

Authors:  J Lee; M Jayaram
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.