Literature DB >> 18555038

Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit.

A D Mackinnon1, R A Billington, E J Adam, D D Dundas, U Patel.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the impact of picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) on reporting times and productivity in a large teaching hospital.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reporting time, defined as the time taken from patient registration to report availability, and productivity, defined as the number of reports issued per whole time equivalent (WTE) radiologist per month, were studied for 2 years pre- and 3 years post-PACS installation. Mean reporting time was calculated for plain radiographs and specialist radiology techniques [computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and nuclear medicine]. Productivity, total department workload, and unreported film rates were also assessed. Pre- and post-PACS findings were compared.
RESULTS: Between 2002-2006 the number of radiological patient episodes increased by 30% from 11,531/month to 15,057/month. This was accompanied by a smaller increase in WTE reporting radiologists, from 32 to 37 (15%). Mean reporting times have improved substantially post-PACS, plain radiograph reporting time decreased by 26% (from 6.8 to 5 days; p=0.002) and specialty modalities by 24% (4.1 to 3.1 days; p<0.001). Radiologist productivity has increased by 18% (337 films to 407 films/WTE radiologist/month). Unreported films have decreased from 5 to 4% for plain radiographs and are steady for specialty modalities (< 1%). In most areas improvements have been sustained over a 3-year period.
CONCLUSION: Since the introduction of PACS, reporting times have decreased by 25% and the productivity improved by 18%. Sustained improvements are felt to reflect the efficiencies and cultural change that accompanied the introduction of PACS and digital dictation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18555038     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  13 in total

1.  Physicians' views and assessments on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in two Turkish public hospitals.

Authors:  Mehmet Top
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  [Ergonomically designed radiology workplace].

Authors:  T Knogler; H Ringl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Evaluating the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems in Newfoundland and Labrador--a cost benefit analysis.

Authors:  Don MacDonald; Doreen Neville
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Limitations in and Solutions for Improving the Functionality of Picture Archiving and Communication System: an Exploratory Study of PACS Professionals' Perspectives.

Authors:  Mona Alhajeri; Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Modifying clinicians use of PACS imaging.

Authors:  Madusha Chandratilleke; Stepfen Honeybul
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  The Impact of a Health IT Changeover on Medical Imaging Department Work Processes and Turnaround Times: A mixed method study.

Authors:  A Georgiou; M Prgomet; S Lymer; A Hordern; L Ridley; J Westbrook
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Effect of Implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication System on Radiologist Reporting Time and Utilization of Radiology Services: A Case Study in Iran.

Authors:  Najmeh Hasani; AghaFatemeh Hosseini; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Isla M Hains; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Murray; Joanne Burns; Carl May; Tracy Finch; Catherine O'Donnell; Paul Wallace; Frances Mair
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  The effectiveness of service delivery initiatives at improving patients' waiting times in clinical radiology departments: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Olisemeke; Y F Chen; K Hemming; A Girling
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.