Literature DB >> 18553157

Preoperative systemic chemotherapy and pathologic assessment of response.

Lajos Pusztai1.   

Abstract

Preoperative systemic (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy is both routine therapeutic modality for locally advanced breast cancer and a translational research model to identify biomarkers that predict treatment response. It is imperative that pathologic response be strongly prognostic in order to optimize the clinical and scientific information that can be gained from neoadjuvant clinical trials. Dichotomization of response as pathologic complete response (pCR) or residual disease (RD) is overly simplistic for these objectives, particularly because residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant treatment includes a broad range of actual responses from near-pCR to frank resistance. More effective or prolonged neoadjuvant treatments should reduce the extent of RD in many patients, possibly blurring the prognostic distinction between pCR and RD. On the other hand, it should be possible to identify patients with resistant disease in order to develop predictive tests for this adverse outcome. Our research group recently proposed to measure residual cancer burden (RCB) as a continuous variable derived from the primary tumor dimensions, cellularity of the tumor bed, and axillary nodal burden. Each component contributes meaningful pathologic information and can be obtained using routine pathologic materials and methods of interpretation that could easily be implemented in routine diagnostic practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18553157     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9070-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  18 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Research issues affecting preoperative systemic therapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; Donald Berry; Lisa A Carey; Marco Colleoni; Mitchell Dowsett; Matthew Ellis; Judy E Garber; David Mankoff; Soonmyung Paik; Lajos Pusztai; Mary Lou Smith; JoAnne Zujewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Florentia Peintinger; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; S E Singletary; Isabelle Bedrosian; Anthony Lucci; Aman U Buzdar; Lajos Pusztai; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axillary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Roman Rouzier; Jean-Marc Extra; Jerzy Klijanienko; Marie-Christine Falcou; Bernard Asselain; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Philippe Vielh; Edwige Bourstyn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel.

Authors:  Ian C Smith; Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Fiona J Gilbert; Antoinne K Ah-See; Oleg Eremin; Leslie G Walker; Tarun K Sarkar; S Peter Eggleton; Keith N Ogston
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Richard Metzger; E Claire Dees; Frances Collichio; Carolyn I Sartor; David W Ollila; Nancy Klauber-DeMore; Jan Halle; Lynda Sawyer; Dominic T Moore; Mark L Graham
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Bryant; N Wolmark; E Mamounas; A Brown; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; M Begovic; A DeCillis; A Robidoux; R G Margolese; A B Cruz; J L Hoehn; A W Lees; N V Dimitrov; H D Bear
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson cancer center experience.

Authors:  Allen M Chen; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Howard D Thames; Mary Jane Oswald; Elesyia D Outlaw; Eric A Strom; Marsha D McNeese; Henry M Kuerer; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary; Fredrick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Aysegul A Sahin; George H Perkins; Naomi R Schechter; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  HER2 expression and efficacy of preoperative paclitaxel/FAC chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice Andre; Chafika Mazouni; Cornelia Liedtke; Shu-Wan Kau; Debby Frye; Marjorie Green; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; W Fraser Symmans; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Novel System for Estimating Residual Disease and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Claire Murphy; Lawrence True; Funda Vakar-Lopez; Jing Xia; Roman Gulati; Bruce Montgomery; Maria Tretiakova
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 2.  Breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and residual disease.

Authors:  Mariana Chávez-MacGregor; Ana María González-Angulo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031.

Authors:  Matthew J Ellis; Vera J Suman; Jeremy Hoog; Li Lin; Jacqueline Snider; Aleix Prat; Joel S Parker; Jingqin Luo; Katherine DeSchryver; D Craig Allred; Laura J Esserman; Gary W Unzeitig; Julie Margenthaler; Gildy V Babiera; P Kelly Marcom; Joseph M Guenther; Mark A Watson; Marilyn Leitch; Kelly Hunt; John A Olson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  HIF-1 activation induces doxorubicin resistance in MCF7 3-D spheroids via P-glycoprotein expression: a potential model of the chemo-resistance of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Sophie Doublier; Dimas C Belisario; Manuela Polimeni; Laura Annaratone; Chiara Riganti; Elena Allia; Dario Ghigo; Amalia Bosia; Anna Sapino
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Morphological and pathological response in primary systemic therapy of patients with breast cancer and the prediction of disease free survival: a single center observational study.

Authors:  Gyongyver Szentmartoni; Anna-Maria Tokes; Timea Tokes; Krisztian Somlai; Attila Marcell Szasz; Laszlo Torgyík; Janina Kulka; Magdolna Dank
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  A Novel Three-Gene Score as a Predictive Biomarker for Pathologically Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Oshi; Fernando A Angarita; Yoshihisa Tokumaru; Li Yan; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.