Literature DB >> 18551275

Determining knee joint alignment using digital photographs.

Holger Schmitt1, Hannes Kappel, Michael T Moser, Eloy Cardenas-Montemayor, Karoly Engelleiter, Benita Kuni, Michael Clarius.   

Abstract

The objective of this work is to find out how reliably knee joint alignment can be measured from a standardized photograph and what influence changes in the standing position have on the angles measured. The interrater, intrarater, and test-retest reliability were evaluated. The influence of image-object distance, the distance between the legs and leg rotation on the measured angles was evaluated. In addition to the digital photographs, 10 full-length radiographs were obtained in an upright position to determine whether the measured angles represent the anatomic axis or mechanical axis. There was high correlation between the interrater (ICC 0.997), intrarater (ICC 0.989) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.904). Only slight deviation was found with the changes in radiograph-object distance (0 degrees -1.8 degrees ). With feet together varus malalignment was greater. Leg rotation showed a strong influence on the measured results (ICC 0.658). The angle measured in the digital photographs reflects the mechanical axis with only slight deviation (0.12 degrees -1.9 degrees ). The measurement of the clinical axis using standardized radiography is highly reliable and can be used for individual follow-up of varus and valgus malalignments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18551275     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0570-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  16 in total

1.  Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images.

Authors:  M Boewer; H Arndt; P A W Ostermann; J Petersein; S Mutze
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Reliability of lower limb frontal plane alignment measurements using plain radiographs and digitized images.

Authors:  Adrian V Specogna; Trevor B Birmingham; Jerome J DaSilva; Jaques S Milner; Jacqueline Kerr; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; Peter J Fowler; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 3.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Radiographic measures of knee alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: effect of weightbearing status and associations with dynamic joint load.

Authors:  Adrian V Specogna; Trevor B Birmingham; Michael A Hunt; Ian C Jones; Thomas R Jenkyn; Peter J Fowler; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The effect of tibial rotation on varus deformity measurement.

Authors:  Heather McCann; Deborah F Stanitski; William R Barfield; John A Leupold; Paul J Nietert
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  [Determination of the axis after totalendoprosthesis of the knee: functional X-ray photography as golden standard].

Authors:  M R Langenbach; J Dohle; H Zirngibl
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

8.  Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment.

Authors:  Michael A Hunt; Peter J Fowler; Trevor B Birmingham; Thomas R Jenkyn; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Do we get a "real" alignment of knee in the preoperative planning of high tibia osteotomy: a prospective study of reproducibility.

Authors:  Teng-Le Huang; Hung-Ta Hondar Wu; Juhn-Cherny Liu; Wei-Ming Chen; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.743

10.  Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement. Short radiographs or long radiographs?

Authors:  D V Patel; B D Ferris; P M Aichroth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  4 in total

1.  Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique.

Authors:  Kilian Reising; Peter C Strohm; Oliver Hauschild; Hagen Schmal; Mohmed Khattab; Norbert P Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Transphyseal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in prepubescent athletes.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; Alexander Barié; Tobias Gotterbarm; Maximilian Keil; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Alignment does not influence cartilage T2 in asymptomatic knee joints.

Authors:  M Sauerschnig; J S Bauer; L Kohn; S Hinterwimmer; S Landwehr; K Woertler; P M Jungmann; W Koestler; P Niemeyer; A B Imhoff; G M Salzmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Various methods for assessing static lower extremity alignment: implications for prospective risk-factor screenings.

Authors:  Anh-Dung Nguyen; Michelle C Boling; Carrie A Slye; Emily M Hartley; Gina L Parisi
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.