Literature DB >> 17472304

Femoral component sizing and positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Paul E Beaulé1, Philippe Poitras.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is now being done on a regular basis with excellent short-term results. Although the technologic improvements are important in achieving improved clinical results, surgical technique and implant positioning are also critical. To minimize the risk of impingement and preserve acetabular bone stock during hip resurfacing arthroplasty, it is important for orthopaedic surgeons to be familiar with the current principles of femoral component sizing and positioning.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17472304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  10 in total

1.  [Imageless computer navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Jochen Nessler; Jürgen Koebke; Joern William Michael; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Imageless navigation of hip resurfacing arthroplasty increases the implant accuracy.

Authors:  C Schnurr; J W P Michael; P Eysel; D P König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; R Bader; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  The young adult with hip impingement: deciding on the optimal intervention.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; David J Allen; John C Clohisy; Perry Schoenecker; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  [Reasons for failure of hip resurfacing implants. A failure analysis based on 250 revision specimens].

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; F Stahmer; J Zustin; G Sauter; M Hahn; M Krause; W Rüther; M Amling
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does hip resurfacing require larger acetabular cups than conventional THA?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Michael S H Kain; Otmar Hersche; Urs Munzinger; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Incidence of groin pain after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Ahmad Bin Nasser; Paul E Beaulé; Michelle O'Neill; Paul R Kim; Anna Fazekas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip resurfacing: expectations and limitations.

Authors:  K De Smet; A Calistri
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.