Literature DB >> 18545879

Videoanoscope-assisted stapled haemorrhoidopexy: analysis of 18 patients.

A D Bozdag1, O Nazli, T Tansug, H Derici, C Kara, A Sozutek.   

Abstract

An optimal stapled haemorrhoidopexy requires the purse-string suture to be placed circumferentially at a constant distance from the dentate line and to pass through an appropriate thickness of rectal mucosa. An unsuitable purse-string suture may increase the risk of postoperative complications. We developed a new anoscope (the videoanoscope) to prevent the difficulties during application of the purse-string suture, and we used the videoanoscope in 18 stapled haemorrhoidopexy procedures. The videoanoscope is made up of three pieces. The front part is in the form of an open half-cylinder. The second piece is a sliding lid that covers the front piece. The rear part of the anoscope includes a hollow handle in which a scope can be inserted, and the whole procedure can be transmitted to a monitor via this scope. The opening on the anoscope can be adjusted by sliding the lid. A purse-string suture is placed on the rectal mucosa protruding through this adjustable opening. The anoscope is rotated to apply the subsequent suture bites and when the starting point is reached again the purse-string is completed. Then the stapled haemorrhoidopexy procedure is continued in the usual fashion. Videoanoscope-assisted stapled haemorrhoidopexy was easily performed in 18 patients (12 men, 6 women; mean age 48.9 years). The mean operative time was 32.8 minutes. The excised rectal mucosal rings were complete in all of the patients. Optimal purse-string depth was reflected in the presence of only mucosa and submucosa in all specimens, without incorporation of muscle cells. Postoperative complications were urinary retention in one patient and bleeding in five patients, one of whom requiring sutures for haemostasis. Further studies are required to assess the potential advantages of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18545879     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-008-0410-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  11 in total

Review 1.  Modified stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of massive circumferentially prolapsing piles.

Authors:  D G Jayne; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Special anoscope for easy purse-string suture application in stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Ali Dogan Bozdag; Okay Nazli; Tugrul Tansug; Hayrullah Derici; Vedat Deniz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Stapled transanal rectal mucosectomy ten years after.

Authors:  M Pescatori; F Aigner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  New devices for stapled rectal mucosectomy: a multicenter experience.

Authors:  F S Pinheiro Regadas; S M Murad Regadas; L V Rodrigues; R Misici; I Tramujas; J B Barreto; M Alvaro Lins; F Roberto Silva; F S P Regadas Filho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented?

Authors:  B Ravo; A Amato; V Bianco; P Boccasanta; C Bottini; A Carriero; G Milito; G Dodi; D Mascagni; S Orsini; R Pietroletti; V Ripetti; G B Tagariello
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work.

Authors:  Margaret D Plocek; Laurie Ann Kondylis; Nadine Duhan-Floyd; John C Reilly; Daniel P Geisler; Philip D Kondylis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.

Authors:  A J Senagore; M Singer; H Abcarian; J Fleshman; M Corman; S Wexner; S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial.

Authors:  A Racalbuto; I Aliotta; G Corsaro; R Lanteri; A Di Cataldo; A Licata
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy; a three and a half year follow up.

Authors:  I Au-Yong; M Rowsell; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.