Literature DB >> 14605834

Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial.

A Racalbuto1, I Aliotta, G Corsaro, R Lanteri, A Di Cataldo, A Licata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The notable success of stapled prolapsectomy in recent years led us to compare this technique with Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in terms of the results obtained both in the immediate postoperative period and in the long term. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed conventional hemorrhoidectomy on 50 randomly selected patients and operated on a further 50 using the stapler technique. The patients were monitored over the immediate postoperative period (e.g., type of anesthesia, mean duration of operation, mean hospitalization time, analgesic administration, time before returning to work) and over a long-term follow-up period of 48 months (later complications such as prolapse relapse, bleeding, stenosis, incontinence).
RESULTS: The stapled group experienced significantly less pain (mean number of analgesic tablets 2.60 vs. 15.9) and returned to normal activity sooner (8.04 vs. 16.9 days), as reported by other authors. In the long-term follow-up at 48 months, stapled hemorrhoidectomy was found to control prolapse, discharge, and bleeding, with no stenosis or significant incontinence, in 94% of cases.
CONCLUSION: Our conclusions confirm the excellent advantages of stapled hemorrhoidectomy which allows the rapid recovery of patients and also promises the complete resolution of hemorrhoidal prolapse in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605834     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-003-0547-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  V W Fazio
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Haemorrhoidectomy: painful choice.

Authors:  A F Engel; Q A Eijsbouts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B J Mehigan; J R Monson; J E Hartley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R Shalaby; A Desoky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ping Lan; Xjiaojian Wu; Xuyu Zhou; Jianping Wang; Longjuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence.

Authors:  Xian Hua Gao; Chuan Gang Fu; Paul Fallah-Wandalachi Nabieu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Anne Eberstein; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Volker Kahlke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Comparison of a modified anoscope and the purse-string anoscope in stapled haemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Ali Dogan Bozdag; Ismail Yaman; Hayrullah Derici; Tugrul Tansug; Vedat Deniz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Gabapentin significantly decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain: a prospective study.

Authors:  Vitaliy Poylin; Jeanne Quinn; Kristin Messer; Deborah Nagle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liesel J Porrett; Jemma K Porrett; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

8.  Intraoperative ligation of residual haemorrhoids after stapled mucosectomy.

Authors:  P Garg
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jong-Sun Kim; Yogesh K Vashist; Sabrina Thieltges; Oliver Zehler; Karim A Gawad; Emre F Yekebas; Jakob R Izbicki; Asad Kutup
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.