| Literature DB >> 18545696 |
Xian-Hong Wang1, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Penelope Vounatsou, Zhao Chen, Jürg Utzinger, Kun Yang, Peter Steinmann, Xiao-Hua Wu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spatial modeling is increasingly utilized to elucidate relationships between demographic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors, and infectious disease prevalence data. However, there is a paucity of studies focusing on spatio-temporal modeling that take into account the uncertainty of diagnostic techniques. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18545696 PMCID: PMC2405951 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Location of the114 S. japonicum-endemic villages and the identified water bodies in Dangtu county, Anhui province, southeastern part of the People's Republic of China in 2004.
Figure 2S. japonicum seroprevalences in the 114 surveyed villages in Dangtu county, Anhui province, southeastern part of the People's Republic of China, from 1995 to 2004.
The number of testing records falling in the 5%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% BCIs of the posterior predictive distribution and the corresponding DIC value when modeling S. japonicum seroprevalence without taking into account the diagnostic error.
| Model specification | Percentage falling in | DIC | ||||
| 5% BCI | 25% BCI | 50% BCI | 75% BCI | 95% BCI | ||
| All covariates, non-spatial | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 16 | 24,316 |
| All covariates, spatio-temporal 1 | 10 | 30 | 50 | 74 | 87 | 9,823 |
| Socioeconomic, spatio-temporal 1 | 9 | 25 | 47 | 72 | 87 | 9,911 |
| Environmental, spatio-temporal 1 | 12 | 28 | 42 | 68 | 92 | 10,624 |
| All covariates, spatio-temporal 2 | 27 | 53 | 73 | 89 | 97 | 2,431 |
| Socioeconomic, spatio-temporal 2 | 28 | 44 | 68 | 86 | 96 | 2,434 |
| Environmental, spatio-temporal 2 | 31 | 56 | 76 | 89 | 97 | 2,428 |
Socioeconomic: only socioeconomic covariates included.
Environmental: only environmental covariates included.
Spatio-temporal 1: independent spatial and temporal random effects assumed.
Spatio-temporal 2: spatial correlations evolving over time assumed.
The number of testing records falling in the 5%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% BCIs of the posterior predictive distribution and the corresponding DIC value when modeling the underlying ‘true’ prevalence of S. japonicum infection.
| Model specification | Percentage (%) falling in | DIC | ||||
| 5% BCI | 25% BCI | 50% BCI | 75% BCI | 95% BCI | ||
| All covariates, non-spatial | 1 | 5 | 12 | 15 | 25 | 9,891 |
| All covariates, spatio-temporal 1 | 2 | 6 | 17 | 26 | 42 | 8,463 |
| Socioeconomic, spatio-temporal 1 | 3 | 9 | 17 | 23 | 36 | 8,883 |
| Environmental, spatio-temporal 1 | 1 | 7 | 16 | 21 | 35 | 9,002 |
| All covariates, spatio-temporal 2 | 1 | 10 | 17 | 32 | 49 | 7,180 |
| Socioeconomic, spatio-temporal 2 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 29 | 45 | 7,191 |
| Environmental, spatio-temporal 2 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 37 | 51 | 7,184 |
Socioeconomic: only socioeconomic covariates included.
Environmental: only environmental covariates included.
Spatio-temporal 1: independent spatial and temporal random effects assumed.
Spatio-temporal 2: spatial correlations evolving over time assumed.
Bayesian hierarchical logistic model regression coefficients (posterior median with 95% BCI in brackets) in the best-fitting models when modeling seroprevalence and underlying ‘true’ prevalence of S. japonicum infection, respectively.
| Parameter (variable) | Modeling seroprevalence | Modeling underlying prevalence |
| α (intercept) | −3.180 (−3.567, −2.736) | −8.053 (−8.836, −6.876) |
| β1 (LST mean) | 0.201 (0.086, 0.337) | 0.669 (0.270, 1.116) |
| β2 (NDVI mean) | −0.327 (−0.479, −0.176) | −1.044 (−1.549, −0.651) |
| β3 (distance to water body) | −0.277 (−0.435, −0.112) | −1.069 (−1.770, −0.353) |
| ϕ1 (spatial decay 1995) | 0.505 (0.169, 6.549) | 3.904 (0.701, 7.493) |
| ϕ2 (spatial decay 1996) | 0.144 (0.050, 0.439) | 3.554 (0.522, 7.481) |
| ϕ3 (spatial decay 1997) | 0.091 (0.031, 0.251) | 3.721 (0.555, 7.474) |
| ϕ4 (spatial decay 1998) | 0.265 (0.119, 0.632) | 3.893 (0.556, 7.486) |
| ϕ5 (spatial decay 1999) | 0.149 (0.052, 1.537) | 0.801 (0.145, 7.170) |
| ϕ6 (spatial decay 2000) | 0.089 (0.033, 0.252) | 1.317 (0.121, 7.342) |
| ϕ7 (spatial decay 2001) | 0.221 (0.072, 5.326) | 4.544 (1.005, 7.513) |
| ϕ8 (spatial decay 2002) | 0.057 (0.021, 0.181) | 4.152 (0.664, 7.507) |
| ϕ9 (spatial decay 2003) | 0.054 (0.021, 0.143) | 4.047 (0.672, 7.488) |
| ϕ10 (spatial decay 2004) | 0.363 (0.138, 4.599) | 4.487 (1.016, 7.515) |
Best-fitting models: spatial correlations evolving over time assumed and only environmental covariates included.
Adjusted for diagnostic error of IHA.
Figure 3The minimum distance (posterior median and 95% BCI) at which spatial correlation was less than 5% in Dangtu county, Anhui province, southeastern part of the People's Republic of China from 1995 to 2004.
(A) For seroprevalence (diagnostic error ignored); (B) for underlying prevalence (diagnostic error taken into account).
Figure 4Prevalence maps of S. japonicum infection in Dangtu county, Anhui province, southeast China in 2005.
(A) Map of predicted prevalence, and (B) map of prediction error when diagnostic error is ignored; (C) Map of predicted prevalence, and (D) map of prediction error when diagnostic error is considered.