| Literature DB >> 21152440 |
Rita M Zorzenon dos Santos1, Ana Amador, Wayner V de Souza, Maria Fatima P M de Albuquerque, Silvina Ponce Dawson, Antonio Ruffino-Netto, Carlos R Zárate-Bladés, Celio L Silva.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Detailed analysis of the dynamic interactions among biological, environmental, social, and economic factors that favour the spread of certain diseases is extremely useful for designing effective control strategies. Diseases like tuberculosis that kills somebody every 15 seconds in the world, require methods that take into account the disease dynamics to design truly efficient control and surveillance strategies. The usual and well established statistical approaches provide insights into the cause-effect relationships that favour disease transmission but they only estimate risk areas, spatial or temporal trends. Here we introduce a novel approach that allows figuring out the dynamical behaviour of the disease spreading. This information can subsequently be used to validate mathematical models of the dissemination process from which the underlying mechanisms that are responsible for this spreading could be inferred. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21152440 PMCID: PMC2994743 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Olinda CT division and its geometrical centres.
(A) Distribution of accumulated TB cases per census tract (CT) during the year 1996. The numbers associated with the coloured boxes represent the number of cases per CT. The map shows the polygons representing the census tracts (CT) into which the city of Olinda is divided. Each CT is an administrative district encompassing an average number of 300 households, or 1200 people. (B) Dots represent the geometrical centres of the polygons of the CT division (299 units) in the 2000 Census, in which we base our analysis of the annual distributions of TB cases for the 1996–2000 period.
Figure 2The annual path of the disease and foci CTs.
In (A) 1996, (B) 1997, (C) 1998, (D) 1999, (E) and 2000 was obtained from the annual distribution of connectivities. The high-burden CTs and the links among them are highlighted in red and belong to all of the annual paths. (F) The epidemiological network (generated by the accumulation of the annual paths) within which disease dissemination takes place. From the mathematical point of view [16], this network can be studied with respect to its distribution of connectivities among the nodes (CT geometrical centres) and with respect to its ability to generate clustering and other effects that may influence the dynamics of disease spreading.
Figure 3Identifying the CTs that maintain the foci.
The sequence of maps shows, in black, the annual connections among the centres of the census tracts reporting infected patients for two consecutive years: (A) 1996–1997, (B) 1997–1998, (C) 1998–1999, and (D) 1999–2000. The 53 high-burden CTs that are sources of infections and the connectivities among them are highlighted in red.
Figure 4The role of high density household on the endemic process.
The superposition of the household density distribution [13] obtained from the Census of 2000 and the network shown in Figure 3E. It becomes clear that the high density household favour the rapid transmission and manifestation of the disease, facilitating the communication between foci and their feeding.
Average of some social, economic and environmental indices computed for regular and foci CTs.
| Indices | Average of people/foci CT | Average of people/regular CT | Increase in foci CTs/regular CTs (%) | Total average of people/CT | Number of CTs with data recorded |
| Females head of family with more than ½ and less than 1 minimum wage of income | 57.3 | 32.1 | 78.5 | 36.6 | 299 |
| Females head of family with income les or equal to ½ minimum wage | 5.9 | 3.3 | 78.8 | 3.9 | 208(44) |
| Females head of family with one year schooling | 9.8 | 5.8 | 70.7 | 6.5 | 268(52) |
| Females head of family with one year or less of schooling (including illiterates) | 26.3 | 15.0 | 75.3 | 17.1 | 284 |
| Females head of family illiterate (no schooling) | 31.7 | 17.6 | 80.1 | 20.2 | 282 |
| Head of family (male and female) without or with less than one year of schooling | 49.8 | 30.2 | 64.9 | 33.8 | 290 |
| Females head of family without schooling | 22.2 | 15.1 | 47 | 16.4 | 288 (52) |
| % of cohabitants without instruction | 14.2 | 9.6 | 48 | 10.4 | 299 |
| % of cohabitants with income less or equal to one minimum wage | 32.7 | 24.7 | 32.4 | 23.9 | 299 |
| Females head of family | 134 | 109 | 22.9 | 114 | 299 |
| Average population size per CT | 1429 | 1188 | 20 | 1230 | 299 |
| Females head of family without income | 222 | 198 | 12 | 202 | 299 |
| Average number of cohabitants per household | 3.94 | 3.77 | 4.5 | 3.80 | 299 |
The indices are presented in the same way (% or not) as they were collected during the 2000 Census. From the available information, no differences were observed between regular and high-burden CTs with respect to the presence or absence of piped water, toilets, and designated places for bulk disposure. However, the average population size per CT and women head of family is 20% greater in the foci than in the regular CTs.
*The total number of CTs was 299; however, the total average is taken from the total number of CTs for which the information was collected; that is indicated on the last column. We indicate in parentheses the number of foci for which there was information available, i.e. the total number of foci considered on the calculus of the average when it was different than 53.
We compared the following information for the 20 CTs that did not present any case during the period to the 279 that did present cases: percentage of heads of family with less than one year or no schooling, households with heads of family with salary less than or equal to one minimum wage, demographic density per Km2, average number of people per household at the CT, and average population size per CT. The Mann-Whitney test used to compare the differences between the two groups indicate that the percentage of head of family with less than one year or no schooling (p = 0.037), average number of people per household (p<0.001) and average population size per CT ( p = 0.002) are higher in the CTs that presented cases than in those that did not.
Figure 5The disease moving among the neighbouring CTs.
The sequence of maps corresponds to snapshots of Supplementary Movie S1, which shows the movement of the disease between the main regions that concentrate a large number of foci CTs. The black circles in each map correspond to the CTs with newly infected individuals that were neighbours of the CTs that had new cases in the previous year.
Figure 6Comparison of the position of the high burden CTs in two different periods.
Using the GC distribution map for the period of 1996–2000 the 53 foci were marked in blue, while in red was indicated the position of the 37 foci from 1991–1995. Therefore in this figure the red foci do not correspond to the GCs of the 1996–2000 period.