| Literature DB >> 19759819 |
Giovanna Raso1, Yuesheng Li, Zhengyuan Zhao, Julie Balen, Gail M Williams, Donald P McManus.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to spatially model the effect of demographic, reservoir hosts and environmental factors on human Schistosoma japonicum infection prevalence in the Dongting Lake area of Hunan Province, China and to determine the potential of each indicator in targeting schistosomiasis control. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19759819 PMCID: PMC2736371 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the Dongting Lake area (Hunan Province, China) showing the human S. japonicum village prevalence based on ELISA, as well as locations where S. japonicum infected buffaloes were found.
Figure 2Map of the Dongting Lake area (Hunan Province, China) showing the human S. japonicum village prevalence based on repeated Kato-Katz readings, as well as locations where S. japonicum infected buffaloes were found.
Figure 3Proportion of study participants that were S. japonicum positive only with ELISA compared to those that were S. japonicum positive with both ELISA and Kato-Katz thick smear in the Dongting Lake area, Hunan Province, China.
Comparison of bivariate non-spatial models for S. japonicum infections based on either ELISA or Kato-Katz results with demographic, reservoir and environmental covariates that were significant at a p-value<0.15.
| Covariate group | Covariate | Covariate category | ELISA | Kato-Katz | ||||
| OR | CI | AIC | OR | CI | AIC | |||
| Demography | ||||||||
| Age group (years) | ||||||||
| 0–10 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 11–20 | 2.06 | 1.68, 2.52 | 1.56 | 0.83, 2.95 | ||||
| 21–30 | 3.59 | 2.91, 4.43 | 4.41 | 2.36, 8.25 | ||||
| 31–40 | 4.42 | 3.65, 5.35 | 6.01 | 3.35, 10.76 | ||||
| 41–50 | 5.27 | 4.34, 6.38 | 8.32 | 4.65, 14.89 | ||||
| >50 | 5.56 | 4.60, 6.73 | 33584 | 8.52 | 4.78, 15.19 | 8442 | ||
| Sex | ||||||||
| Female | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Male | 1.99 | 1.88, 2.11 | 33914 | 3.12 | 2.66, 3.65 | 8474 | ||
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Herdsman, farmer, fisherman or boatman | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Preschool or student | 0.33 | 0.30, 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.13, 0.23 | ||||
| Civil servant or businessman | 0.88 | 0.75, 1.04 | 0.22 | 0.11, 0.47 | ||||
| Other | 0.52 | 0.39, 0.71 | 33690 | 0.56 | 0.27, 1.13 | 8456 | ||
| Reservoir | ||||||||
| Presence of infected buffaloes in the village | 1.76 | 1.66, 1.86 | 34104 | 2.96 | 2.60, 3.40 | 8458 | ||
| Prevalence of infected buffaloes in the village | 1.25 | 1.22, 1.28 | 34136 | 1.35 | 1.29, 1.41 | 8571 | ||
| Environment | ||||||||
| Mean NDVI | 1.20 | 1.16, 1.24 | 34337 | 0.98 | 0.92, 1.05 | 8706 | ||
| Mean NDVI during spring, summer and fall | 1.31 | 1.26, 1.35 | 34204 | 1.16 | 1.07, 1.25 | 8691 | ||
| Mean NDVI during winter | 1.08 | 1.05, 1.11 | 34439 | 0.86 | 0.81, 0.91 | 8682 | ||
| Distance to Dongting Lake (km) | 1.08 | 1.05, 1.11 | 34438 | 1.05 | 0.99, 1.13 | 8703 | ||
| Endemic types | ||||||||
| Lake embankment | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Inside embankment | 0.69 | 0.61, 0.78 | 0.24 | 0.17, 0.33 | ||||
| Lake fork | 1.02 | 0.94, 1.12 | 0.72 | 0.60, 0.85 | ||||
| Grassy lake beach/marshland | 0.78 | 0.70, 0.86 | 0.16 | 0.12, 0.21 | ||||
| Hills/hilly area | 0.52 | 0.45, 0.61 | 34292 | 0.02 | 0.01, 0.07 | 8324 | ||
OR: Odds ratio.
CI: Confidence interval.
Akaike information criterion. The smaller the AIC the better the model performance.
Comparison of 5 different non-spatial and spatial models for S. japonicum infections based on ELISA examination showing the importance of including spatial correlation in the analyses as well as the inclusion of the different demographic, reservoir and environmental covariates.
| Covariate group | Covariate | Covariate category | Bayesian non-spatial | Bayesian spatial | ||||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | ||||||||
| OR | BCI | OR | BCI | OR | BCI | OR | BCI | OR | BCI | |||
| Demography | ||||||||||||
| Age group (years) | ||||||||||||
| 0–10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| 11–20 | 1.87 | 1.52, 2.29 | 1.87 | 1.51, 2.31 | 1.89 | 1.52, 2.31 | ||||||
| 21–30 | 2.29 | 1.69, 3.09 | 2.27 | 1.65, 3.15 | 2.32 | 1.68, 3.06 | ||||||
| 31–40 | 2.79 | 2.09, 3.71 | 2.77 | 2.04, 3.78 | 2.82 | 2.07, 3.68 | ||||||
| 41–50 | 3.31 | 2.47, 4.41 | 3.28 | 2.42, 4.51 | 3.35 | 2.44, 4.37 | ||||||
| >50 | 3.51 | 2.62, 4.68 | 3.49 | 2.57, 4.77 | 3.56 | 2.60, 4.65 | ||||||
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Female | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Male | 2.08 | 1.96, 2.21 | 2.08 | 1.96, 2.21 | 2.08 | 1.96, 2.22 | ||||||
| Occupation | ||||||||||||
| Herdsman, farmer, fisherman or boatman | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Preschool or student | 0.60 | 0.48, 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.47, 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.48, 0.74 | ||||||
| Civil servant or businessman | 0.70 | 0.52, 0.91 | 0.70 | 0.52, 0.92 | 0.71 | 0.53, 0.93 | ||||||
| Other | 0.50 | 0.35, 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.36, 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.36, 0.67 | ||||||
| Reservoir | ||||||||||||
| Presence of infected buffaloes in the village | 2.26 | 1.24, 3.76 | 2.40 | 1.32, 4.15 | ||||||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||
| Mean NDVI during spring, summer and fall | 0.97 | 0.95, 1.02 | ||||||||||
| Distance to Dongting Lake (km) | 1.21 | 0.93, 1.60 | ||||||||||
| Endemic types | ||||||||||||
| Lake embankment | 1 | |||||||||||
| Inside embankment | 1.02 | 0.42, 2.10 | ||||||||||
| Lake fork | 0.73 | 0.31, 1.56 | ||||||||||
| Grassy lake beach/marshland | 1.20 | 0.43, 2.73 | ||||||||||
| Hills/hilly area | 0.76 | 0.18, 2.11 | ||||||||||
|
| 49.74 | 3.98, 234.10 | 64.17 | 5.84, 241.10 | 51.57 | 5.38, 234.70 | 47.92 | 4.60, 236.30 | ||||
|
| 0.90 | 0.55, 1.54 | 0.88 | 0.56, 1.40 | 0.78 | 0.48, 1.30 | 0.83 | 0.50, 1.40 | ||||
| DIC | 34464 | 31766 | 30292 | 30293 | 30293 |
OR: odds ratio.
BCI: Bayesian credible interval.
u is scalar parameter representing the rate of decline of correlation with distance between points.
σ is the estimate of the geographic variability.
DIC is the measure for the model fit. A smaller DIC indicates a better performance of the model.
Comparison of 5 different non-spatial and spatial models for S. japonicum infections based on Kato-Katz examination showing the importance of including spatial correlation in the analyses as well as the inclusion of the different demographic, reservoir and environmental covariates.
| Covariate group | Covariate | Covariate category | Bayesian non-spatial | Bayesian spatial | ||||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | ||||||||
| OR | BCI | OR | BCI | OR | BCI | OR | BCI | OR | BCI | |||
| Demography | ||||||||||||
| Age group (years) | ||||||||||||
| 0–10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| 11–20 | 1.36 | 0.69, 2.65 | 1.43 | 0.70, 2.61 | 1.47 | 0.75, 2.68 | ||||||
| 21–30 | 2.44 | 0.89, 5.84 | 2.64 | 0.95, 5.90 | 2.80 | 1.08, 6.13 | ||||||
| 31–40 | 3.06 | 1.16, 7.29 | 3.31 | 1.22, 7.31 | 3.51 | 1.40, 7.60 | ||||||
| 41–50 | 4.22 | 1.58, 10.05 | 4.56 | 1.69, 10.07 | 4.85 | 1.94, 10.55 | ||||||
| >50 | 4.47 | 1.67, 10.69 | 4.82 | 1.79, 10.50 | 5.13 | 2.09, 11.05 | ||||||
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Female | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Male | 3.18 | 2.70, 3.75 | 3.18 | 2.70, 3.74 | 3.20 | 2.71, 3.77 | ||||||
| Occupation | ||||||||||||
| Herdsman, farmer, fisherman or boatman | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
| Preschool or student | 0.48 | 0.23, 0.91 | 0.50 | 0.24, 0.93 | 0.52 | 0.26, 0.96 | ||||||
| Civil servant or businessman | 0.40 | 0.11, 0.93 | 0.40 | 0.12, 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.12, 0.94 | ||||||
| Other | 0.62 | 0.25, 0.91 | 0.63 | 0.27, 1.17 | 0.63 | 0.26, 1.17 | ||||||
| Reservoir | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Presence of infected buffaloes in the village | 5.34 | 1.14, 16.03 | 7.04 | 1.56, 24.23 | ||||||||
| Environment | ||||||||||||
| Mean NDVI during winter | 0.74 | 0.31, 1.69 | ||||||||||
| Distance to Dongting Lake (km) | 1.22 | 0.55, 2.33 | ||||||||||
| Endemic types | ||||||||||||
| Lake embankment | 1 | |||||||||||
| Inside embankment | 2.15 | 0.15, 9.76 | ||||||||||
| Lake fork | 0.51 | 0.03, 2.20 | ||||||||||
| Grassy lake beach/marshland | 13.49 | 0.43, 75.17 | ||||||||||
| Hills/hilly area | 16.07 | 0.01, 57.75 | ||||||||||
|
| 15.21 | 2.51, 137.50 | 19.96 | 2.64, 185.50 | 19.47 | 3.11, 175.40 | 11.26 | 1.58, 87.00 | ||||
|
| 6.35 | 3.08, 13.32 | 6.50 | 3.26, 13.22 | 5.92 | 2.88, 11.43 | 7.29 | 2.98, 18.89 | ||||
| DICe | 8705 | 7149 | 6652 | 6652 | 6649 |
OR: odds ratio.
BCI: Bayesian credible interval.
u is scalar parameter representing the rate of decline of correlation with distance between points.
σ is the estimate of the geographic variability.
DIC is the measure for the model fit. A smaller DIC indicates a better performance of the model.