BACKGROUND: In the Raloxifene Use for The Heart trial, 10 101 postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease (CHD) or multiple CHD risk factors were randomly assigned to 60 mg/d raloxifene or to placebo and followed for a median of 5.6 years. Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, was found to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer and vertebral fractures but not the risk of cardiovascular events. Here, we provide further details about breast cancer incidence by tumor characteristics, duration of treatment, and subgroup. METHODS: Reported breast cancer was adjudicated by an independent committee based on medical records and pathology reports. The primary analyses used Cox proportional hazards models with time to first breast cancer as the outcome. Subgroup effects were analyzed using similar models with terms for treatment by subgroup. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: As previously reported, raloxifene reduced the incidence of invasive breast cancer by 44% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38 to 0.83; absolute risk reduction = 1.2 invasive breast cancers per 1000 women treated for 1 year). The lower incidence of invasive breast cancer reflected a 55% lower incidence of invasive estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.72). However, raloxifene treatment did not reduce the incidence of noninvasive breast cancer or of invasive ER-negative breast cancer. The reduced incidence of invasive breast cancer was similar across subgroups, including those defined by age, body mass index, family history of breast cancer, prior use of postmenopausal hormones, and 5-year estimated risk of invasive breast cancer. CONCLUSION:Raloxifene reduces risk of invasive ER-positive breast cancer regardless of a woman's baseline breast cancer risk but does not reduce risk of noninvasive or ER-negative breast cancers. These results confirm those of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation, a previous randomized trial among women with osteoporosis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In the Raloxifene Use for The Heart trial, 10 101 postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease (CHD) or multiple CHD risk factors were randomly assigned to 60 mg/d raloxifene or to placebo and followed for a median of 5.6 years. Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, was found to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer and vertebral fractures but not the risk of cardiovascular events. Here, we provide further details about breast cancer incidence by tumor characteristics, duration of treatment, and subgroup. METHODS: Reported breast cancer was adjudicated by an independent committee based on medical records and pathology reports. The primary analyses used Cox proportional hazards models with time to first breast cancer as the outcome. Subgroup effects were analyzed using similar models with terms for treatment by subgroup. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: As previously reported, raloxifene reduced the incidence of invasive breast cancer by 44% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38 to 0.83; absolute risk reduction = 1.2 invasive breast cancers per 1000 women treated for 1 year). The lower incidence of invasive breast cancer reflected a 55% lower incidence of invasive estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.72). However, raloxifene treatment did not reduce the incidence of noninvasive breast cancer or of invasive ER-negative breast cancer. The reduced incidence of invasive breast cancer was similar across subgroups, including those defined by age, body mass index, family history of breast cancer, prior use of postmenopausal hormones, and 5-year estimated risk of invasive breast cancer. CONCLUSION:Raloxifene reduces risk of invasive ER-positive breast cancer regardless of a woman's baseline breast cancer risk but does not reduce risk of noninvasive or ER-negative breast cancers. These results confirm those of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation, a previous randomized trial among women with osteoporosis.
Authors: William E Sumner; Leonidas G Koniaris; Sarah E Snell; Seth Spector; Jodeen Powell; Eli Avisar; Frederick Moffat; Alan S Livingstone; Dido Franceschi Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: J A Cauley; L Norton; M E Lippman; S Eckert; K A Krueger; D W Purdie; J Farrerons; A Karasik; D Mellstrom; K W Ng; J J Stepan; T J Powles; M Morrow; A Costa; S L Silfen; E L Walls; H Schmitt; D B Muchmore; V C Jordan; L G Ste-Marie Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: L Mosca; E Barrett-Connor; N K Wenger; P Collins; D Grady; M Kornitzer; E Moscarelli; S Paul; T J Wright; J D Helterbrand; P W Anderson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; John Bryant; Stewart Anderson; James Dignam; Edwin R Fisher; Norman Wolmark Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Sep 4-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anieta M Sieuwerts; Giuseppina De Napoli; Anne van Galen; Helenius J Kloosterboer; Vanja de Weerd; Hong Zhang; John W M Martens; John A Foekens; Christian De Geyter Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Lonnele J Ball; Nitzan Levy; Xiaoyue Zhao; Chandi Griffin; Mary Tagliaferri; Isaac Cohen; William A Ricke; Terence P Speed; Gary L Firestone; Dale C Leitman Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Kurt Lippuner; P A Buchard; C De Geyter; B Imthurn; O Lamy; M Litschgi; F Luzuy; K Schiessl; P Stute; M Birkhäuser Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Stephane Zervoudis; George Iatrakis; Eirini Tomara; Anastasia Bothou; George Papadopoulos; George Tsakiris Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-08-10
Authors: Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Peter Collins; Lori Mosca; Mary Jane Geiger; Deborah Grady; Marcel Kornitzer; Messan G Amewou-Atisso; Mark B Effron; Sherie A Dowsett; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 29.690