Literature DB >> 25114851

Main controversies in breast cancer.

Stephane Zervoudis1, George Iatrakis1, Eirini Tomara1, Anastasia Bothou1, George Papadopoulos1, George Tsakiris1.   

Abstract

In this article, we have reviewed available evidence for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up in female breast cancer (BC). Into daily clinical practice some controversies are occurred. Especially, in the diagnosis field, despite the fact that the optimal age in which screening mammography should start is a subject of intense controversy, there is a shift toward the beginning at the age of 40 although it is suggested that the net benefit is small for women aged 40 to 49 years. In addition, a promising tool in BC screening seems to be breast tomosynthesis. Other tools such as 3D ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) are full of optimism in BC screening although ultrasonography is not yet a first-line screening method and there is insufficient evidence to recommend the systemic use of the SWE for BC screening. As for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), even if it is useful in BC detection in women who have a strong family history of BC, it is not generally recommended as a screening tool. Moreover, based on the lack of randomized clinical trials showing a benefit of presurgical breast MRI in overall survival, it's integration into breast surgical operations remains debatable. Interestingly, in contrast to fine needle aspiration, core biopsy has gained popularity in presurgical diagnosis. Furthermore, after conservative surgery in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, the recent tendency is the shift from axillary dissection to axillary conserving strategies. While the accuracy of sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and second BC surgery remains controversial, more time is needed for evaluation and for determining the optimal interval between the two surgeries. Additionally, in the decision between immediate or delayed breast reconstruction, there is a tendency in the immediate use. In the prevention of BC, the controversial issue between tamoxifen and raloxifene becomes clear with raloxifene be more profitable through the toxicities of tamoxifen. However, the prevention of bone metastasis with bisphosphonates is still conflicting. Last but not least, in the follow-up of BC survivors, mammography, history and physical examination are the means of an early detection of BC recurrence. ed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Controversies; Diagnosis; Follow-up; Treatment

Year:  2014        PMID: 25114851      PMCID: PMC4127607          DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2218-4333


  126 in total

1.  Effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making and cancer recurrence rates.

Authors:  Federica Pediconi; Elena Miglio; Marianna Telesca; Maria Laura Luciani; Miles A Kirchin; Roberto Passariello; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  An analysis of fine needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy in clinically palpable breast lesions: a report on the predictive values and a cost comparison.

Authors:  Sapna Nagar; Anthony Iacco; Thomas Riggs; William Kestenberg; Richard Keidan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Continuing outcomes relevant to Evista: breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal osteoporotic women in a randomized trial of raloxifene.

Authors:  Silvana Martino; Jane A Cauley; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Trevor J Powles; John Mershon; Damon Disch; Roberta J Secrest; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: late results of the Italian Randomized Tamoxifen Prevention Trial among women with hysterectomy.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Nicole Rotmensz; Bernardo Bonanni; Peter Boyle; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Costa; Virgilio Sacchini; Roberto Travaglini; Giuseppe D'Aiuto; Pasquale Oliviero; Francesco Lovison; Giacomo Gucciardo; Marco Rosselli del Turco; Maria Grazia Muraca; Maria Antonietta Pizzichetta; Serafino Conforti; Andrea Decensi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for accelerated partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  Chirag Shah; Frank Vicini; David E Wazer; Douglas Arthur; Rakesh R Patel
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Vera J Suman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Henry M Kuerer; Monet Bowling; Teresa S Flippo-Morton; David R Byrd; David W Ollila; Thomas B Julian; Sarah A McLaughlin; Linda McCall; W Fraser Symmans; Huong T Le-Petross; Bruce G Haffty; Thomas A Buchholz; Heidi Nelson; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Sentinel Node and Recurrent Breast Cancer (SNARB): results of a nationwide registration study.

Authors:  Adriana J G Maaskant-Braat; Rudi M H Roumen; Adri C Voogd; Rik Pijpers; Ernest J T Luiten; Emiel J T Rutgers; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Douglas W Arthur; Thomas A Buchholz; Bruce G Haffty; Carol A Hahn; Patricia H Hardenbergh; Thomas B Julian; Lawrence B Marks; Dorin A Todor; Frank A Vicini; Timothy J Whelan; Julia White; Jennifer Y Wo; Jay R Harris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Impact of micrometastases in the sentinel node of patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora M Hansen; Baiba Grube; Xing Ye; Roderick R Turner; R James Brenner; Myung-Shin Sim; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Jim Ingle; Alan Coates; John Forbes; Judith Bliss; Marc Buyse; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Marco Colleoni; Charles Coombes; Claire Snowdon; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Manfred Kaufmann; Francesco Boccardo; Jon Godwin; Christina Davies; Richard Peto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Surgical treatment of skeletal metastases].

Authors:  T Gösling; M Becker-Schiebe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Impact of different type of cancer treatment on the effectiveness of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Joanna Szloch; Elżbieta Marczyk; Marta Kołodziej-Rzepa; Andrzej L Komorowski
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  Learning lessons from operational research in infectious diseases: can the same model be used for noncommunicable diseases in developing countries?

Authors:  William K Bosu
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-12-04

4.  Impact of Size of the Tumour, Persistence of Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone Receptors, HER2Neu Receptors and Ki67 Values on Positivity of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Early Breast Cancer with Clinically Negative Axillary Examination.

Authors:  Borislav Kondov; Rosalinda Isijanovska; Zvonko Milenkovikj; Gordana Petrusevska; Marija Jovanovski-Srceva; Magdalena Bogdanovska-Todorovska; Goran Kondov
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-26

Review 5.  Detecting Blood-Based Biomarkers in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Their Current Status and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  A M Sofie Berghuis; Hendrik Koffijberg; Jai Prakash; Leon W M M Terstappen; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Overexpression of CXXC5 is a strong poor prognostic factor in ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Lei Fang; Yu Wang; Yang Gao; Xuejun Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Value of magnetic resonance diffusion combined with perfusion imaging techniques for diagnosing potentially malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Xin-Yi Zhang; Yong Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 1.534

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology.

Authors:  João Ricardo Maltez de Almeida; André Boechat Gomes; Thomas Pitangueira Barros; Paulo Eduardo Fahel; Mario de Souza Rocha
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.